You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-2
Tmntnyc on scored.co
6 days ago-2 points(+0/-0/-2Score on mirror)2 children
> Did Jesus want us, Whites, to go extinct and have the worshipers of Satan (jews) run what is left? Is that it? Are we just going full cuck mode
This may shock you but Jesus was a Jew named Yeshua and he was born of a Jewish mother named Miriam and his father was God. They lived in 1st Century BC Galilee a region in Israel/Palestine and was a vassal state under the thumb of the Roman Empire. As a Jew, he probably looked like the other Jews. Olive or tan skin and dark features. The depiction of Jesus as a white guy is debated heavily because they were made by Europeans 1000 years later, but Jesus was a middle easterner by modern definition. So your point about Jesus not wanting whites to go extinct is certifiably insane. The modern term "white" makes no sense from a historical lens. If you travel to Europe, there is no distinction of white like there is in America. Slavs, Baltics, Germans, Anglos, Afghans, Persians, all would be considered "white" by their skin color by American standards, but nothing in those countries would place any of those people in any category that ties them together as the same race. So yeah, Jesus wouldn't fucking give a shit about races of people.
It's weird how you weave in religious rhetoric with Bible thumping nonsense. You talk about genetic maps and then go on to day Jesus wouldn't want worshippers of Satan to run what is left. First of all, Jesus if anything professed how little in this world matters, only the "next". Committing atrocities to "save your species" is ridiculous. If you are an actual Christian then you know there has to be an "end of days"/Armageddon that is pre-ordained.
Secondly, just to educate you, there is no real Satan in the Old Testament, at least not how Christians describe him since the Middle Ages. Prior to the rise of the catholic church in the middle ages, there was no real central source of all evil in the cosmos. Sin was in the hearts of man since day fucking 1. If you actually read Genesis, particularly the part with the Serpent and Eve, do you know what actually transpired? God tells Adam & Eve, "if you eat the fruit, you will surely die". When the Serpent tells Eve to eat the fruit and she says "the lord sayeth if we eat the fruit we will surely die", the serpent responds with "this is the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, if you eat it you won't die, you will gain the knowledge of good and evil". The church says the serpent lied but it's really fucking contradictory that the serpent was accused of being the deceiver when literally it was God not the serpent that gave Eve the false statement. And yet this was the ontology of "Satan" in the Christianity. Lucifer/Satan existed in the old testament but he was just a "prosecutor" in God's heavenly court, to test and challenge mankind. In fact there's no actual text in the old testament for Hell. In all probability it's a fucking made up thing like Hades/Underworld to scare kids into obeying their mothers.
> If accepting defeat and extinction is the "good thing to do", then I choose evil. If saving my people, my race, by doing the dirty deeds nobody wants to do means having to go to hell, then it's a worthy sacrifice. Everything else would be selfishness and cowardice
It's just wild you'd say this but think this is what Jesus or God wants. Sound more like a fucking psychopath Muslim than anything to be honest. "Worthy sacrifice", if you actually read the fucking source material you're referencing, it says multiple times that this world is irrelevant and salvation comes from being fair, kind, merciful, having virtue and respect for all of God's creations. It doesn't say to fucking annihilate your enemies in God's name. Even God didn't annihilate the Egyptians or the Babylonians for their transgressions, only the specific wicked ones and after multiple divine warnings. There's nothing that God created that is worthy of destruction by virtue of what it is. Mosquitos, parasites, leeches, viruses, bacteria, all have a purpose in ecosystem. So whether you're a strict biology nut or a religious zealot, neither stance justifies the eradication if anything or anyone.
6 days ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
So off base. God didn’t lie to Adam and Eve. No believer could come to that conclusion. They would die because of their sin of disobedience..
Also, God commanded the Israelites to annihilate the Canaanites so you’re wrong about that, too. Clearly not a believer, but you know enough to deceive those who are weak in the faith.
> The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”
> “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman. “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
Did Adam and Eve die directly from eating the fruit itself or did they learn the knowledge of good and evil? The serpent literally told the truth in that passage and it was God who lied. You'd have to make a huge stretch to say "well what God meant is that he would doom Adam and Eve by giving them a shorter life span after eating the apple as a punishment" which would be a stretch and not accurate to the original text.
The serpent was punished not for lying but for tempting Eve by telling her the truth of the fruit, which God had withheld to prevent them from consuming it.
Its like you tell your kids not to go into your room where your guns are not because there are things in there that could injure them but because a monster will eat them. And I tell them "a monster won't eat you, that's just where your dad puts his guns". How would I be the liar in that situation??
> This may shock you but Jesus was a Jew named Yeshua
Clearly not the hand-rubbing, subversive, traitorous, liberal-communist ones as the jews of today. The jews of today are Canaanites and Khazars.
> Olive or tan skin and dark features.
