Zogbots today are something else.
(youtu.be)
all these women and faggots could easily be beaten by a few men with bats and nobody would dare to intervene
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
12 comments:
18
1 year ago
18 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+18Score on mirror
)
3 children
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
10
1 year ago
10 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+10Score on mirror
)
They may finally join in.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
1 year ago
3 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+3Score on mirror
)
1 child
What I was thinking, when are the people of the UK going to just start wrecking bobbies in the street?
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
1 year ago
3 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+3Score on mirror
)
They haven't done it yet so I don't think they ever will. The only anti-police uprising in bongland will be the new muslim natives killing the last few White cops.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
1 year ago
0 points
(+0
/
-0
)
1 child
They all need to be hung. That includes the women
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
1 year ago
0 points
(+0
/
-0
)
Oy vey, we're making them hung as fast as they sign up for surgery!!!
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
I don't know why they have a special mall law.
Australia, being based on British Law has a version of "behaviour likely to occasion a breach of the peace"
He's hooked on the "obstruction" part, which is not a necessary part of the law.
Under such laws if your behaviour is likely to cause *someone else to chimp out* no matter how reasonable you are being, you can be asked to move on, as in this case, or arrested - also as in this case.
_There is no right to free speech outside the USA_
[SUMMARY OFFENCES ACT 1966 - SECT 6](https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/soa1966189/s6.html)
Direction to move on
S. 6(1) amended by Nos 43/2011 s. 48(2), 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 160.2).
(1) A police officer, or a protective services officer on duty at a designated place, may give a direction to a person or persons in a public place to leave the public place, or part of the public place, if the police officer or protective services officer suspects on reasonable grounds that—
(a) the person is or persons are breaching, or likely to breach, the peace; or
(b) the person is or persons are endangering, or likely to endanger, the safety of any other person; or
(c) the behaviour of the person or persons is likely to cause injury to a person or damage to property or is otherwise a risk to public safety.
Australia, being based on British Law has a version of "behaviour likely to occasion a breach of the peace"
He's hooked on the "obstruction" part, which is not a necessary part of the law.
Under such laws if your behaviour is likely to cause *someone else to chimp out* no matter how reasonable you are being, you can be asked to move on, as in this case, or arrested - also as in this case.
_There is no right to free speech outside the USA_
[SUMMARY OFFENCES ACT 1966 - SECT 6](https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/soa1966189/s6.html)
Direction to move on
S. 6(1) amended by Nos 43/2011 s. 48(2), 37/2014 s. 10(Sch. item 160.2).
(1) A police officer, or a protective services officer on duty at a designated place, may give a direction to a person or persons in a public place to leave the public place, or part of the public place, if the police officer or protective services officer suspects on reasonable grounds that—
(a) the person is or persons are breaching, or likely to breach, the peace; or
(b) the person is or persons are endangering, or likely to endanger, the safety of any other person; or
(c) the behaviour of the person or persons is likely to cause injury to a person or damage to property or is otherwise a risk to public safety.
UK, French, Canada, Aussie cops all deserve fucking death man they seriously are such complete traitor faggots, even beyond our stupidass faggot cops.
Toast message