You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
PurestEvil on scored.co
5 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)
> This may shock you but Jesus was a Jew named Yeshua
Clearly not the hand-rubbing, subversive, traitorous, liberal-communist ones as the jews of today. The jews of today are Canaanites and Khazars.
> Olive or tan skin and dark features.
We wuz Jeesuz n' sheeeeeeit! 2 millennia ago Northern Africa was inhabited by Whites, and the pharaohs were also Whites.
> The depiction of Jesus as a white guy is debated heavily
Yeah, by jews and other subhumans. It's not "debated", it's a concept that is under siege by foreigners who hate our race.
> So your point about Jesus not wanting whites to go extinct is certifiably insane.
Replace "Whites" with "believers" then. Does it make it 100% reasonable now even for you?
> The modern term "white" makes no sense from a historical lens.
Skin color and average IQ heavily correlate, as skin color is a strong indicator of race. Evolutionarily speaking, environments with high sun exposure caused a preference of darker skin color and required less intelligence. Environments with less required brighter skin color (to absorb more sunlight) and required more intelligence (dealing with winters).
> First of all, Jesus if anything professed how little in this world matters, only the "next".
So why bother about anything then? About commandments? About sin? Only as a vehicle to get to the afterlife? So you can use drugs, abandon your children, litter, not care about the environment, subjugate to whatever raping and killing invaders there are, be completely careless and irresponsible, get yourself enslaved and killed without resistance, maybe starve out of laziness, as long as you don't steal and kill? Ah, just be a good guy and let your wife get raped and killed.
Absolute subversive hippie bullshit.
> Committing atrocities to "save your species" is ridiculous.
The communist jews have killed tens of millions of White Christians via slave labor that was so brutal that it often ended in death by exhaustion. It was accompanied by a century of severe censorship and red terror, a looming fear that anyone could vanish overnight, arrested by jewish secret police, never to be seen again. And the same jews (who suffered no consequences) now genocide us by injecting all sorts of subhumans into our countries to genetically, culturally destroy us.
Do you think it would have been good and fair to stop the communist genocide of our people committed by jews by force?
> Secondly, just to educate you
You are in no position to educate.
> God tells Adam & Eve, "if you eat the fruit, you will surely die"
Which was true. They became mortal when they were expelled from the Garden of Eden.
> it was God not the serpent that gave Eve the false statement
What a peculiar, jewish thing to say...
> There's nothing that God created that is worthy of destruction by virtue of what it is.
So maximum cuck-mode is the peak of virtue then?
> neither stance justifies the eradication if anything or anyone.
Do not make assumptions about scientific-atheist stances. From a Darwinian perspective our gene pool is under attack by hostile invaders and parasites, and unless we eliminate the threat, we are doomed to lose our set of genes, aka *we lose*. The minimum is large scale expulsion, but to assume that will happen without conflict is foolish. There is no peaceful solution, and jews have caused this. And for that jews do not deserve to be treated peacefully.
Clearly not the hand-rubbing, subversive, traitorous, liberal-communist ones as the jews of today. The jews of today are Canaanites and Khazars.
> Olive or tan skin and dark features.
We wuz Jeesuz n' sheeeeeeit! 2 millennia ago Northern Africa was inhabited by Whites, and the pharaohs were also Whites.
> The depiction of Jesus as a white guy is debated heavily
Yeah, by jews and other subhumans. It's not "debated", it's a concept that is under siege by foreigners who hate our race.
> So your point about Jesus not wanting whites to go extinct is certifiably insane.
Replace "Whites" with "believers" then. Does it make it 100% reasonable now even for you?
> The modern term "white" makes no sense from a historical lens.
Skin color and average IQ heavily correlate, as skin color is a strong indicator of race. Evolutionarily speaking, environments with high sun exposure caused a preference of darker skin color and required less intelligence. Environments with less required brighter skin color (to absorb more sunlight) and required more intelligence (dealing with winters).
> First of all, Jesus if anything professed how little in this world matters, only the "next".
So why bother about anything then? About commandments? About sin? Only as a vehicle to get to the afterlife? So you can use drugs, abandon your children, litter, not care about the environment, subjugate to whatever raping and killing invaders there are, be completely careless and irresponsible, get yourself enslaved and killed without resistance, maybe starve out of laziness, as long as you don't steal and kill? Ah, just be a good guy and let your wife get raped and killed.
Absolute subversive hippie bullshit.
> Committing atrocities to "save your species" is ridiculous.
The communist jews have killed tens of millions of White Christians via slave labor that was so brutal that it often ended in death by exhaustion. It was accompanied by a century of severe censorship and red terror, a looming fear that anyone could vanish overnight, arrested by jewish secret police, never to be seen again. And the same jews (who suffered no consequences) now genocide us by injecting all sorts of subhumans into our countries to genetically, culturally destroy us.
Do you think it would have been good and fair to stop the communist genocide of our people committed by jews by force?
> Secondly, just to educate you
You are in no position to educate.
> God tells Adam & Eve, "if you eat the fruit, you will surely die"
Which was true. They became mortal when they were expelled from the Garden of Eden.
> it was God not the serpent that gave Eve the false statement
What a peculiar, jewish thing to say...
> There's nothing that God created that is worthy of destruction by virtue of what it is.
So maximum cuck-mode is the peak of virtue then?
> neither stance justifies the eradication if anything or anyone.
Do not make assumptions about scientific-atheist stances. From a Darwinian perspective our gene pool is under attack by hostile invaders and parasites, and unless we eliminate the threat, we are doomed to lose our set of genes, aka *we lose*. The minimum is large scale expulsion, but to assume that will happen without conflict is foolish. There is no peaceful solution, and jews have caused this. And for that jews do not deserve to be treated peacefully.