You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
17
antiretardant on scored.co
1 month ago17 points(+0/-0/+17Score on mirror)3 children
Even if you find a woman whose intelligence can match intelligence of men, she and the rest of society would be better off if she was making a lot of kids.
1 month ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)3 children
This is one of the more insidious cultural poisons we've swallowed; that motherhood isn't valuable.
How many lawyers do we need, per capita? Maybe 1:1000? Same with doctors, engineers, business executives etc. We need even fewer politicians and scientists. Even teachers are something like 1:100.
How many mothers do we need? To replace the population, at least 1:1 and, since only women can be mothers, more like 2:1.
It is incredibly important that women have kids. We can find men to do the rest, or women can work after they're done, but absolutely none of these fields "need" women like motherhood does.
> How many lawyers do we need, per capita? Maybe 1:1000? Same with doctors, engineers, business executives etc. We need even fewer politicians and scientists. Even teachers are something like 1:100.
At best! I love this logic because you pointed out teachers, who are mostly women. The duties women may take on instead of motherbood instead are usually the easiest and least paid ones. Natural order, perhaps, but there are still rare exceptions such as infertility.
Motherhood is unironically the most important job that a woman can have, its insane that I as a man can easily recognize this, but women these days are simply too emotionally stunted to acknowledge they have a duty to fulifill and would rather LARP as men.
Oh yes. Imagine 4 men with that brain or even greater. And the knowledge she could share to other Mothers. Her output of highly intelligent men would be a value so high, youd have to measure it in Gold
How many lawyers do we need, per capita? Maybe 1:1000? Same with doctors, engineers, business executives etc. We need even fewer politicians and scientists. Even teachers are something like 1:100.
How many mothers do we need? To replace the population, at least 1:1 and, since only women can be mothers, more like 2:1.
It is incredibly important that women have kids. We can find men to do the rest, or women can work after they're done, but absolutely none of these fields "need" women like motherhood does.
> How many lawyers do we need, per capita? Maybe 1:1000? Same with doctors, engineers, business executives etc. We need even fewer politicians and scientists. Even teachers are something like 1:100.
At best! I love this logic because you pointed out teachers, who are mostly women. The duties women may take on instead of motherbood instead are usually the easiest and least paid ones. Natural order, perhaps, but there are still rare exceptions such as infertility.
If a girl has a dream to fly, why shouldn't she?