You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
9
devotech2 on scored.co
7 days ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)3 children
Countries did take kike "refugees". Spain did (I fucking hate Franco), Britain did, the US did, the soviets did... "officially" at least, Japan did (surprisingly), Italy did for a bit.
Why didn't *most* european countries take them though? It's literally because jews fucking suck. Why else?
7 days ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)2 children
This is not true.
The US took SOME jews, and the other countries did too. Then, policies shifted and they told Hitler he can't export jews to them anymore. So Hitler said he would send them all back to Palestine, and then the nations decided that would be intolerable.
In short, jews declared war on Germany, Germany tried to separate from them, but jews made sure they couldn't.
Of course, a few years later and all the nations were more than happy to do what Hitler wanted to do in the first place -- ship jews into Palestine.
7 days ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)2 children
madagascar. and then the vast plains of eastern europe (concentration camps were just fenced-in villages). most jews were killed by locals or post-trotzky slightly-less-jewish soviets, the german soldiers were still comparatively compassionate (because that is one of the strengths of the White race, its compassion and closeness to God Almighty). and while, yes, all jews, we have to remember that the "highmen" jews sold out the "lowmen" jews, so the shop owners and malnourished folks are 99% common folks who "just happened to be jews".
there is only two good jews: the jew who is no longer a jew because he turned to Christ in the first 300 years after He walked the earth; and a dead jew. do not settle for anything less. convert and repent, or die. simple as.
7 days ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)3 children
As a side point, I don't believe that any real Jews have existed from around 500 AD on. The "Jews" of Europe may have had some distant drop of blood, or not, but I wouldn't even call them Jews, really.
they aren't racial jews, or the jews of old, or hebrews, or israelites. they are canaanite carthaginian phoenician phrygian heathen filth that propagates via cultish religion more so than racialism; while conveniently using the race stick as an excuse for their disgusting actions.
that's like calling someone a racist for being against islam.
This is my opinion too, both biblical prophecy and historical documents (both from the original Jews themselves) indicate Judea was completely destroyed and its inhabitants either were scattered and then assimilated to other nations or completely died off. The Synagogue of Satan and their Talmud conveniently popped up right as (((Gnosticism))) allegedly disappeared from History, and yet a substantial portion of Talmudic beliefs (especially those from the Zohar) are straight out of Gnosticism. Gnosticism was the original shape-changer religion, while some more benign forms of it did exist, at its worst it was a completely Satanic Ideology directly opposed to the God of the Bible, and it was so thoroughly antagonistic to Christianity that Gnostics actually had the gall to pretend to be Christians and then behave so degenerately to tar actual Christians by association. A lot of the work of the early Church fathers was not just against the remnant of the Jews, but also against Gnostic subversion. Its possible that as the actual jews died off, the few that remained joined with the gnostics to continue to antagonize Christianity.
The Romans burned all the records of the ancestry of the jews. No one has any records dating before 100 AD or so.
In the First Century, if you read the New Testament closely, it's clear that a very large number of people living in Judea were not descended from Judah. Those people who were descended from Judah are explicitly named so.
I think a large part of the confusion is that when Israel left Egypt, it wasn't just pure-blooded descendants of Israel in their party. In fact, those people probably weren't even a significant portion of the population. Abraham was known to lead a nation with significant enough numbers that he slaughtered the kings in Canaan. Since then Isaac and Jacob's wealth was greatly expanded, making them royalty of an entire nation not blood-related to them. Hence, why they had to find people to marry in a far away land. So if people kept reproducing, by the time Moses leads the people of Israel out of Egypt, the vast majority aren't even related to Israel by blood.
Carry forward and read the rest of the OT and it's clear that people would join the nation of Israel, sometimes one at a time, but sometimes entire cities. Reading the account in Ruth it's also very clear that the true-blooded descendants of Israel were inter-marrying with other people, contrary to Moses' commandments not to commit adultery. So by the time of the exile, Babylon noted that they took all the descendants of Judah, and then they also took the artisans and engineers and such, leaving only the poor behind -- who likely had little or no blood of Judah in them. Then when the jews came back under the Persian Empire, only a small portion came and found themselves surrounded by Gentiles who had no relation to Israel at all, not even the nation of Israel. And then fast forward until the Greeks conquer the area, and now you have a bunch of Greeks moving in and taking over, and what few descendants of Judah were left are marrying them. By the time Jesus is born, you could probably count on two hands the families that could claim descent from Judah, and even then, Jesus' line was corrupted by Ruth.
So after the Romans burned the geneaology, it was over. No one could legally claim to be descended from Judah. Even if they could, they likely had none of his blood in them. Jesus was truly the last true descendant of Judah.
