> Please answer with concrete facts, not just "Jews suck".
because jews suck. here is why:
- they embed themselves into a host country, aggressively breeding their "beautiful women" into the natives thereby assuring the dominance and continuance of their heathen, pagan, post-flood age daemon cult. it's all about that fertility and femininity and female dominance and blablabla. if they weren't completely gay, they'd rule that the faith is passed through the father, but alas poor jewrick, i barely nose him.
- they don't work, they "work". pawnbrokers, JEWlery shops, banking, overhead and merchandising. anything that has to do with money, usury, lending.
- they actually poison wells (no, seriously, they do)
- they abduct, rape and ritually murder-sacrifice and exsanguinate children mostly boys, and probably women as well (be they virgin or not)
- they subvert academia, politics, economics and faith
at best, we are wrong and they are "just" disruptive, greedy and subversive with a strong in-group preference for an in-group that is unlikeable. at worst, everything is true.
whatever, the list goes on and on, jews suck. because jews. it's all so tiresome Everystein. Singleberg. Timeowitz.
because jews suck. here is why:
- they embed themselves into a host country, aggressively breeding their "beautiful women" into the natives thereby assuring the dominance and continuance of their heathen, pagan, post-flood age daemon cult. it's all about that fertility and femininity and female dominance and blablabla. if they weren't completely gay, they'd rule that the faith is passed through the father, but alas poor jewrick, i barely nose him.
- they don't work, they "work". pawnbrokers, JEWlery shops, banking, overhead and merchandising. anything that has to do with money, usury, lending.
- they actually poison wells (no, seriously, they do)
- they abduct, rape and ritually murder-sacrifice and exsanguinate children mostly boys, and probably women as well (be they virgin or not)
- they subvert academia, politics, economics and faith
at best, we are wrong and they are "just" disruptive, greedy and subversive with a strong in-group preference for an in-group that is unlikeable. at worst, everything is true.
whatever, the list goes on and on, jews suck. because jews. it's all so tiresome Everystein. Singleberg. Timeowitz.
Why didn't *most* european countries take them though? It's literally because jews fucking suck. Why else?
The US took SOME jews, and the other countries did too. Then, policies shifted and they told Hitler he can't export jews to them anymore. So Hitler said he would send them all back to Palestine, and then the nations decided that would be intolerable.
In short, jews declared war on Germany, Germany tried to separate from them, but jews made sure they couldn't.
Of course, a few years later and all the nations were more than happy to do what Hitler wanted to do in the first place -- ship jews into Palestine.
there is only two good jews: the jew who is no longer a jew because he turned to Christ in the first 300 years after He walked the earth; and a dead jew. do not settle for anything less. convert and repent, or die. simple as.
that's like calling someone a racist for being against islam.
In the First Century, if you read the New Testament closely, it's clear that a very large number of people living in Judea were not descended from Judah. Those people who were descended from Judah are explicitly named so.
I think a large part of the confusion is that when Israel left Egypt, it wasn't just pure-blooded descendants of Israel in their party. In fact, those people probably weren't even a significant portion of the population. Abraham was known to lead a nation with significant enough numbers that he slaughtered the kings in Canaan. Since then Isaac and Jacob's wealth was greatly expanded, making them royalty of an entire nation not blood-related to them. Hence, why they had to find people to marry in a far away land. So if people kept reproducing, by the time Moses leads the people of Israel out of Egypt, the vast majority aren't even related to Israel by blood.
Carry forward and read the rest of the OT and it's clear that people would join the nation of Israel, sometimes one at a time, but sometimes entire cities. Reading the account in Ruth it's also very clear that the true-blooded descendants of Israel were inter-marrying with other people, contrary to Moses' commandments not to commit adultery. So by the time of the exile, Babylon noted that they took all the descendants of Judah, and then they also took the artisans and engineers and such, leaving only the poor behind -- who likely had little or no blood of Judah in them. Then when the jews came back under the Persian Empire, only a small portion came and found themselves surrounded by Gentiles who had no relation to Israel at all, not even the nation of Israel. And then fast forward until the Greeks conquer the area, and now you have a bunch of Greeks moving in and taking over, and what few descendants of Judah were left are marrying them. By the time Jesus is born, you could probably count on two hands the families that could claim descent from Judah, and even then, Jesus' line was corrupted by Ruth.
So after the Romans burned the geneaology, it was over. No one could legally claim to be descended from Judah. Even if they could, they likely had none of his blood in them. Jesus was truly the last true descendant of Judah.
i don't. all must turn to Christ, or else.
Hitler NEVER wanted to "kill all the jews". He didn't even want to "kill all the commies." He was a PACIFIST in every sense of the word. It was his one weakness.
He truly believed that he could solve the problems in his nation by peacefully negotiating and working out issues.
It wasn't until much later that he started to realize how wrong he was, but by then it was too late.
The Anglo-Saxon people will not repeat the same mistake. When we wake up, we will not be seeking peaceful resolutions, but retribution and justice. We are one of the few european races who have no qualms about committing genocide and being known as bloodthirsty savages when the occasion calls for it.
The German people, however, tempered by brutal warfare throughout the medieval and even through the modern period, are far more kind and generous and welcoming than we have ever been. I appreciate them for it but I find them a bit naive.