I think I heard it somewhere on Gab, that...
If you explain all the details of the gruesome treatment and murder of a White person (as for one example, Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom) by blacks, but call the perpetrators "niggers", the indoctrinated and nons will be more offended at the use of "nigger" than they will be at the details of the horrific treatment of the White person.
I used to believe that people couldn't be that brainwashed and hypocritical. I was wrong. It's far worse than anyone predicted or could have imagined.
If you explain all the details of the gruesome treatment and murder of a White person (as for one example, Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom) by blacks, but call the perpetrators "niggers", the indoctrinated and nons will be more offended at the use of "nigger" than they will be at the details of the horrific treatment of the White person.
I used to believe that people couldn't be that brainwashed and hypocritical. I was wrong. It's far worse than anyone predicted or could have imagined.
Parents defending their children from other, thieving children is the real problem.
What sense does that make? You've got your George Groyd and Karmelo Anthony. The latter is far worse than the former, since he's indisputably the murderer rather than, as in the case of Groyd, ostensibly the murdered.
Maybe enough Whites have simply decided: We have our own analogue to Karmelo Anthony, and ours isn't the thieving murderer that yours is. Our Karmelo Anthony is better and will be stronger than yours if Whites actually collectivize for once. We will crush yours and protect ours.
One problem with Whites is that liberal individualism makes them individualize every attack on them. It's just one person attacking another. None of my business. He probably deserved it, if not, he was probably just unlucky. But Groyd's death and others like it, by contrast, aren't individualized: they are attacks by every White on every groid. Chauvin was simply the avatar of the entire White Race, all of whom are responsible.
That asymmetrical response needs to end. Shiloh isn't a saint, I'm sure Austin wasn't either, especially with that worthless father of his, but Whites have to make a stand somewhere, because it was him yesterday, is her today, and will be someone closer to you tomorrow. Groids never waited for one of their saints to be killed because they have none, hence their ardent defence of serial criminal trash like Groyd. For if they don't defend trash, just who do they have left to defend? Whites are not murdering their little old ladies or others who it would be optically better to defend, leaving them with no choice but to take up the cause of trash.
This Brazilian-looking mad malicious maniacal monstrous munted mongrel mud mutt mutant monkey menace and that inbred-looking hillbilly hick that someone posted earlier today both belong in 'Cracolandia', Brazil, with needles in their arms. (Incidentally, a place where everyone is indeed mixed-race and thus better fits their ideal.) They don't belong in any place worthy of the label 'civilized'. Go and whinge about Whites in your crack den.
Also interesting that she decries 'racism' while she's doing the exact same thing, only ever taking her own side. Apparently taking your own side is always 'anti-racist' rather than racist when it comes down to groids. We know who else she cares about: Groyd, Karmelo. No one outside of her race. But Whites can't do the same, apparently. Would a single groid care about this event if the thieving child was Asian or (non-black) Hispanic instead? No. Slogan may as well be: Black First, Black Forever.
Also, since we're on the topic of groids, I'd like to offer a hearty congratulations to a certain prominent one of them, George N. E. Groyd, for his several years of being crime- and drug-free. Some chauvinism and fentanyl was all it took for him to realize this fine achievement.
over $520K now!
https://www.givesendgo.com/ShilohHendrix
Donate
====
https://files.catbox.moe/vfeh8m.mp4