You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
LawrysSeasonedSoap on scored.co
1 month ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
While I agree, I think it is important to point out how the "most evil far-right regime in history" allowed women and minorities to have the same freedoms (to join any profession and pursue their individual passions) as anyone else.
The mainstream worldview around DEI is that it is appropriately named: that the goal of DEI is to promote diversity, equity and inclusion. So therefore when someone criticizes DEI, the mainstream reaction/assumption is that they are against diversity, equity and inclusion. However this is backwards!
Even the most "antisemitic" regime in history allowed diversity and even had black scholarships. They allowed women to do whatever they wanted while still protecting them and encouraging motherhood. All races and cultures were included, EVEN JEWS.
(Some may argue that this was a weakness and that Hitler's compassion / leniency caused his failure and thus the downfall of western civilization. But that is another topic lol)
Compare this obvious display of tolerance and love for others with the current jewish "DEI". DEI is against diversity of thought, race and culture; DEI is against equity as it redistributes wealth unfairly, and it is against inclusion as it specifically excludes certain people (based entirely on race).
By sharing this kind of content, Im trying to make the horseshoe touch and recruit the far-left over to our side.
Get the fuck out of here with this nonsense. Under National Socialism women had a specific role to play, niggers had to just die, and Jews had to fuck off.
I hate how libtards like yourself try to make National Socialism seem like a left wing movement. "All races and cultures were included" are you fucking retarded?
Well, they were. There was a niggerwaffen. There were all races, even jews, in high positions in their government.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Vanguard
The mainstream idea that the Nazis were bigoted is simply a lie. They were nationalists and put Germans first, but if a jew identified as a German they wouldn't get sent to the camps. Thing is, almost all the jews in Germany identified as jews and didnt identify as Germans.
I am indeed trying to appeal to the far-left and make the horsehoe touch. I think showing them how women and minorities were actually treated may shake their programming up.
Animal rights in natsoc Germany is another topic that could appeal to the left. If the truth about kosher was revealed to the world, the left wingers would surely turn.
I appreciate the effort if you're trying to highlight how *humane* the Third Reich was. But it is wrong to pretend that National Socialism is some kind of civic nationalist movement. In fact, the idea of civic nationalism is an abomination concocted by Jewish neocons. The word itself, "nation", implies genetic ancestry.
National Socialism is about the preservation of the White race.
The reason some Jews in Germany also supported it is because they knew that without the NSDAP the Bolsheviks would have conquered the whole of Europe and it would have been much worse for them than living under the Third Reich.
> if a jew identified as a German they wouldn't get sent to the camps
Nobody was sent to camps only because of his race or ethnicity before the war.
The declining birthrates were a core issue, but not the entire focus of national socialism. Their main focus was freeing themselves from economic slavery (which was the cause of the brithrates problem); rooting out the rampant degeneracy and rescuing their people who were being oppressed in Poland.
Yes they wanted to preserve the White race. This is displayed in Hitlers pleas for peace and speeches conveying how he didnt want war in Europe.
But I think you are wrong to say that "National socialism is (ultimately) about preserving the white race" while disregarding the other issues because it misrepresents them to be almost exactly like the hollywood rendition of "white power" Nazis
Whats wrong with me framing them as progressive? They **were**. They were the most loving of the races, which made them the most racist and the least racist simultaneously depending on perspective. They loved animals and were the first to protect them. They loved their women and encouraged motherhood without suppressing their other potentials. They made a government currency and gave out loans. You know all this, but the average normie knows none of it and instead likely thinks the opposite.
They were nationalists, specifically "ethnic nationalists" which is known in newspeak as the opposite of civic nationalists (also newspeak). But they didnt send anyone to the camps based on race.
My point is that there are a lot of ways national socialism is appealing to a progressive / liberal normie if they could be educated; so memes like this one have the potential of being very powerful.
The mainstream worldview around DEI is that it is appropriately named: that the goal of DEI is to promote diversity, equity and inclusion. So therefore when someone criticizes DEI, the mainstream reaction/assumption is that they are against diversity, equity and inclusion. However this is backwards!
Even the most "antisemitic" regime in history allowed diversity and even had black scholarships. They allowed women to do whatever they wanted while still protecting them and encouraging motherhood. All races and cultures were included, EVEN JEWS.
(Some may argue that this was a weakness and that Hitler's compassion / leniency caused his failure and thus the downfall of western civilization. But that is another topic lol)
Compare this obvious display of tolerance and love for others with the current jewish "DEI". DEI is against diversity of thought, race and culture; DEI is against equity as it redistributes wealth unfairly, and it is against inclusion as it specifically excludes certain people (based entirely on race).
By sharing this kind of content, Im trying to make the horseshoe touch and recruit the far-left over to our side.
I hate how libtards like yourself try to make National Socialism seem like a left wing movement. "All races and cultures were included" are you fucking retarded?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Vanguard
The mainstream idea that the Nazis were bigoted is simply a lie. They were nationalists and put Germans first, but if a jew identified as a German they wouldn't get sent to the camps. Thing is, almost all the jews in Germany identified as jews and didnt identify as Germans.
I am indeed trying to appeal to the far-left and make the horsehoe touch. I think showing them how women and minorities were actually treated may shake their programming up.
Animal rights in natsoc Germany is another topic that could appeal to the left. If the truth about kosher was revealed to the world, the left wingers would surely turn.
National Socialism is about the preservation of the White race.
The reason some Jews in Germany also supported it is because they knew that without the NSDAP the Bolsheviks would have conquered the whole of Europe and it would have been much worse for them than living under the Third Reich.
> if a jew identified as a German they wouldn't get sent to the camps
Nobody was sent to camps only because of his race or ethnicity before the war.
Yes they wanted to preserve the White race. This is displayed in Hitlers pleas for peace and speeches conveying how he didnt want war in Europe.
But I think you are wrong to say that "National socialism is (ultimately) about preserving the white race" while disregarding the other issues because it misrepresents them to be almost exactly like the hollywood rendition of "white power" Nazis
Whats wrong with me framing them as progressive? They **were**. They were the most loving of the races, which made them the most racist and the least racist simultaneously depending on perspective. They loved animals and were the first to protect them. They loved their women and encouraged motherhood without suppressing their other potentials. They made a government currency and gave out loans. You know all this, but the average normie knows none of it and instead likely thinks the opposite.
They were nationalists, specifically "ethnic nationalists" which is known in newspeak as the opposite of civic nationalists (also newspeak). But they didnt send anyone to the camps based on race.
My point is that there are a lot of ways national socialism is appealing to a progressive / liberal normie if they could be educated; so memes like this one have the potential of being very powerful.
Horeshoe theory.