We wuz Jeesuz n' sheeeeeeit! 2 millennia ago Northern Africa was inhabited by Whites, and the pharaohs were also Whites.
> The depiction of Jesus as a white guy is debated heavily
Yeah, by jews and other subhumans. It's not "debated", it's a concept that is under siege by foreigners who hate our race.
> So your point about Jesus not wanting whites to go extinct is certifiably insane.
Replace "Whites" with "believers" then. Does it make it 100% reasonable now even for you?
> The modern term "white" makes no sense from a historical lens.
Skin color and average IQ heavily correlate, as skin color is a strong indicator of race. Evolutionarily speaking, environments with high sun exposure caused a preference of darker skin color and required less intelligence. Environments with less required brighter skin color (to absorb more sunlight) and required more intelligence (dealing with winters).
> First of all, Jesus if anything professed how little in this world matters, only the "next".
So why bother about anything then? About commandments? About sin? Only as a vehicle to get to the afterlife? So you can use drugs, abandon your children, litter, not care about the environment, subjugate to whatever raping and killing invaders there are, be completely careless and irresponsible, get yourself enslaved and killed without resistance, maybe starve out of laziness, as long as you don't steal and kill? Ah, just be a good guy and let your wife get raped and killed.
Absolute subversive hippie bullshit.
> Committing atrocities to "save your species" is ridiculous.
The communist jews have killed tens of millions of White Christians via slave labor that was so brutal that it often ended in death by exhaustion. It was accompanied by a century of severe censorship and red terror, a looming fear that anyone could vanish overnight, arrested by jewish secret police, never to be seen again. And the same jews (who suffered no consequences) now genocide us by injecting all sorts of subhumans into our countries to genetically, culturally destroy us.
Do you think it would have been good and fair to stop the communist genocide of our people committed by jews by force?
> Secondly, just to educate you
You are in no position to educate.
> God tells Adam & Eve, "if you eat the fruit, you will surely die"
Which was true. They became mortal when they were expelled from the Garden of Eden.
> it was God not the serpent that gave Eve the false statement
What a peculiar, jewish thing to say...
> There's nothing that God created that is worthy of destruction by virtue of what it is.
So maximum cuck-mode is the peak of virtue then?
> neither stance justifies the eradication if anything or anyone.
Do not make assumptions about scientific-atheist stances. From a Darwinian perspective our gene pool is under attack by hostile invaders and parasites, and unless we eliminate the threat, we are doomed to lose our set of genes, aka *we lose*. The minimum is large scale expulsion, but to assume that will happen without conflict is foolish. There is no peaceful solution, and jews have caused this. And for that jews do not deserve to be treated peacefully.
This may shock you but Jesus was a Jew named Yeshua and he was born of a Jewish mother named Miriam and his father was God. They lived in 1st Century BC Galilee a region in Israel/Palestine and was a vassal state under the thumb of the Roman Empire. As a Jew, he probably looked like the other Jews. Olive or tan skin and dark features. The depiction of Jesus as a white guy is debated heavily because they were made by Europeans 1000 years later, but Jesus was a middle easterner by modern definition. So your point about Jesus not wanting whites to go extinct is certifiably insane. The modern term "white" makes no sense from a historical lens. If you travel to Europe, there is no distinction of white like there is in America. Slavs, Baltics, Germans, Anglos, Afghans, Persians, all would be considered "white" by their skin color by American standards, but nothing in those countries would place any of those people in any category that ties them together as the same race. So yeah, Jesus wouldn't fucking give a shit about races of people.
It's weird how you weave in religious rhetoric with Bible thumping nonsense. You talk about genetic maps and then go on to day Jesus wouldn't want worshippers of Satan to run what is left. First of all, Jesus if anything professed how little in this world matters, only the "next". Committing atrocities to "save your species" is ridiculous. If you are an actual Christian then you know there has to be an "end of days"/Armageddon that is pre-ordained.
Secondly, just to educate you, there is no real Satan in the Old Testament, at least not how Christians describe him since the Middle Ages. Prior to the rise of the catholic church in the middle ages, there was no real central source of all evil in the cosmos. Sin was in the hearts of man since day fucking 1. If you actually read Genesis, particularly the part with the Serpent and Eve, do you know what actually transpired? God tells Adam & Eve, "if you eat the fruit, you will surely die". When the Serpent tells Eve to eat the fruit and she says "the lord sayeth if we eat the fruit we will surely die", the serpent responds with "this is the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, if you eat it you won't die, you will gain the knowledge of good and evil". The church says the serpent lied but it's really fucking contradictory that the serpent was accused of being the deceiver when literally it was God not the serpent that gave Eve the false statement. And yet this was the ontology of "Satan" in the Christianity. Lucifer/Satan existed in the old testament but he was just a "prosecutor" in God's heavenly court, to test and challenge mankind. In fact there's no actual text in the old testament for Hell. In all probability it's a fucking made up thing like Hades/Underworld to scare kids into obeying their mothers.
