You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
devotech2 on scored.co
6 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
I think that the key is less in trying to make something entirely different from Tolkien, which is virtually impossible, and more in making something that's within 2-3 degrees of separation from his source material. Which will provide you with a healthy deal of originality, but will still be traditional fantasy.
Even if you go off of preexisting source material that Tolkien did not like at all, like the Arthurian legends, it's still connected to lord of the rings anyways, because lord of the rings had some celtic aspects to it. Even if we go to something that Tolkien didn't use at all in any capacity, like roman, Greek, or Slavic myth, it's *still* connected to the lord of the rings no matter what. Because of the whole indo european mythology connection, which feeds into the lord of the rings by proxy as it fed off of anglo saxon and norse myth. Which is, itself, connected to Slavic and mediterannean myth by common ancestry.
There's no way out of the lord of the rings connection unless you base your setting on something that isn't european at all.
Even if you go off of preexisting source material that Tolkien did not like at all, like the Arthurian legends, it's still connected to lord of the rings anyways, because lord of the rings had some celtic aspects to it. Even if we go to something that Tolkien didn't use at all in any capacity, like roman, Greek, or Slavic myth, it's *still* connected to the lord of the rings no matter what. Because of the whole indo european mythology connection, which feeds into the lord of the rings by proxy as it fed off of anglo saxon and norse myth. Which is, itself, connected to Slavic and mediterannean myth by common ancestry.
There's no way out of the lord of the rings connection unless you base your setting on something that isn't european at all.