Paul said being a Jew was in your heart, and that measure is probably even more damning for those who claim Jewishness from a religious aspect today, as they reject the Torah, reject the Messiah, and follow paganized apostate Jewish traditions.
The problem with Jews is that you can’t trust them on that. See gates of Toledo, where the king said all his subjects had to convert or leave. They acted as converts for almost 150 years, to then open the gates for the approaching Muslims and be extra cruel to the captured Christians because they "oppressed them before".
Hitler NEVER wanted to "kill all the jews". He didn't even want to "kill all the commies." He was a PACIFIST in every sense of the word. It was his one weakness.
He truly believed that he could solve the problems in his nation by peacefully negotiating and working out issues.
It wasn't until much later that he started to realize how wrong he was, but by then it was too late.
The Anglo-Saxon people will not repeat the same mistake. When we wake up, we will not be seeking peaceful resolutions, but retribution and justice. We are one of the few european races who have no qualms about committing genocide and being known as bloodthirsty savages when the occasion calls for it.
The German people, however, tempered by brutal warfare throughout the medieval and even through the modern period, are far more kind and generous and welcoming than we have ever been. I appreciate them for it but I find them a bit naive.
It was also japanese Christians who told the Japanese shintoists and Buddhists how much jews fucking suck in the first place. Else they would have ran all over that country already
theyre quite literally subversive scamming gypsy slavers who worship demons and everyone knew it. oh gee wow wonder why no one wanted them in their nation? what a puzzler.
Why didn't *most* european countries take them though? It's literally because jews fucking suck. Why else?
The US took SOME jews, and the other countries did too. Then, policies shifted and they told Hitler he can't export jews to them anymore. So Hitler said he would send them all back to Palestine, and then the nations decided that would be intolerable.
In short, jews declared war on Germany, Germany tried to separate from them, but jews made sure they couldn't.
Of course, a few years later and all the nations were more than happy to do what Hitler wanted to do in the first place -- ship jews into Palestine.
there is only two good jews: the jew who is no longer a jew because he turned to Christ in the first 300 years after He walked the earth; and a dead jew. do not settle for anything less. convert and repent, or die. simple as.
that's like calling someone a racist for being against islam.
In the First Century, if you read the New Testament closely, it's clear that a very large number of people living in Judea were not descended from Judah. Those people who were descended from Judah are explicitly named so.
I think a large part of the confusion is that when Israel left Egypt, it wasn't just pure-blooded descendants of Israel in their party. In fact, those people probably weren't even a significant portion of the population. Abraham was known to lead a nation with significant enough numbers that he slaughtered the kings in Canaan. Since then Isaac and Jacob's wealth was greatly expanded, making them royalty of an entire nation not blood-related to them. Hence, why they had to find people to marry in a far away land. So if people kept reproducing, by the time Moses leads the people of Israel out of Egypt, the vast majority aren't even related to Israel by blood.
Carry forward and read the rest of the OT and it's clear that people would join the nation of Israel, sometimes one at a time, but sometimes entire cities. Reading the account in Ruth it's also very clear that the true-blooded descendants of Israel were inter-marrying with other people, contrary to Moses' commandments not to commit adultery. So by the time of the exile, Babylon noted that they took all the descendants of Judah, and then they also took the artisans and engineers and such, leaving only the poor behind -- who likely had little or no blood of Judah in them. Then when the jews came back under the Persian Empire, only a small portion came and found themselves surrounded by Gentiles who had no relation to Israel at all, not even the nation of Israel. And then fast forward until the Greeks conquer the area, and now you have a bunch of Greeks moving in and taking over, and what few descendants of Judah were left are marrying them. By the time Jesus is born, you could probably count on two hands the families that could claim descent from Judah, and even then, Jesus' line was corrupted by Ruth.
So after the Romans burned the geneaology, it was over. No one could legally claim to be descended from Judah. Even if they could, they likely had none of his blood in them. Jesus was truly the last true descendant of Judah.
i don't. all must turn to Christ, or else.
Hitler NEVER wanted to "kill all the jews". He didn't even want to "kill all the commies." He was a PACIFIST in every sense of the word. It was his one weakness.
He truly believed that he could solve the problems in his nation by peacefully negotiating and working out issues.
It wasn't until much later that he started to realize how wrong he was, but by then it was too late.
The Anglo-Saxon people will not repeat the same mistake. When we wake up, we will not be seeking peaceful resolutions, but retribution and justice. We are one of the few european races who have no qualms about committing genocide and being known as bloodthirsty savages when the occasion calls for it.
The German people, however, tempered by brutal warfare throughout the medieval and even through the modern period, are far more kind and generous and welcoming than we have ever been. I appreciate them for it but I find them a bit naive.