Consume Product

This is good reason tbf. I thought that was odd back in school but as a kid didnt question it. But later on seeing his actual artwork compared to what was accepted shows that there was clearly a bias against him.

We were taught a lie, but there is some truth to be found within it. This shows a clear jewish domimance of the academy in vienna and the artwork is therefore exclusively ugly.

Thjey often make "anti-art" for the purpose of being ugly and demoralizing.

Anyone who's seen the art in question knows that all the Führer did was to notice the (((corruption))). Something everyone in Germany as well as most of Europe had also noticed. Because it was worldwide, not just art but little things everywhere which all adds up.

They basically said it was for no reason at all and he blamed the jews for the treaty of Versailles (also for no reason at all, because they didnt cover the Spartacist Revolution or anything about how degenerate Weimar was, in fact they claimed it was the Nazis doing the troon surgeries in the camps.) The American Edjewcation system is an abomination.

kikes abhor beauty and adore ugliness

What's weird is how you can see the psy-op function in real time whenever you bring this up. Kike simps will pretend Hitler's art is far worse than it actually is, blubbering on about "muh scale" and "muh perspective".

Yes, no-one's denying Hitler's scale and perspective were off. It's almost as if he was a student looking to improve his skills in art, which gee, I don't know, an ART SCHOOL IS FOR?

He was an amazing artist in my opinion

such vile degeneracy the jewish """"art"""" exhibits

you almost think it was made by some primitive negro tribe...

Yeah, I was taught this bullshit as well. There's a reason they never show you his paintings, because in the mind of any reasonable person, this would immediately create doubt about his supposed lack of talent, and lead to many uncomfortable questions about the academy instead (it was all run by Jews).

Ah, so this is why hitler shamed degenerate artwork when he rose to power.

also to all the retards who claim he couldn't paint people, which i see as a common cope when this obvious injustice is called out, https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1994fbYiBy/hitler-couldnt-paint-people-bro-/c

are you talking about eduard bloch?

Eh... he seems more like an architect to me.

After all, he did build a functioning, happy society in record time.

Anyone who believes that clearly has not read Hitler's own account of that in "Mein Kampf". He described his early days in Vienna as a hopeful art student and his encounters with jews. He noticed how the jews acted, but didn't see the pattern at first. He describes how his attitude toward them changed as he became aware of how truly sociopathic they are.

I think he would have become the man he was even if he did get into art school because he created beauty and order, and the school was filled with jews who could only create ugliness and chaos. He served in the war and never forgot the feeling of betrayal Germany felt when jews surrendered the German nation, made the country admit guilt for the war, and implemented crushing war reparations. He was also quite clear about that too in "Mein Kampf".