You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-1
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
2 months ago-1 points(+0/-1)2 children
>I genuine cannot finish unless I'm thinking of p*ssy or thighs or t1ts, and I feel like I've been built the wrong way around.
I mean, yeah? Women are objectively hotter. I forget who said it but a woman's body is a Ferrari; stylish, sleek, and if you aren't careful it'll leave you mangled in some lonesome ditch.
A man's body is a 1997 Ford F-150; durable, get's the job done, but absolutely no one is bragging about it.
The only women I know genuinely attracked to men have fetishes about being rapes by monsters.
2 months ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Yeah this is a purely male-brain take on the sexes. And I say that as a male myself. Women are the "fairer sex" and the object of sexualization because men have historically always held power, we literally lived in patricarchal societies, and so the sexual viewpoint of men has come to be seen as the default: Women are Attractive™ while men are only seen as attractive in the eyes of women. As a straight woman, my wife recognizes when women are attractive because she's been socially conditioned to notice those traits, but she recognizes when men are attractive because she is attracted to them. But as a straight man, recognizing when a man is attractive is much more difficult for me simply because society hasn't conditioned me to notice that.
>Yeah this is a purely male-brain take on the sexes
What a wordy way of saying I'm correct.
Women are *literally* sex objects. That's their main purpose and their entire body is set up for reproduction. They have boobs for feeding, they can't run because their hips are so wide to accomodate birthing babies and their faces tend towards symetry so that they can bond with children more easily.
Every human instinctively recognizes and is attracted to these features when they are properly developed.
Men's bodies are general in nature because men need to do all sorts of different things. We aren't biologically setup to inspire feeling of protectiveness in others (which is why women appear more child-like in terms of facial structure, btw, it's the same mechanism), we are built to do useful work. That's why women are attracted to attitude over any particular physical trait.
What do men look for in women, physically? Boobs (related to reproduction), ass and legs (related to hip width), maybe hair (related to general vitality and good genetics). You ask a man what he likes to see, and it's one of these or he's into feet or some garbage. *Women will tell you the same thing*
Ask a woman what is the most attractive characteristic is on a man, what's she going to say? Who knows? It could be one of dozens of characteristics because there's nothing specifically attractive about men. Most of the time they won't even mention something physical and it'll be "sense of humour" or "confidence" which are stand-ins for competence. That's what women want out of men, end of story.
>Women are the "fairer sex" and the object of sexualization because men have historically always held power,
Did you learn this is a gender studies course? This is a retarded take in the extreme.
If I'm the patriarchy, why would I tell women that they're attractive? To inflate their egos and make it *harder* for men to impress them? Or would I tell them that *men* are attractive so that *they* pursue *me*?
No I didn't learn it in a gender studies course, I learned it by the fact, for 99% of human histroy, families were led by fathers, most monarchs were male, and most chief deities are male, you fucking idiot.
I mean, yeah? Women are objectively hotter. I forget who said it but a woman's body is a Ferrari; stylish, sleek, and if you aren't careful it'll leave you mangled in some lonesome ditch.
A man's body is a 1997 Ford F-150; durable, get's the job done, but absolutely no one is bragging about it.
The only women I know genuinely attracked to men have fetishes about being rapes by monsters.
Touch grass.
What a wordy way of saying I'm correct.
Women are *literally* sex objects. That's their main purpose and their entire body is set up for reproduction. They have boobs for feeding, they can't run because their hips are so wide to accomodate birthing babies and their faces tend towards symetry so that they can bond with children more easily.
Every human instinctively recognizes and is attracted to these features when they are properly developed.
Men's bodies are general in nature because men need to do all sorts of different things. We aren't biologically setup to inspire feeling of protectiveness in others (which is why women appear more child-like in terms of facial structure, btw, it's the same mechanism), we are built to do useful work. That's why women are attracted to attitude over any particular physical trait.
What do men look for in women, physically? Boobs (related to reproduction), ass and legs (related to hip width), maybe hair (related to general vitality and good genetics). You ask a man what he likes to see, and it's one of these or he's into feet or some garbage. *Women will tell you the same thing*
Ask a woman what is the most attractive characteristic is on a man, what's she going to say? Who knows? It could be one of dozens of characteristics because there's nothing specifically attractive about men. Most of the time they won't even mention something physical and it'll be "sense of humour" or "confidence" which are stand-ins for competence. That's what women want out of men, end of story.
>Women are the "fairer sex" and the object of sexualization because men have historically always held power,
Did you learn this is a gender studies course? This is a retarded take in the extreme.
If I'm the patriarchy, why would I tell women that they're attractive? To inflate their egos and make it *harder* for men to impress them? Or would I tell them that *men* are attractive so that *they* pursue *me*?