1 day ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)5 children
The tests of physics and mental capacity should be enough to filter out everything from most women to cucked men, who doesn't belong in important positions like fighter jet pilot or fireman.
The main issue with (((DEI))) is that they lower the standards to fill the quotas, resulting in incompetence just because the quotas are more important.
1 day ago15 points(+0/-0/+15Score on mirror)3 children
Even if you find a woman whose intelligence can match intelligence of men, she and the rest of society would be better off if she was making a lot of kids.
1 day ago10 points(+0/-0/+10Score on mirror)3 children
This is one of the more insidious cultural poisons we've swallowed; that motherhood isn't valuable.
How many lawyers do we need, per capita? Maybe 1:1000? Same with doctors, engineers, business executives etc. We need even fewer politicians and scientists. Even teachers are something like 1:100.
How many mothers do we need? To replace the population, at least 1:1 and, since only women can be mothers, more like 2:1.
It is incredibly important that women have kids. We can find men to do the rest, or women can work after they're done, but absolutely none of these fields "need" women like motherhood does.
> How many lawyers do we need, per capita? Maybe 1:1000? Same with doctors, engineers, business executives etc. We need even fewer politicians and scientists. Even teachers are something like 1:100.
At best! I love this logic because you pointed out teachers, who are mostly women. The duties women may take on instead of motherbood instead are usually the easiest and least paid ones. Natural order, perhaps, but there are still rare exceptions such as infertility.
Motherhood is unironically the most important job that a woman can have, its insane that I as a man can easily recognize this, but women these days are simply too emotionally stunted to acknowledge they have a duty to fulifill and would rather LARP as men.
Oh yes. Imagine 4 men with that brain or even greater. And the knowledge she could share to other Mothers. Her output of highly intelligent men would be a value so high, youd have to measure it in Gold
While I agree, I think it is important to point out how the "most evil far-right regime in history" allowed women and minorities to have the same freedoms (to join any profession and pursue their individual passions) as anyone else.
The mainstream worldview around DEI is that it is appropriately named: that the goal of DEI is to promote diversity, equity and inclusion. So therefore when someone criticizes DEI, the mainstream reaction/assumption is that they are against diversity, equity and inclusion. However this is backwards!
Even the most "antisemitic" regime in history allowed diversity and even had black scholarships. They allowed women to do whatever they wanted while still protecting them and encouraging motherhood. All races and cultures were included, EVEN JEWS.
(Some may argue that this was a weakness and that Hitler's compassion / leniency caused his failure and thus the downfall of western civilization. But that is another topic lol)
Compare this obvious display of tolerance and love for others with the current jewish "DEI". DEI is against diversity of thought, race and culture; DEI is against equity as it redistributes wealth unfairly, and it is against inclusion as it specifically excludes certain people (based entirely on race).
By sharing this kind of content, Im trying to make the horseshoe touch and recruit the far-left over to our side.
>Hanna Reitsch was one of the best-known and most successful female aviators in 20th century Germany. ***Reitsch set more than 40 records in all classes and types of aircraft.*** During the National Socialist era, she was active as a sometimes fanatical supporter of the National Socialist regime.
She wasn't just any woman. You are insulting her by comparing her to jewish DEI niggers.
We should ensure that even the fittest women are considered below the bar for military service solely so we can also rid the military of effeminate men as well. Ultimately I think the US army should go back to how it was originally conceiver, to train officers who can serve as militia leaders during peace time and to organize the militias into a cohesive army during war time. A standing army is the enemy of a free people, and I would add a professional police force as well, outside of the major population centers of course.
The main issue with (((DEI))) is that they lower the standards to fill the quotas, resulting in incompetence just because the quotas are more important.
How many lawyers do we need, per capita? Maybe 1:1000? Same with doctors, engineers, business executives etc. We need even fewer politicians and scientists. Even teachers are something like 1:100.
How many mothers do we need? To replace the population, at least 1:1 and, since only women can be mothers, more like 2:1.
It is incredibly important that women have kids. We can find men to do the rest, or women can work after they're done, but absolutely none of these fields "need" women like motherhood does.
> How many lawyers do we need, per capita? Maybe 1:1000? Same with doctors, engineers, business executives etc. We need even fewer politicians and scientists. Even teachers are something like 1:100.
At best! I love this logic because you pointed out teachers, who are mostly women. The duties women may take on instead of motherbood instead are usually the easiest and least paid ones. Natural order, perhaps, but there are still rare exceptions such as infertility.
If a girl has a dream to fly, why shouldn't she?
The mainstream worldview around DEI is that it is appropriately named: that the goal of DEI is to promote diversity, equity and inclusion. So therefore when someone criticizes DEI, the mainstream reaction/assumption is that they are against diversity, equity and inclusion. However this is backwards!
Even the most "antisemitic" regime in history allowed diversity and even had black scholarships. They allowed women to do whatever they wanted while still protecting them and encouraging motherhood. All races and cultures were included, EVEN JEWS.
(Some may argue that this was a weakness and that Hitler's compassion / leniency caused his failure and thus the downfall of western civilization. But that is another topic lol)
Compare this obvious display of tolerance and love for others with the current jewish "DEI". DEI is against diversity of thought, race and culture; DEI is against equity as it redistributes wealth unfairly, and it is against inclusion as it specifically excludes certain people (based entirely on race).
By sharing this kind of content, Im trying to make the horseshoe touch and recruit the far-left over to our side.
She wasn't just any woman. You are insulting her by comparing her to jewish DEI niggers.