Just what we need, more niggers and shit skins
(twitter.com)
Or just make it a family tax deduction (not credit) or applied against a home loan.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
23 comments:
deleted
1 year ago
28 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+28Score on mirror
)
1 child
Mirrored from scored.co
5
1 year ago
5 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+5Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
1 year ago
1 point
(+0
/
-0
/
+1Score on mirror
)
But that's what the natsees did, which means it's le bad
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
It should only be given to families if they are married, the husband is employed and they're on no form of government assistance. A period of residency should be applied also.
Period of residency? Like be a US citizen? This is a federal bonus. Shouldn’t matter if you move states.
Yes. Period of residency as a US citizen. I wasn't sure how to word it. You must have maintained residency and establish US citizenship for a period of no less than ten years. That would prevent this from being used as an incentive by the mudflood of invaders.
More gibs, more handouts, more reasons for niggers and shitskins to show up and outbreed the natives.
We may as well house them and feed them and give them jobs and... oh wait
We may as well house them and feed them and give them jobs and... oh wait
This would be based if it were whites only or at least came with enough strings attached to prevent nogs from abusing it.
now this might sound out there, but research by the leftist Brookings Institute found that over 90%+ of people who accomplish only 3 specific things will leave poverty and join the middle class at least, and a sizable portion of those become net positive taxpayers... those 3 things are (1) don't get pregnant before either you're married or 21, (2) don't get arrested, especially not for drug use, and (3) do finish high school.
* so first off, don't even do $5k per baby... a certain prior administration in germany found it very successful to incentivize births with 25%+ of their home price per child. so peg it to the average mortgage, which is currently about $2k per month. at $24k per year, 25% would be $6k per baby per year, significantly higher than the current child tax credits.
* it MUST be done as a tax deduction, not a credit. deduction simply means it's zeroing out taxes that would potentially be payable, while a credit means this could become a liability, and the taxpayer literally pays people cash to have babies. those are a whole load of difference, because it keeps interests aligned. the entire purpose of this is to subsidize creation of genuine future likely taxpayers and proliferating this kind of responsible culture.
* yes to not only requiring the parents to be married to retain it, but also that the parents must be cohabiting, and never have been divorced. if you divorce, especially for no fault, you're disqualified forever. single parents are fucking cancer for children, and it's far too easy. we need MORE incentives to nuclear families, not less.
* the parents and the children must be in good standing with law enforcement. any conviction, even misdemeanor = disqualified through the year the sentence is completed + 3 years.
* the children must be in good standing with school attendance, and not flunking.
* the child must not become pregnant. abortion = disqualified.
society has already gone the route of not just subsidizing broken families, but even encouraging and incentivizing it. we need to step back from that.
* so first off, don't even do $5k per baby... a certain prior administration in germany found it very successful to incentivize births with 25%+ of their home price per child. so peg it to the average mortgage, which is currently about $2k per month. at $24k per year, 25% would be $6k per baby per year, significantly higher than the current child tax credits.
* it MUST be done as a tax deduction, not a credit. deduction simply means it's zeroing out taxes that would potentially be payable, while a credit means this could become a liability, and the taxpayer literally pays people cash to have babies. those are a whole load of difference, because it keeps interests aligned. the entire purpose of this is to subsidize creation of genuine future likely taxpayers and proliferating this kind of responsible culture.
* yes to not only requiring the parents to be married to retain it, but also that the parents must be cohabiting, and never have been divorced. if you divorce, especially for no fault, you're disqualified forever. single parents are fucking cancer for children, and it's far too easy. we need MORE incentives to nuclear families, not less.
* the parents and the children must be in good standing with law enforcement. any conviction, even misdemeanor = disqualified through the year the sentence is completed + 3 years.
* the children must be in good standing with school attendance, and not flunking.
* the child must not become pregnant. abortion = disqualified.
society has already gone the route of not just subsidizing broken families, but even encouraging and incentivizing it. we need to step back from that.
Doesn't even cover a year of college debt.
The money means very little to the rationale of a woman; they don't think in terms caring for themselves (although, if every mother got the equivalent of child support from the government, that might shift the needle).
Women want stability, and Trump has thrown everything into the air in terms of the economy.
The money means very little to the rationale of a woman; they don't think in terms caring for themselves (although, if every mother got the equivalent of child support from the government, that might shift the needle).
Women want stability, and Trump has thrown everything into the air in terms of the economy.
Toast message