You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
13
TallestSkil on scored.co
5 days ago13 points(+0/-0/+13Score on mirror)
**To a man, defense is an internal problem.** Physical strength, intelligence, and skill are required to keep you safe. A man endeavors to accomplish these things with the minimum effort, both physical and mental, because efficient use of calories is also vital to survival. When a man finds something that works best for him, he’s extremely reluctant to change from that thing because it would mean expending more calories to learn a new thing, establish new trust, feel confident in himself again, etc.
To this end, for example, I have a pair of shorts I like. Once I found that I liked them, I bought a dozen identical pairs. *Who knows if they’re going to stop making them.* What happens to me then? So now, if one fails, I have backups for the rest of my life, and they’re backups *I know.* I drive a 23 year old car. I use a 15 year old computer. I only stopped using my 10 year old phone because the battery lasted less than five minutes on a charge.
**To a woman, defense is an external problem.** It’s a man’s responsibility to defend her, in exchange for granting him her bloodline. She outsources her safety in all forms (physical, economic, emotional) to a man. But men don’t want women anymore because women were tricked into thinking they’re identical to men and so they told the government to punish men if their feelings were hurt.
In abandoning women–who do nothing but fuck around when left to their own devices–men abandoned their gaping holes and left gaping holes in women’s psyches. Bereft of their sense of safety, and often not even consciously comprehending what they’re lacking–only *that* they’re lacking something–women turn to objects to fill that hole. More specifically, they’ve been–subconsciously–told by jewish media, for decades, *“If I own many Things™, the hole will be filled. What I am lacking is quantity, not quality. Quality is oppression; quantity is liberation.”*
To this end, for example, I have a pair of shorts I like. Once I found that I liked them, I bought a dozen identical pairs. *Who knows if they’re going to stop making them.* What happens to me then? So now, if one fails, I have backups for the rest of my life, and they’re backups *I know.* I drive a 23 year old car. I use a 15 year old computer. I only stopped using my 10 year old phone because the battery lasted less than five minutes on a charge.
**To a woman, defense is an external problem.** It’s a man’s responsibility to defend her, in exchange for granting him her bloodline. She outsources her safety in all forms (physical, economic, emotional) to a man. But men don’t want women anymore because women were tricked into thinking they’re identical to men and so they told the government to punish men if their feelings were hurt.
In abandoning women–who do nothing but fuck around when left to their own devices–men abandoned their gaping holes and left gaping holes in women’s psyches. Bereft of their sense of safety, and often not even consciously comprehending what they’re lacking–only *that* they’re lacking something–women turn to objects to fill that hole. More specifically, they’ve been–subconsciously–told by jewish media, for decades, *“If I own many Things™, the hole will be filled. What I am lacking is quantity, not quality. Quality is oppression; quantity is liberation.”*
So that’s why.