You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-14
IGOexiled on scored.co
5 days ago-14 points(+0/-0/-14Score on mirror)10 children
It's equally as immoral for her to have made the choice not to provide vaccine to patients who were expecting it. I will not allow the ends to justify the means, here.
What we see is yet more evidence that the medical system is not able to reliably distribute medicine with informed consent. The contents of the vials are hidden from the very patients whose responsibility it is to make the decision.
This is the mirror image of corruption, noitpurroc. Just as disgusting, only a bit less readably so.
5 days ago-13 points(+0/-0/-13Score on mirror)3 children
Yes, until you find out your grandma died because they swapped her chemo treatment for saline without telling you. If it's ever allowable, it will be exploited. /npc
5 days ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)1 child
While I agree in the abstract, what we're seeing here is the foundations for a reverse Nuremberg defence being lain for those who willingly took part in giving out vaccines which hadn't gone through the proper quality assurance processes, even though their academic training told them not to do such things.
This will get a whole bunch of people from the medical establishment, the legal framework and the political hierarchy off on any potential ramifications from indulging in malpractice.
One nurse doing what they thought was the correct course of action based on their training versus everyone doing what they knew was wrong despite their training.
5 days ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
You're burying the lede here. What you're saying is valid in the case of a proven therapeutic medicine, but completely *invalid* in the case of an untested DNA altering bioweapon that people were massively propagandized into desiring.
The key here is that for what you're saying to make sense, the person requesting the "medicine" (which the DNA altering poison shot isn't) has to be able to give informed consent, which isn't true of anyone who actually desired to take it since all information on its actual effects was hidden.
There are more than one problem. Hiding the data is one. Pressuring the public through their employers to take the shot is another.
Neglecting to mention that they cannot mass produce error-free mRNA such that every dose is uniquely risky is a third, which I have never heard mentioned.
This woman should never lie about the treatment she administers. The eye doctor will tell you they are using a "light" instead of the "puff" but they actually are pressing a crystal against your eyeball to measure the give. It's widespread dishonesty.
The woman would not be giving shots, vaccine nor saline, had all the other ethical breaches been addressed.
>The key here is that for what you're saying to make sense, the person requesting the "medicine" (which the DNA altering poison shot isn't) has to be able to give informed consent, which isn't true of anyone who actually desired to take it since all information on its actual effects was hidden.
And because there was no consent in the first place, it was forced. If I held a gun to your head and told you to suck me off does than mean you willingly blew a man? no because you'd have been killed otherwise, there was no choice. Same thing with threat of unemployment for not being vaxed.
>It's equally as immoral for her to have made the choice not to provide vaccine to patients who were expecting it.
So If you're forced to have something injected into you against your will it's immoral for someone to not do so because you were expected to be injected with the untested substance instead? The Covid vaxs were forced under penalty of death via unemployment.
>The contents of the vials are hidden from the very patients whose responsibility it is to make the decision.
There is no decision, either you took it or you lost your job, and ended up homeless and unable to buy food.
I'm past the point of arguing with jews online, I'm now at the point of simply summarily executing them when the time comes. When is that? Who knows. Hopefully soon.
What we see is yet more evidence that the medical system is not able to reliably distribute medicine with informed consent. The contents of the vials are hidden from the very patients whose responsibility it is to make the decision.
This is the mirror image of corruption, noitpurroc. Just as disgusting, only a bit less readably so.
You couldn’t have picked a worse example lmao
If I was served a potentially hazardous coke but she switches it with a non hazardous coke.
I'd be ok with her dishonesty...
Your welcome.
MODS THERE IS A KIKE ON THE LOOSE HERE
This will get a whole bunch of people from the medical establishment, the legal framework and the political hierarchy off on any potential ramifications from indulging in malpractice.
One nurse doing what they thought was the correct course of action based on their training versus everyone doing what they knew was wrong despite their training.
Outcomes of said injection be damned!
Healthcare isn't about following orders.
Soldiers follow orders and it's never in their best interests.
The key here is that for what you're saying to make sense, the person requesting the "medicine" (which the DNA altering poison shot isn't) has to be able to give informed consent, which isn't true of anyone who actually desired to take it since all information on its actual effects was hidden.
There are more than one problem. Hiding the data is one. Pressuring the public through their employers to take the shot is another.
Neglecting to mention that they cannot mass produce error-free mRNA such that every dose is uniquely risky is a third, which I have never heard mentioned.
This woman should never lie about the treatment she administers. The eye doctor will tell you they are using a "light" instead of the "puff" but they actually are pressing a crystal against your eyeball to measure the give. It's widespread dishonesty.
The woman would not be giving shots, vaccine nor saline, had all the other ethical breaches been addressed.
And because there was no consent in the first place, it was forced. If I held a gun to your head and told you to suck me off does than mean you willingly blew a man? no because you'd have been killed otherwise, there was no choice. Same thing with threat of unemployment for not being vaxed.
So If you're forced to have something injected into you against your will it's immoral for someone to not do so because you were expected to be injected with the untested substance instead? The Covid vaxs were forced under penalty of death via unemployment.
>The contents of the vials are hidden from the very patients whose responsibility it is to make the decision.
There is no decision, either you took it or you lost your job, and ended up homeless and unable to buy food.
You also want kids to want to chop off their balls and penis without anyone preventing it. Do you know how I know that?