Consume Product - Arete Network

22

GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co

1 year ago 22 points (+0 / -0 / )

Kikes literally killed the bloke, its no wonder why the phrase "Christ is King" is like saying TKD to their ears

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

19

x79q3pb on scored.co

1 year ago 19 points (+0 / -1 / ) 3 children

It's also why the Jews were so (((helpful))) in creating the English translation of the bible. What did they leave out, I wonder.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

14

TakenusernameA on scored.co

1 year ago 14 points (+0 / -1 / )

Its also why (((theyve))) been so eager to 'discredit' the Vulgate and have made sure since Vatican II that the Church has been permitting non-Vulgate "translations" based on the (((Masoretic Text))), despite the fact that the Vulgate is *still* the official Church Translation.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

9

BeefyBelisarius on scored.co

1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / )

We still have the old Greek Textus Receptus New Testament and Septagaunt Old Testament, along with translations from them.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

1

Kaizen on scored.co

1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

Is there a reliable post somewhere that gives me a zoomed out view of this development, from the origins of the bible, and to how we have the jew’ed poisoned version today? Cheers.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

2

x79q3pb on scored.co

1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / )

I didn't save the sources when I was looking into it, but to repeat my steps, hop onto Brave AI (Leo) and ask about which Jewish groups were involved in the creation of the English version of the bible and ask it to cite it's sources, then dig into those. It's usually pretty forthcoming.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

11

TakenusernameA on scored.co

1 year ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

Also the parable of the wicked husbandmen, which is an allegory for the ancient Hebrews killing the Prophets and Christ, and then being destroyed by the Romans themselves in retribution, and the Church and the Holy Land being handed of to the faithful remnant and the Gentiles. Even if the synagogue of Satan *were* actual Hebrews (which they arent, unless your an extreme one drop rule believer, in which case most meds and whites and jeets would probably be Hebrews), they *still* would have no claim to the Holy Land and wouldnt be "The People of God".

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

9

ApexVeritas on scored.co

1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / ) 2 children

It's one thing that's been quite surprising to me when reading the New Testament. Most of what Jesus said, and about half of the parables Jesus taught, were explicitly condemning the Pharisees, scribes, Sadducees, and jews of His day. There is zero chance that if you read the Bible, you come away thinking jews are God's chosen people, that dispensationalism and judeo-Christianity are true, that Jesus has two brides, or that the new covenant/Israel doesn't now entirely rest in the Christian church.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

6

TakenusernameA on scored.co

1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / )

Yes, which makes me laugh at any dispensationalist prot who claims "catholics arent allowed to read the bible". One would literally have to *not read the bible* to believe half the crap they do. Now of course, sadly most (self-proclaimed) Catholics *dont* read their bibles, because *if they did*, Modernism would die off overnight. Honestly, daily readings are not enough, because the modernists have been curating those to be within the "acceptable" verses so that a mass of enraged Catholic peasants doesnt rise up and literally defrock them and cast them to the vultures for betraying Christ.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

1

Byzantine_Shill on scored.co

1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / )

Sola scriptura is a low hanging fruit because their arguments are destroyed by simply quoting the Bible.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

9

Hullohoomans on scored.co

1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / ) 2 children

It's interesting that the older translations also imply the king expected his wicked servant to put the money in a bank to gain usury. Not interest. Explicitly usury.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

8

TakenusernameA on scored.co

1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

interest and usury were viewed as the same thing, because you werent doing actual work to gain interest from the bank.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

6

Hullohoomans on scored.co

1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / ) 2 children

Yes, I say that's interesting because modern jews in the church like to portray them as separate things.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

8

BlippiIsAPedo on scored.co

1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / )

Them: “Well technically blah blah blah interest and usury is the same except usury is excessive interest blah blah blah”

Me: “No. That is the modern bank definition. That is not the historical definition.”

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

4

TakenusernameA on scored.co

1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / )

Yeah, I think traitorous monarchs in the middle ages used the same excuse which led to jews getting ahold of the banking system in the first place.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

4

ApexVeritas on scored.co

1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / )

Jesus always taught in parables, in metaphors easily understood by the audience he was speaking to. That specific parable is about the talents and blessings God gives us, to spread and share them, and not bury them in the ground, as the bad servant did. Jesus knew who he was talking to, when he compared it to usury and banking.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

6

LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co