You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
alele-opathic on scored.co
15 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
> But the biggest concern is how this tech can be exploited for evil.
You are missing the whole point of why this tech exists. It exists to make forgeries of historical evidence, that is it.
It is now meaningless e.g. if you happen to have the video of the 9/11 towers with no plane/jet engine sounds. If you actually happened to have the 'Frazzledrip' vid, it now has no import as its provenance is sus. Not saying it was, but if the 'DE weapons caused the cali fires' actually was true, and you happened to have a video of it, it wouldn't matter. If bigfoot turned out to be real and whole families of them move into a town somewhere in the midwest, everyone would first suspect AI slop.
You will never be able to verify anything you didn't see yourself, all while pushing people to stay at home more and more. I know people who wouldn't leave their apartment unless you made them, and now they can collect a paycheck, get all of their food door-dashed, etc. One of these guys legit let his car battery die from not driving it. These guys already don't live in reality, their attack surface is so large already.
> It exists to make forgeries of historical evidence, that is it.
That would count as evil. And I mentioned how it should be illegal to publish AI videos involving candidates. There's already entire sites dedicated to prompt-based AI porn. Meaning someone or a group of people were able to train a model to make porn of women ... meaning it could easily do the same of children, right?
This is something that the DoJ and child welfare groups are seriously concerned about because current laws are specifically predicated, by definition and in their very language, on endangerment and exploitation. In other words, the content itself isn't illegal, because porn is 100% legal and even protected as speech; it's the fact that a child was exploited to make that particular content that makes it illegal. Well, does that mean no crime was committed if no human minor was ever exploited? It's literally just pixels, arranged in a particular way. This unforeseeable technology undermines so many laws, in so many fundamental ways. Any lawyer worth their salt would argue, "Where is the victim?"
Indeed, *"You may live to see man-made horrors beyond your comprehension."*
You are missing the whole point of why this tech exists. It exists to make forgeries of historical evidence, that is it.
It is now meaningless e.g. if you happen to have the video of the 9/11 towers with no plane/jet engine sounds. If you actually happened to have the 'Frazzledrip' vid, it now has no import as its provenance is sus. Not saying it was, but if the 'DE weapons caused the cali fires' actually was true, and you happened to have a video of it, it wouldn't matter. If bigfoot turned out to be real and whole families of them move into a town somewhere in the midwest, everyone would first suspect AI slop.
You will never be able to verify anything you didn't see yourself, all while pushing people to stay at home more and more. I know people who wouldn't leave their apartment unless you made them, and now they can collect a paycheck, get all of their food door-dashed, etc. One of these guys legit let his car battery die from not driving it. These guys already don't live in reality, their attack surface is so large already.
That would count as evil. And I mentioned how it should be illegal to publish AI videos involving candidates. There's already entire sites dedicated to prompt-based AI porn. Meaning someone or a group of people were able to train a model to make porn of women ... meaning it could easily do the same of children, right?
This is something that the DoJ and child welfare groups are seriously concerned about because current laws are specifically predicated, by definition and in their very language, on endangerment and exploitation. In other words, the content itself isn't illegal, because porn is 100% legal and even protected as speech; it's the fact that a child was exploited to make that particular content that makes it illegal. Well, does that mean no crime was committed if no human minor was ever exploited? It's literally just pixels, arranged in a particular way. This unforeseeable technology undermines so many laws, in so many fundamental ways. Any lawyer worth their salt would argue, "Where is the victim?"
Indeed, *"You may live to see man-made horrors beyond your comprehension."*