>There has never been a "libleft/libright" government or country. Not once. It is a fairy tale.
Well yeah, that's why lolbertarianism is a fucking joke. The *people* are libright. Their ideology is fantastically fucking gay and would genuinely make the most retardedly dysfunctional dipshit society in the world.
Ayn Rand attempted to describe such a society and it relied on not asking who grew the food and everything was powered by a perpetual energy machine.
TBH a dichotomy is the disjoint separation between two subclasses, a duality while the political compass graph mixes two dimensions thus creating four distinct areas or classes.
The first time I've seen such a graphical representation of societal divides was on the economist [Carlo Cipolla](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlo_M._Cipolla) essay [The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity](https://ia601609.us.archive.org/29/items/kaufman-s-clinical-neurology-for-psychiatrists-pdfdrive/The%20Basic%20Laws%20of%20Human%20Stupidity%20(Carlo%20M.%20Cipolla)%20(Z-Library).pdf) quite a few years back.
Regarding the real false dichotomy you proposed when mentioning the authright which I think you meant alright as with is short for authentic an attribute they don't have.
The political spectrum has been steadily reduced from the nineties to the point today we don't have a real rightwing. Again drawing an example from math, imagine the political spectrum as a line going from -1 to 1 where 1 is right and -1 is left. The right moved all its positions near 0 while the left went near -1. The people were slow boiled like frogs to become liberals while their conservative views were shamed as being extreme right or nazi for the sake of hyperbolic discourse.
The question is: how do we solve that problem? I think the current proposal is quite effective, push pinkos as far as they can go to the left so people see how crazy they are. Sort of what they did to us in the last four decades, but cranked up to 11.
Once we do that, how do we stay there? People nowadays are almost completely unethical because they have no morals. Ethics comes from human reasoning while morals come from natural law. To fix their ethics we first need to fix their morals, and that only God can do as He is the one who set on stone the natural law.
>There has never been a "libleft/libright" government or country. Not once. It is a fairy tale.
i would argue that there is no such thing as lib-left or lib-right because as the size of the government shrinks to zero it has no power to enact left or right policies. The 4 square quadrant should really be an inverted triangle.
The vast majority of governments in history and also nowadays are "authright".
Despite that fact, people think "authright" is when le ebil 4chan troll, or when ebil nassi.
There has never been a "libleft/libright" government or country. Not once. It is a fairy tale.
"Authleft" is mostly dead since 1991.
With all that in mind, these "memes" are nonsensical propaganda.
I HATE THE POLITICAL COMPASS. DOWN WITH THE ARISTOCRAT LIZARD MINDCONTROL!!!!!
"Authright" does not mean Christian or traditional. I am not sure why so many people think that it does.
Well yeah, that's why lolbertarianism is a fucking joke. The *people* are libright. Their ideology is fantastically fucking gay and would genuinely make the most retardedly dysfunctional dipshit society in the world.
Ayn Rand attempted to describe such a society and it relied on not asking who grew the food and everything was powered by a perpetual energy machine.
The first time I've seen such a graphical representation of societal divides was on the economist [Carlo Cipolla](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlo_M._Cipolla) essay [The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity](https://ia601609.us.archive.org/29/items/kaufman-s-clinical-neurology-for-psychiatrists-pdfdrive/The%20Basic%20Laws%20of%20Human%20Stupidity%20(Carlo%20M.%20Cipolla)%20(Z-Library).pdf) quite a few years back.
Regarding the real false dichotomy you proposed when mentioning the authright which I think you meant alright as with is short for authentic an attribute they don't have.
The political spectrum has been steadily reduced from the nineties to the point today we don't have a real rightwing. Again drawing an example from math, imagine the political spectrum as a line going from -1 to 1 where 1 is right and -1 is left. The right moved all its positions near 0 while the left went near -1. The people were slow boiled like frogs to become liberals while their conservative views were shamed as being extreme right or nazi for the sake of hyperbolic discourse.
The question is: how do we solve that problem? I think the current proposal is quite effective, push pinkos as far as they can go to the left so people see how crazy they are. Sort of what they did to us in the last four decades, but cranked up to 11.
Once we do that, how do we stay there? People nowadays are almost completely unethical because they have no morals. Ethics comes from human reasoning while morals come from natural law. To fix their ethics we first need to fix their morals, and that only God can do as He is the one who set on stone the natural law.
i would argue that there is no such thing as lib-left or lib-right because as the size of the government shrinks to zero it has no power to enact left or right policies. The 4 square quadrant should really be an inverted triangle.