> If accepting defeat and extinction is the "good thing to do", then I choose evil. If saving my people, my race, by doing the dirty deeds nobody wants to do means having to go to hell, then it's a worthy sacrifice. Everything else would be selfishness and cowardice
It's just wild you'd say this but think this is what Jesus or God wants. Sound more like a fucking psychopath Muslim than anything to be honest. "Worthy sacrifice", if you actually read the fucking source material you're referencing, it says multiple times that this world is irrelevant and salvation comes from being fair, kind, merciful, having virtue and respect for all of God's creations. It doesn't say to fucking annihilate your enemies in God's name. Even God didn't annihilate the Egyptians or the Babylonians for their transgressions, only the specific wicked ones and after multiple divine warnings. There's nothing that God created that is worthy of destruction by virtue of what it is. Mosquitos, parasites, leeches, viruses, bacteria, all have a purpose in ecosystem. So whether you're a strict biology nut or a religious zealot, neither stance justifies the eradication if anything or anyone.
Also, God commanded the Israelites to annihilate the Canaanites so you’re wrong about that, too. Clearly not a believer, but you know enough to deceive those who are weak in the faith.
> The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”
> “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman. “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
Did Adam and Eve die directly from eating the fruit itself or did they learn the knowledge of good and evil? The serpent literally told the truth in that passage and it was God who lied. You'd have to make a huge stretch to say "well what God meant is that he would doom Adam and Eve by giving them a shorter life span after eating the apple as a punishment" which would be a stretch and not accurate to the original text.
The serpent was punished not for lying but for tempting Eve by telling her the truth of the fruit, which God had withheld to prevent them from consuming it.
Its like you tell your kids not to go into your room where your guns are not because there are things in there that could injure them but because a monster will eat them. And I tell them "a monster won't eat you, that's just where your dad puts his guns". How would I be the liar in that situation??
Clearly not the hand-rubbing, subversive, traitorous, liberal-communist ones as the jews of today. The jews of today are Canaanites and Khazars.
> Olive or tan skin and dark features.
We wuz Jeesuz n' sheeeeeeit! 2 millennia ago Northern Africa was inhabited by Whites, and the pharaohs were also Whites.
> The depiction of Jesus as a white guy is debated heavily
Yeah, by jews and other subhumans. It's not "debated", it's a concept that is under siege by foreigners who hate our race.
> So your point about Jesus not wanting whites to go extinct is certifiably insane.
Replace "Whites" with "believers" then. Does it make it 100% reasonable now even for you?
> The modern term "white" makes no sense from a historical lens.
Skin color and average IQ heavily correlate, as skin color is a strong indicator of race. Evolutionarily speaking, environments with high sun exposure caused a preference of darker skin color and required less intelligence. Environments with less required brighter skin color (to absorb more sunlight) and required more intelligence (dealing with winters).
> First of all, Jesus if anything professed how little in this world matters, only the "next".
So why bother about anything then? About commandments? About sin? Only as a vehicle to get to the afterlife? So you can use drugs, abandon your children, litter, not care about the environment, subjugate to whatever raping and killing invaders there are, be completely careless and irresponsible, get yourself enslaved and killed without resistance, maybe starve out of laziness, as long as you don't steal and kill? Ah, just be a good guy and let your wife get raped and killed.
Absolute subversive hippie bullshit.
> Committing atrocities to "save your species" is ridiculous.
The communist jews have killed tens of millions of White Christians via slave labor that was so brutal that it often ended in death by exhaustion. It was accompanied by a century of severe censorship and red terror, a looming fear that anyone could vanish overnight, arrested by jewish secret police, never to be seen again. And the same jews (who suffered no consequences) now genocide us by injecting all sorts of subhumans into our countries to genetically, culturally destroy us.
Do you think it would have been good and fair to stop the communist genocide of our people committed by jews by force?
> Secondly, just to educate you
You are in no position to educate.
> God tells Adam & Eve, "if you eat the fruit, you will surely die"
Which was true. They became mortal when they were expelled from the Garden of Eden.
> it was God not the serpent that gave Eve the false statement
What a peculiar, jewish thing to say...
> There's nothing that God created that is worthy of destruction by virtue of what it is.
So maximum cuck-mode is the peak of virtue then?
> neither stance justifies the eradication if anything or anyone.
Do not make assumptions about scientific-atheist stances. From a Darwinian perspective our gene pool is under attack by hostile invaders and parasites, and unless we eliminate the threat, we are doomed to lose our set of genes, aka *we lose*. The minimum is large scale expulsion, but to assume that will happen without conflict is foolish. There is no peaceful solution, and jews have caused this. And for that jews do not deserve to be treated peacefully.