New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
The best way to judge people and know whether or not to engage in any way with them is to listen to our ancestors. I mean this in 2 ways :

1. Judge generally, place people in groups they belong to. When you judge a people, your words should sound like a quote from a roman. Objective, fair, but pulling no punches and generalizing.

“The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.”

– Marcus Tullius Cicero

2. We should hear what our ancestors said about groups of people and listen to their observations.

Why should we judge in this way?

Generalization is good and necessary because we all live in societies, whether it's tribes, whether it's villlages, or whole countries. There are no individualists, because individualism itself is a unique construct. ONLY white people have ever tried to be individuals, after endless propaganda from the chosen people.

When your borders are open for the third world to come flooding in, they aren't vetting migrants and bringing in only the doctors and engineers, they're bringing in people IN GENERAL, and you should judge them by how they behave IN GENERAL.

The second point about listening to your forebears is simply because they weren't the victims of endless propaganda like we are. Their world was better. And their world was better because they had different beliefs and actions. So maybe we should look at what they did.
You must log in or sign up to comment
6 comments:
AnotherAlt on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
My undergrad was anthropology (i know) im surprised and how brainwashed people have become into not seeing people in terms of peoplegroups. I dont see any degradation to my life by not having black people in it
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
The entire liberal worldview is based on pacifism. Only in pacifism you can afford to judge people as individuals.

But that's not how war works. In war you don't consider someone an enemy because you saw him personally doing something wrong. In war you generalize.

That's also why libtard RRREEEEEEd so hard at the Russian invasion: because the very concept of war invalidates their entire worldview.
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Yup, and this is why I also hate libertarians now too. I was mostly one around the Ron Paul run up. How fucking retarded was I?!?
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
I used to be a classical liberal, although not a libertarian (there's a big difference).

The mistake that we made is to think that non-whites see the world like we do. Perhaps classical liberalism would work in a world of only White people. But non-whites (including Jews) only think and act as collectives. MacDonald did an analysis on this.

AnotherAlt on scored.co
11 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
I used to be classic liberal/ libertarian, but i realize only true freedom is found in the confines of not harming yourself and following Gods laws for man. And in that i believe should be legislation for all to have a proper society. So i guess im a christian authoritarian nationalist or something
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
11 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
If you think of freedom in terms of individual freedom, then you are still a liberal.

Right wing means thinking of freedom only as a collective: the nation / tribe achieves freedom against foreign enemies by growing stronger together.
Toast message