1 year ago10 points(+0/-0/+10Score on mirror)2 children
Jesus is the anti-Jew: sent to fulfill and end the legitimacy of the Old Covenant of Judaism and replace it with Christianity.
Jesus was sent to stamp out the legitimacy of Mosaic Law and convert as many Jews as possible to Christianity while sweeping the remaining Jewish garbage into the dustbin of hell.
One of Jesus' greatest sacrifices was being born into the filth of the viper's den.
Jews: a people so intolerably disgusting that even God was forced to intervene to tell them to, "cut that shit out".
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
Yes and no: although modern Ashkenazi jews effectively share no bloodline with the biblical jews, their culture, behavior and beliefs are the same, shaped by the same jewish scholars who wrote the Talmud.
And guess which ancient sect those scholars came from? After persecution drove the early Christians away from Jerusalem, Rome became the instrument of punishment for the sects that rejected the Messiah. Pharasee leaders escaped to Babylon while the leadership of the other sects was being destroyed in a failed revolt.
1 year ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)2 children
Judaism did not exist until 400 years after the death of Jesus. The Pharisees practiced the religion known as "the tradition of the elders", which was the Canaanite religion practiced in Babylon. So, what are you actually on about?
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
I'd say "fulfill" rather than "stamp out the legitimacy of" the Mosaic Law. But essentially I agree with you.
The Law wasn't bad, but it can't save you, only show you that you need to be saved. Christ alone could be the perfect sacrifice and High Priest needed for reconciliation with God. Christ certainly had no kind words for the man-made traditions of the jewish teachers (what became codified as the Talmud).
Fulfill means to end within the context of Matthew 5:17-18.
>The Law wasn't bad
As a Red Letter Christian, I disagree.
The Jewish Mosaic Laws of the Old Covenant were flawed because they invited loopholes because of their limited context, something the entire life and teachings of Jesus Christ solved.
I suspect kikes wrote those laws and the Old Covenant only represented shekelniggers following their own myths which were based partially on truth.
For example, kikes twisted each of the Ten Commandments to represent the opposite of their true meanings within their Satanic Talmud.
Yids perverted every prohibited act of their laws into something acceptable proving they swing a chicken over their heads and beat it to death on the ground (kapparot). This is just one example.
I similarly don't believe God is obsessed with foreskins, but it is the jew who is and they falsely project that nonsense upon God.
The only people who couldn't follow 10 commands had to invent over 600 to make sure they didn't break the original 10.
All they had to do was not commit adultery...
>But what about if she's not an adult yet, like what's the minimum age she can be before it's considered adultery? Not a day younger than 3 years, sounds right.
These people are not going to be saved with or without a messiah because they can't even comprehend the law.
Exactly. Imagine thinking you can trick God. "Haughty" doesn't even begin to describe it. There truly will be wailing and gnashing of the teeth when they find that God cannot be tricked.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
And they really hate it when you point out the fact that modern rabbinic judaism is descended from the pharasees, who wrote the talmud after fleeing to Babylon. Conflating Christ with the guys He was constantly at odds with in the Gospels is tremendously disingenuous.
This was a big red pill for me when I really started to open my eyes and question. Jesus lauded the Law and the Prophets, but he constantly railed against he scribes and Pharisees. I had to ask myself: What were they teaching that was different from Scripture? You're absolutely right, it was what became the written Talmud.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Jesus was a jew.
He tried to convince the other kikes to be less evil.
They killed him for it, hence why they hate him to this day.
Jesus was literally called the king of the jews and was in judea and yet people on here cope and say he was not jewish becuse "wall of text".
Admittedly, jews now are mutts, and talmundism was invented after they killed Jesus, so I guess Jesus would be somewhst different from the jews today, but still, the holy text literally calls him a jew.
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)2 children
> believes what jews say about Christ
Yeah and a nigger is a Texan and Englishman /s. The info is out there, all you gotta do is look for it https://christogenea.org/podcasts/society/exactly-why-jesus-christ-not-jew
They've taught you a few wrongs like they did mostly everyone since the Vatican II. But don't worry as there are trustworthy sources.
> Mat 27:24-25 CPDV “Then Pilate, seeing that he was able to accomplish nothing, but that a greater tumult was occurring, taking water, washed his hands in the sight of the people, saying: “I am innocent of the blood of this just man. See to it yourselves.” 25. And the entire people responded by saying, “May his blood be upon us and upon our children.””
The scene where Pilate washes his hands proves (((who))) actually orchestrated his death at the hands of the Romans, but I fail to see how it proves that the jews were not killing one of their own.
Jesus was sent to stamp out the legitimacy of Mosaic Law and convert as many Jews as possible to Christianity while sweeping the remaining Jewish garbage into the dustbin of hell.
One of Jesus' greatest sacrifices was being born into the filth of the viper's den.
Jews: a people so intolerably disgusting that even God was forced to intervene to tell them to, "cut that shit out".
https://www.foxnews.com/us/jews-talmud-anti-semitic-attacks-meadowlands
Christianity is basically a less evil form of judaism that was meant to replace judiasm.
The Law wasn't bad, but it can't save you, only show you that you need to be saved. Christ alone could be the perfect sacrifice and High Priest needed for reconciliation with God. Christ certainly had no kind words for the man-made traditions of the jewish teachers (what became codified as the Talmud).
>The Law wasn't bad
As a Red Letter Christian, I disagree.
The Jewish Mosaic Laws of the Old Covenant were flawed because they invited loopholes because of their limited context, something the entire life and teachings of Jesus Christ solved.
I suspect kikes wrote those laws and the Old Covenant only represented shekelniggers following their own myths which were based partially on truth.
For example, kikes twisted each of the Ten Commandments to represent the opposite of their true meanings within their Satanic Talmud.
Yids perverted every prohibited act of their laws into something acceptable proving they swing a chicken over their heads and beat it to death on the ground (kapparot). This is just one example.
I similarly don't believe God is obsessed with foreskins, but it is the jew who is and they falsely project that nonsense upon God.
The only people who couldn't follow 10 commands had to invent over 600 to make sure they didn't break the original 10.
All they had to do was not commit adultery...
>But what about if she's not an adult yet, like what's the minimum age she can be before it's considered adultery? Not a day younger than 3 years, sounds right.
These people are not going to be saved with or without a messiah because they can't even comprehend the law.
u/#tyrone
>basically