1 day ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)5 children
The tests of physics and mental capacity should be enough to filter out everything from most women to cucked men, who doesn't belong in important positions like fighter jet pilot or fireman.
The main issue with (((DEI))) is that they lower the standards to fill the quotas, resulting in incompetence just because the quotas are more important.
1 day ago15 points(+0/-0/+15Score on mirror)3 children
Even if you find a woman whose intelligence can match intelligence of men, she and the rest of society would be better off if she was making a lot of kids.
1 day ago10 points(+0/-0/+10Score on mirror)3 children
This is one of the more insidious cultural poisons we've swallowed; that motherhood isn't valuable.
How many lawyers do we need, per capita? Maybe 1:1000? Same with doctors, engineers, business executives etc. We need even fewer politicians and scientists. Even teachers are something like 1:100.
How many mothers do we need? To replace the population, at least 1:1 and, since only women can be mothers, more like 2:1.
It is incredibly important that women have kids. We can find men to do the rest, or women can work after they're done, but absolutely none of these fields "need" women like motherhood does.
> How many lawyers do we need, per capita? Maybe 1:1000? Same with doctors, engineers, business executives etc. We need even fewer politicians and scientists. Even teachers are something like 1:100.
At best! I love this logic because you pointed out teachers, who are mostly women. The duties women may take on instead of motherbood instead are usually the easiest and least paid ones. Natural order, perhaps, but there are still rare exceptions such as infertility.
Motherhood is unironically the most important job that a woman can have, its insane that I as a man can easily recognize this, but women these days are simply too emotionally stunted to acknowledge they have a duty to fulifill and would rather LARP as men.
Oh yes. Imagine 4 men with that brain or even greater. And the knowledge she could share to other Mothers. Her output of highly intelligent men would be a value so high, youd have to measure it in Gold
While I agree, I think it is important to point out how the "most evil far-right regime in history" allowed women and minorities to have the same freedoms (to join any profession and pursue their individual passions) as anyone else.
The mainstream worldview around DEI is that it is appropriately named: that the goal of DEI is to promote diversity, equity and inclusion. So therefore when someone criticizes DEI, the mainstream reaction/assumption is that they are against diversity, equity and inclusion. However this is backwards!
Even the most "antisemitic" regime in history allowed diversity and even had black scholarships. They allowed women to do whatever they wanted while still protecting them and encouraging motherhood. All races and cultures were included, EVEN JEWS.
(Some may argue that this was a weakness and that Hitler's compassion / leniency caused his failure and thus the downfall of western civilization. But that is another topic lol)
Compare this obvious display of tolerance and love for others with the current jewish "DEI". DEI is against diversity of thought, race and culture; DEI is against equity as it redistributes wealth unfairly, and it is against inclusion as it specifically excludes certain people (based entirely on race).
By sharing this kind of content, Im trying to make the horseshoe touch and recruit the far-left over to our side.
>Hanna Reitsch was one of the best-known and most successful female aviators in 20th century Germany. ***Reitsch set more than 40 records in all classes and types of aircraft.*** During the National Socialist era, she was active as a sometimes fanatical supporter of the National Socialist regime.
She wasn't just any woman. You are insulting her by comparing her to jewish DEI niggers.
We should ensure that even the fittest women are considered below the bar for military service solely so we can also rid the military of effeminate men as well. Ultimately I think the US army should go back to how it was originally conceiver, to train officers who can serve as militia leaders during peace time and to organize the militias into a cohesive army during war time. A standing army is the enemy of a free people, and I would add a professional police force as well, outside of the major population centers of course.
1 day ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)3 children
Ok but.
Clean shaved men look like pussies. Santa like beards are also retarded but a beard at 3-7 days looks best.
Fuck listening to orders. Ill listen to orders when the general fights alongside me in battle. Im not going to die while he sits back, enjoys his day and later gets back alive to his family.
If God forbid theres a war, im more likely to shoot someone sending me to die than the enemy
That's why I named myself after Caesar's general from Fallout New Vegas. I'd rather have a Santa beard, but Legate Lanius does have the short beard you speak of.
Personally, I don't care about who I'd fight, only that I fight. A tactical patch sums up my philosophy on that "I don't believe in anything, I'm just here for the violence". I'd see no point in shooting the one sending me to fight
I think she wasnt complaining about men with facial hair, note she said "men *wear* beards", implying the facial hair is fake and they arent real men (and possibly calling them faggots too). I believe historically a beard was basically something you had to earn as part of manhood.
19 hours ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
Back in the Cold War there was an informal rivarly between the Air Force and the Navy. The generals and admirals had nothing better to do so they conceived an ill idea - let's train a female pilot to show the world that American womyn are as capable as men! At the same time the brass didn't want to lower the standards for females for fear of demoralizing the men... (imagine that)
It took years for a woman to pass all the tests, most notably the G-force test. 90% of men can't handle that stuff without blacking out and for a female it was thought impossible. But then - a miracle! After years of training (and fudging some tests I'm sure) the Navy proudly presented - the world's first female Jet Fighter pilot!
The celebration was short lived however. After 3 months Stacy (her real name long forgotten) attempted to land on an aircraft carrier, crashed and burned to death. This entire story was quickly memory holed out of embarassment. The brass continued to admit females to appease the liberals but made damn sure they won't be assigned to combat roles. Or so we thought...
You are who you are because of the struggles you've suffered and the challenges you've overcome.
God gives everyone a chance to repent, yet this mercy is falsely seen as tolerance to evil. Make no mistake, all evildoers are punished **in this world.**
The main issue with (((DEI))) is that they lower the standards to fill the quotas, resulting in incompetence just because the quotas are more important.
How many lawyers do we need, per capita? Maybe 1:1000? Same with doctors, engineers, business executives etc. We need even fewer politicians and scientists. Even teachers are something like 1:100.
How many mothers do we need? To replace the population, at least 1:1 and, since only women can be mothers, more like 2:1.
It is incredibly important that women have kids. We can find men to do the rest, or women can work after they're done, but absolutely none of these fields "need" women like motherhood does.
> How many lawyers do we need, per capita? Maybe 1:1000? Same with doctors, engineers, business executives etc. We need even fewer politicians and scientists. Even teachers are something like 1:100.
At best! I love this logic because you pointed out teachers, who are mostly women. The duties women may take on instead of motherbood instead are usually the easiest and least paid ones. Natural order, perhaps, but there are still rare exceptions such as infertility.
If a girl has a dream to fly, why shouldn't she?
The mainstream worldview around DEI is that it is appropriately named: that the goal of DEI is to promote diversity, equity and inclusion. So therefore when someone criticizes DEI, the mainstream reaction/assumption is that they are against diversity, equity and inclusion. However this is backwards!
Even the most "antisemitic" regime in history allowed diversity and even had black scholarships. They allowed women to do whatever they wanted while still protecting them and encouraging motherhood. All races and cultures were included, EVEN JEWS.
(Some may argue that this was a weakness and that Hitler's compassion / leniency caused his failure and thus the downfall of western civilization. But that is another topic lol)
Compare this obvious display of tolerance and love for others with the current jewish "DEI". DEI is against diversity of thought, race and culture; DEI is against equity as it redistributes wealth unfairly, and it is against inclusion as it specifically excludes certain people (based entirely on race).
By sharing this kind of content, Im trying to make the horseshoe touch and recruit the far-left over to our side.
She wasn't just any woman. You are insulting her by comparing her to jewish DEI niggers.