1 month ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
Ah yes, sorry. It's not *Christianity*, I misspoke. It's the *Catholic Church* that acts completely independently for the Christian ideology because it has no idea how to interpret the scriptures after 2000 years.
I support anything that mends the Great Schism. If it means the destruction of a ton of human institutions, so be it. Anything that unites Christendom against its true ✡enemy✡ is good for us.
Abusing foreigners (which is what the human trafficking atrocity that is illegal immigration and fake refugees being imported to be exploited for cheap labor actually is) is literally a sin crying out to heaven for vengeance according to the Catholic Church. Its astounding we have a whole congregation of Bishops who are completely ignorant of their own faith, or worse, know it but are compromising it because they are afraid of being called mean names or simply greedy. I think what we have just witnessed is a bunch of Bishops *excommunicating themselves*.
The funny thing is that the Catholic Church, at least in the US, doesnt actually tithe, and if they did to support this treason against both Church and Country, the USCCB would rapidly find itself bankrupt and dealing with a Schism (or more accurately, exposing themselves as being in Schism), something they are too cowardly to do. I expect them to continue to complain but to ultimately surrender to Traditionalists, who tend to be Nationalist, because they are utterly spineless.
When they stop fucking boys, they can have their money back.
When the shit for brains, one lunged pedophile dying pope stops injecting himself into every left wing issue maybe I will give a fuck.
Your Pope supports abortion. Is he really a Pope, and since you follow him, are you really Catholics, Mr. Bishops? All males by the way, so progressive, in some ways but not in others.
The Catholic church, home of 2000 years of graft, extortion, conquest, blood and pedophilia loves lecturing others on morality.
This rant is from a born Catholic by the way.
I do not need man to worship God. I have his book.
Before getting into this. I want to point out the distinction between the Church and the Vatican II, which Saint Paul warned was a revolt against the Church and that its leader would call himself God in a church. This is important for understanding the difference because if the Church was always a false church, its’ buildings would not be considered a Temple of God. 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4:
> 3 Let no man deceive you by any means, for unless **there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed,** the son of perdition, 4 Who opposeth, and is lifted up above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that **he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God.**
The Vatican II summed in one sentence as a new religion where man is God by Antipope John Paul II:
> [In those same words is **the new truth,** indeed, the ultimate and **definitive truth about man:** the Son of the living God – **‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”**](https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/homilies/1978/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_19781022_inizio-pontificato.html)
With the understanding of VII’s nature, it is interesting that the Bible references kings sharing riches with the Vatican II and now the Vatican II is being exposed as taking millions, if not trillions, PER YEAR from Earthly kings. Now people are beginning to truly hate the Vatican II as frauds either spiritually or for monetary fraud. Revelation 17:3-5;16-18:
> And he took me away in spirit into the desert. And I saw a woman sitting upon a scarlet coloured beast, **full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.** 4 And the woman was clothed round about with purple and scarlet, and gilt with gold, and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand, full of the abomination and filthiness of her fornication. 5 And on **her forehead a name was written: A mystery; Babylon the great, the mother of the fornications,** and the abominations of the earth.
> And the ten horns which thou sawest in the beast: **these shall hate the harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked,** and shall eat her flesh, and shall burn her with fire. 17 For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that **they give their kingdom to the beast,** till the words of God be fulfilled. 18 And the woman which thou sawest, **is the great city, which hath kingdom over the kings of the earth.**
Again in Revelations 18:8-9
> Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine, and **she shall be burnt with the fire;** because God is strong, who shall judge her. 9 And the **kings of the earth, who have committed fornication, and lived in delicacies with her,** shall weep, and bewail themselves over her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning. (Revelations 18:8-9)
For those curious, the beast has two meanings depending on context. Its either addressed specifically to the European Union alone or to both the Vatican II and EU as one entity whereas the VII is the spiritual and the EU is the physical. Both of these combined brought back pagan Rome and the Roman Empire hence why it’s referred to as the” beast that was and is not”. It was like the pagan Roman Empire but it is not the Roman Empire. This is important for the next part:
> And the beast **which was, and is not:** the same also is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into destruction. 12 And the ten horns which thou sawest, are ten kings, **who have not yet received a kingdom, but shall receive power as kings one hour after the beast.** 13 These have one design: and **their strength and power they shall deliver to the beast.**
The eighth and seven is referencing to the seven leaders of the physical kingdom of the Vatican city-state that elects a priest-king as head of state. In order to be the king, you must be a validly ordained priest. Pope Pius XII and the six antipopes that followed were valid priests and thus eligible to rule the city-state but Francis was not validly ordained in the Traditional Rites. Thus he is not a priest and not eligible to be head of state hence why he is called the eighth and separated from the seven.
I think the Beast and Harlot referred in Revelations to might be more accurately applied to Communism/Zionism and the British Empire, which was essentially tossed to the wolves of the USSR and USA (which are both ultimately flagbearers for the Antichrist fake jews), though some interpret it as the Roman Empire continued in the HRE, which was ended around WWI with the destruction of Prussian Empire. Of course, the traditiona interpretation was that it was the Roman Empire under Nero, who was "reborn" in the policies of Julian the Apostate (who coincidentally was also a Zionist who tried to rebuild the temple) who tried and failed to re-paganize Rome.