Fascism is not a right wing ideology. National socialism is not a right wing ideology. National socialism is centrist, fascism veers left.
These terms also hold no weight, because they change on a whim. Originally, collectivism was a right wing ideology. A staunchly right wing one. But the soviet union did it too, so now it's left wing, and individualism is right wing. "Freedom of religion" was a left wing ideology. Now it's a right wing one, because the soviet union cracked down on religion. Capitalism itself was originally left wing, now it's right wing. Again, because the soviet union existed. And apparently everything the soviet union did was left wing, even though not everything it did was. Environmentalism was right wing and disrupted "progress". Now it's left wing for some reason or another. You get the point. I could go on for days.
Anything that was upheld by the French monarchy during the French revolution, which was originally right wing, that the US did not adopt, that the soviet union brought back (they did that with a lot of things, its complicated), is now left wing. Anything that the jacobins upheld, which is now currently upheld by the United States in particular and the west in general, which the ussr did not adopt, is now right wing and conservative. The dichotomy has held no meaning because it keeps switching sides.
Another one: Faggotry was on the radar of approximately zero groups of people until recently. The soviet union hated faggots, Marx, and any other socialist writers never mentioned them at all, the west hated faggots slightly less. But faggotry is left wing because.... uhhh.... because it just is okay? Ignore the fact that every left wing state actively killed them.
Do you see how these terms have no actual fucking meaning?
Third positionism in general is usually not right wing period. Though it *can be*. Though because of its ties to mussolini, it's founding father, who was a recovering marxist, and based his ideas around heterodox socialism, it usually is decidedly not right wing at all. It's almost universally anti reactionary, and is typically anti capitalist.
Some third positionist movements, namely falangism, were almost *far left*. Fiscally closer in ideology to the soviet union than to Hitlers Germany or Mussolini's Italy.
What's the common current then? Everyone knew about the jewish issue, nationalism, religion, and race, which is why Hitler aligned with the Falange. They would never agree on fiscal policy. Who cares? They agreed on the menace plaguing the planet. That's what matters.
Language is a powerful tool. Jews police it. By throwing around terms like "left" and "right" you give leverage to the nu-speak that they have invented to dumb down politics and conflict into demonizing one group and praising another.
That is all.
Georges Sorel.
Sorel provided the intellectual meat and potatoes for both *bolshevism and fascism*. And actively approved of *both* simultaneously. He lived to see the ussr and fascist Italy. He was in correspondence with mussolini and Lenin. He liked both of them.
Perhaps the most unhinged of all communist philosophers, Georges Sorel was originally a conventional orthodox marxist who decided to foray into radical French neofeudalist reactionary groups, very interestingly enough, and formed his own ideals based off of the synthesis of those 2 incredibly opposing interests.
Some ideas he had that were taken by both the bolsheviks and mussolini, that were not from marx were: glorification of war and violence, the status of heroic myth, anti democracy, collectivism, the organization of society into syndicates (corporations in fascism, soviets in bolshevism), et al. Read his work if you get the time, you can see where both splintered from him.
These ideas came from his workings with the aforementioned French reactionary neofeudalist monarchists. Not from Marx, but he was originally a marxist. These ideas are all incredibly reactionary, almost reaching the level of *evola* in effect. But what made the ussr and fascist Italy different enough to be at odds at the end of the day is incredibly simple: nationalism, jews vs non jews, and Christianity.
Yes, the soviet union had aspects of an extremely reactionary, evolian, state. And Lenin pissed off every orthodox marxist on the planet, essentially. They had more reactionary features than almost any western country. Combined with far left ones, because of sorel. But what made it *bad* is literally *that fucking simple*. It's because of *jews*. If the ussr had *no jews*, it would be completely and perfectly fine. It would be "third positionist" even. Because that's the thin line that separates the third position from marxism leninism. Jews.