New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
posted 1 month ago by XBX_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
XBX_X on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
> It exists to make forgeries of historical evidence, that is it.

That would count as evil. And I mentioned how it should be illegal to publish AI videos involving candidates. There's already entire sites dedicated to prompt-based AI porn. Meaning someone or a group of people were able to train a model to make porn of women ... meaning it could easily do the same of children, right?

This is something that the DoJ and child welfare groups are seriously concerned about because current laws are specifically predicated, by definition and in their very language, on endangerment and exploitation. In other words, the content itself isn't illegal, because porn is 100% legal and even protected as speech; it's the fact that a child was exploited to make that particular content that makes it illegal. Well, does that mean no crime was committed if no human minor was ever exploited? It's literally just pixels, arranged in a particular way. This unforeseeable technology undermines so many laws, in so many fundamental ways. Any lawyer worth their salt would argue, "Where is the victim?"

Indeed, *"You may live to see man-made horrors beyond your comprehension."*
Toast message