I also suspect the (((Civil Rights Movement))) has been heavily whitewashed in the same way they tried to whitewash the floyd riots.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
32 comments:
We saw the riots on TV in the 80s
Opinion polls on blacks dropped
We laughed when they lined up at the post office they burned down, expecting welfare checks
We watched them kill that truck driver and swore never to let our guard down
We cheered the rooftop koreans
Opinion polls on blacks dropped
We laughed when they lined up at the post office they burned down, expecting welfare checks
We watched them kill that truck driver and swore never to let our guard down
We cheered the rooftop koreans
"Steal This Book" by (((Abbie Hoffman))) contained detailed recipes on mixing various kinds of exposives and tips for evading legal prosecution (among other things); it was published in 1971.
Hoffman was later revealed to be working with the CIA.
Hoffman was later revealed to be working with the CIA.
Republicans won't arrest Democrats. They are too busy making biden's and Obama's leftist gains permanent. For example Obamacare and gay marriage are now permanent. The statues of White leaders are still torn down. Fags are still parading around. Abortion is still legal in most states. Republicans are leftists.
> Republicans are leftists
Worse. Republicans are Conservatives. They Conserve the Right to Conserve all of us into the fuxing soil.
The only thing Conservatives conserve is shiddy politics by their predecessors while looking big and strong for the cameras. Like lipstick on an orange pig.
Worse. Republicans are Conservatives. They Conserve the Right to Conserve all of us into the fuxing soil.
The only thing Conservatives conserve is shiddy politics by their predecessors while looking big and strong for the cameras. Like lipstick on an orange pig.
I keep seeing this tweet but no actual citations anywhere else.
Susan rosenberg
Chesa boudin
Kamala
Look up the links
Chesa boudin
Kamala
Look up the links
I know rosenberg is weather underground and who ended up running BLM
Also Bill Ayers who ended up becoming a professor in Chicago
Chesa boudin became da of pelosis district which is where kamala is da. He is the son of the driver and lookout for the brinks armored truck robbery where 2 police and a guard were murdered. Rosenberg planned the robbery. He was raised by weather underground bomb maker bill ayers.
Italy was a world wide economic powerhouse back in the 60s then the commies started a terrorist campaign now look at them today.
And it wasn't even new then. Most people have forgotten about the militant anarchists and communists who were doing terror attacks and attempting revolution all over the place in White countries in the early decades of the past century.
I'm sure there's plenty of ipz, berg, witz, and steins behind those if you dig a bit. For example, the anarchist who killed President Mckinney was recruited to anarchism by a Goldberg.
I'm sure there's plenty of ipz, berg, witz, and steins behind those if you dig a bit. For example, the anarchist who killed President Mckinney was recruited to anarchism by a Goldberg.
I know I post this in every one of these "Conservatives" threads, but it's still my favorite quote:
Robert Lewis Dabney
“It may be inferred again that the present movement for women’s rights will certainly prevail from the history of its only opponent, Northern conservatism. This [Northern conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt hath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom. It always when about to enter a protest very blandly informs the wild beast whose path it essays to stop, that its “bark is worse than its bite,” and that it only means to save its manners by enacting its decent role of resistance: The only practical purpose which it now subserves in American politics is to give enough exercise to Radicalism to keep it “in wind,” and to prevent its becoming pursy and lazy, from having nothing to whip.”
Robert Lewis Dabney
“It may be inferred again that the present movement for women’s rights will certainly prevail from the history of its only opponent, Northern conservatism. This [Northern conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt hath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom. It always when about to enter a protest very blandly informs the wild beast whose path it essays to stop, that its “bark is worse than its bite,” and that it only means to save its manners by enacting its decent role of resistance: The only practical purpose which it now subserves in American politics is to give enough exercise to Radicalism to keep it “in wind,” and to prevent its becoming pursy and lazy, from having nothing to whip.”
Meanwhile, The Right: 👶🏻🍼📑
It helps to have the jewish system on your side. Republicans go to jail for years without even having a trial over trespassing charges during a protest. Leftists bomb state and federal buildings and they end up getting pardoned by a president eventually, if they serve any jail time at all. There’s a pretty big difference in how the system treats right wing and left wing “radicals”, and for good reason, the left is ZOG’s useful idiot filled tool, whereas, the right actually sits in opposition to most everything ZOG wants for us as a society.
But I agree, the right behaves very different than the left, pussyish to some degree, but there are other factors like the right isn’t full of losers, we almost all have a job, and a lot of us have a family to take care of. The left doesn’t have much holding them back, let alone repercussions. The only way we see what the right is truly capable of is if the system breaks down, no law and order, just chaos.
Toast message
She went on to manage the finances of blm