You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 month ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Well put. There's a not insignificant amount to appreciate about it, both in its teachings and in aspects of history. Individual Christians can be quite based.
Christianity itself, though? It's subversive at it's core. I'm sorry, it just is.
I was just in church today, one of the most conservative and liturgical ones you can find. The pastor's sermon was on Jesus's sermon on the plain, and that it's a hard teaching, because it means what it says. When it says you have to love your enemy, it means you have to love your enemy. When it says you must give to those who ask of you, you have to give to them. Yes, including that panhandler on the corner (and the hordes of nonwhite immigrants, I'm sure.) When it says judge not? Judge not.
From inside the dusty old hymnal—which is a longstanding part of this conservative church's tradition—we sang a song which included this little number:
"Lord of all nations, grant me grace
to love all people, every race;
and in each person may I see
my kindred, loved, redeemed by thee,"
It's always been pozzed. When people who practice it are based, it is because their human nature is rebelling against Christianity's teachings, not acting in accordance with them.
Shining a light on this cognitive dissonance always triggers white hot rage in those who are called out by it, but I'm not going to stop doing it.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
> It's always been pozzed. When people who practice it are based, it is because their human nature is rebelling against Christianity's teachings, not acting in accordance with them.
High IQ. They are based *in spite* of christianity, **NOT** because of it. and oh man, that fucking song is just sad & pathetic.
[I know this video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT2jyy97wns) is long (1:28), but I’d really like you to listen to it and let me know what you think, when you have time. I’m curious whose side you’re on in this discussion. Honestly, I ended up finding the satanists way more grounded and sane than the moralizing christian idiot. At 21:55, the Christian brings up Nazi Germany for the first time of many, so you can start there.
I'm at 15 minutes, but I can tell you right off the bat that I'd side with Christianity over Satanism, even though the specific Christian in this video appears to be your unimpressive wax sculpture televangelist type.
Christianity has far more redeeming aspects to it than Satanism. Some things about the latter sound good on paper, but it's ultimately spiritual libertarianism. Do As Thou Wilt. Any such philosophy will inevitably descend into societal drudgery. Religion needs to have collective moral accountability to the concept of a Greatest Good (God) among its adherents. There *must* be order, not unchecked individualism.
Christian societies were in solid shape for a long time, even though the seeds that led to their eventual fall were already planted. I imagine a Satanic society would look just like our current one but accelerated to the extreme. Furthermore, jews (as jews do) play both sides of the coin on this issue, as Satanism is even more jewy than Christianity.
Anton LaVey, born (((Howard Stanton Levey,))) is a turbo kike.
Christianity itself, though? It's subversive at it's core. I'm sorry, it just is.
I was just in church today, one of the most conservative and liturgical ones you can find. The pastor's sermon was on Jesus's sermon on the plain, and that it's a hard teaching, because it means what it says. When it says you have to love your enemy, it means you have to love your enemy. When it says you must give to those who ask of you, you have to give to them. Yes, including that panhandler on the corner (and the hordes of nonwhite immigrants, I'm sure.) When it says judge not? Judge not.
From inside the dusty old hymnal—which is a longstanding part of this conservative church's tradition—we sang a song which included this little number:
"Lord of all nations, grant me grace
to love all people, every race;
and in each person may I see
my kindred, loved, redeemed by thee,"
It's always been pozzed. When people who practice it are based, it is because their human nature is rebelling against Christianity's teachings, not acting in accordance with them.
Shining a light on this cognitive dissonance always triggers white hot rage in those who are called out by it, but I'm not going to stop doing it.
High IQ. They are based *in spite* of christianity, **NOT** because of it. and oh man, that fucking song is just sad & pathetic.
[I know this video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT2jyy97wns) is long (1:28), but I’d really like you to listen to it and let me know what you think, when you have time. I’m curious whose side you’re on in this discussion. Honestly, I ended up finding the satanists way more grounded and sane than the moralizing christian idiot. At 21:55, the Christian brings up Nazi Germany for the first time of many, so you can start there.
Christianity has far more redeeming aspects to it than Satanism. Some things about the latter sound good on paper, but it's ultimately spiritual libertarianism. Do As Thou Wilt. Any such philosophy will inevitably descend into societal drudgery. Religion needs to have collective moral accountability to the concept of a Greatest Good (God) among its adherents. There *must* be order, not unchecked individualism.
Christian societies were in solid shape for a long time, even though the seeds that led to their eventual fall were already planted. I imagine a Satanic society would look just like our current one but accelerated to the extreme. Furthermore, jews (as jews do) play both sides of the coin on this issue, as Satanism is even more jewy than Christianity.
Anton LaVey, born (((Howard Stanton Levey,))) is a turbo kike.