Consume Product

The Templar myth came from the Freemasons themselves, which is why I dont buy it. Most of their "mythology" is glorified schizopost, and the real likelihood is that they originated as a branch of Kabala (Antinomian Gnosticism with a jewish skinsuit, as everyone here probably knows) for the goy. The french king got into a spat with the original Templars because they owned a bunch of land he wanted and tortured them into giving false confessions about worshipping demons, which they later recanted before the Inquisition. But the damage by all the sham trials was done (and the king also had a lot of sway over the Pope), so the Templars were disbanded and their assets were seized. DeMolay himself, who the Masons view as some sort of Masonic pioneer who resisted Monarchy (he didnt, he was just falsely accused by a corrupt King) and the Church (which is even more laughable, because he not only fully recanted his false confession before the inquisition, but also begged to have a Catholic burial), seems to have nothing to do with jewery or masonry (which didnt pop up until the 16th century, its unlikely it existed in the 13th century when the Templar were dissolved). Its possible there were a few heretics in the ranks of the Templar, but the Inquisition would have caught them before the king if they were guilty of any of the crimes he accused them of. The modern "Templars" are basically a freemasonic skinsuit of the original order and have no real ties to it, being completely opposed to it in both function and purpose.

Well my pajeet mongrel friend, supposedly the order was "resurrected" in the 17th century as some sort of banking cartel. It was probably jewed hard since it was so related to Canaan.

Maybe something related to Raymond of Tripoli.

Bill Cooper did a Mystery Babylon episode that covers this.

Protocols of zion references masonic lodges as a front