a consistent argument (Cope) i hear from white people who marry asian women is that
>They're more traditional bro, untainted by muh feminism
But then, what is tradition? what is a traditional relationship? well it is a set of beliefs and behavior patterns, namely the wife being the homemaker/man being the breadwinner, monogamy, marriage of course, and reproducing and having children. But why is this the case? why were these traditions implemented in the first place? Well because they were necessary for survival, polygamous people tended to die off because of either std's or good old violence.
So overall, why is tradition good? because it is a set of behaviors that ensure the continuation of your blood/family/people and ultimately race.
So why the fuck are you worried about your woman behaving in a way that is beneficial to the continuation of your tribe....if she's not of your tribe? What traditions are you worried about? to what end?
These people are trying to fight for something they don't even understand. A blind performative "conservatism" that conserves nothing.
Mmmmm
They're *partly* White, yeah. Also part Moor, who are part Arab, part north African sand nigger. Might have to go on a case by case basis, the more rural the better.
Why do you think Mexicans are so awful? They're the most muddied "Whites"; Muslim *and* Amerindian with vestiges of White morality and work ethic. They mock us by their very existence. Spaniards are little better than Turks, and Mexicans are worse than that.
One can be born in Mexico, or in fucking Nigeria, and be 100% Aryan. Or one can be born in Poland and be a nigger.
Saying that Mexicans are a certain way doesn't make any sense. Some of them are White, some of them are mudblood, some of them are redskins, some of them are niggers.