a consistent argument (Cope) i hear from white people who marry asian women is that
>They're more traditional bro, untainted by muh feminism
But then, what is tradition? what is a traditional relationship? well it is a set of beliefs and behavior patterns, namely the wife being the homemaker/man being the breadwinner, monogamy, marriage of course, and reproducing and having children. But why is this the case? why were these traditions implemented in the first place? Well because they were necessary for survival, polygamous people tended to die off because of either std's or good old violence.
So overall, why is tradition good? because it is a set of behaviors that ensure the continuation of your blood/family/people and ultimately race.
So why the fuck are you worried about your woman behaving in a way that is beneficial to the continuation of your tribe....if she's not of your tribe? What traditions are you worried about? to what end?
These people are trying to fight for something they don't even understand. A blind performative "conservatism" that conserves nothing.
At least they usually tend to be on the beautiful side, unlike nigger breed abominations. So if Asians want more European features like blue eyes and blonde hair, good on them. I would rather have 2 billion of those, than billions of stinky Indians.
And for our women, my take is: As long as she is white and has good genes for healthy children, I give zero fucks about how the woman behaves. She can be a good woman and stick around, or be a bitch and leave.
Of course it would be great to have a normal relationship and you can try to make it work, but healthy white children are the goal, anything good on top is just a bonus. You just need to make sure you don't get (((married))), at least not by state, and that you're not a bum, so you can keep the children.
Do you want your kids to be raised on goyslop or home-cooking? Raised on jew TV and public school or homeschool and parents teaching the kids their craft?
Nurture is equally important as nature, when both are combined our aryan potential is unlocked
This is correct only if you look at the current generations. But if you look at future generations, then nature is 100% and nurture is 0%.
At the end of the 19th century science has debunked the idea that acquired characteristics are passed on. Maintaining the blood pure is the most important thing.
I don't really give a damn about tattoos and piercings either, since they don't affect genes, if she makes up for it with a pretty face. Unvaxxed would be nice, but again, needle in the hay stack...
If they GMO injected her with non-Aryan genes, then your precious white princess is not white anymore.
If your goal was genetically white kids, you've failed. The white race is gone. Mutated away under medical mandate.
It's not my job to save you. The information is out there.
You’re also pretending we live in a sane world where those so called “healthy” children you plan on having are actually your, and under your domain. If the women decides to leave you, and you don’t care as you say, what do you think is going to happen? Do you really think the JEWdicial sistum is really going to let you have those children to raise, if to see at all?
Doesn't seem like an argument to me. Even IF the girl is on some medication, I haven't heard of any that permanently affect the baby. And if you worry about that stuff, you'd have to worry about microplastics and all that shit too. Just raise them as healthy as you can.
>You’re also pretending we live in a sane world
That's why I said "don't be a bum". You have to be ready for this shit. Step 1 is to avoid getting legally married. Make sure you are in the best position possible to argue before court that you're providing and more responsible. If you're not legally married, she also doesn't have the house, or an "income" from your alimony, and if she is tatted with nose rings and crazy, it should be even more convincing that the kids should stay with you.
I know the courts favor muh womenz, but they can't be absolutely blatant. If that all fails, there are still plan C and D which go into "fedposting" territory.
First, women are statistically normal. There aren't many genetic outliers, compared to men, so the insanity is largely caused by upbringing or subversive ideologies. The kids don't necessarily inherit it. All of my exes brothers were total punks; started smoking weed at 11, drinking at 13, run ins with cops and jail, one of them literally stole the cross out of a church. My kids are nothing like that because I raised them right.
>"don't be a bum"
Yes.
When my ex ditched us, I left my job to take care of the kids and ease the transition. You can always make money but you only get a few years to mold your children: don't waste them. I spent the next five years busting my ass between work and raising them, including homeschooling. Don't let anyone tell you that single parents can't support their families while also homeschooling; you can, so long as you aren't a bum. It also helps immensly if you're already a pillar of your local community because people will help you, even if it's just as a good influence on your kids.
As for the courts, I'm in Canada. If you live with someone for six months they have every right a legally married spouse would. It's fucked.
However, I still got full custody. Part of it was luck, a lot of it was planning. As I said, I quit work to stay with the kids, so there was no alimony to come after, and I was the primary caregiver. I had built up savings while married but had also paid down the exes student debt, which counts against assets up here, so there was no money for her to get. After she left, she pretty much partied her brains out and I kept records of every time she fucked up, including child services being called on her by her best friend (although they were totally useless, of course). Finally, I got all the paperwork together and held it for months until she hit rock bottom, at which point I served her papers. The case was so airtight, and she was so fucked at that point, that she didn't even bother to respond, let alone show up to court.
I got full custody, child support, literally everything I asked for (although the court won't do anything to help with the money she owes me for childcare costs etc, she still technically owes me and can't go after any of my assets until she pays).
It's doable, but a LOT of work and no guarantees.
As for raising them, it's a dream come true. Having kids has been my life goal since the second grade and I appreciate every minute. If you put the work in, you really can turn out mini versions of yourself that know the things you wish you knew at that age; people just don't.
But single parenthood is objectively worse than a two parent household. I know I'm not doing as well as I could be. I can't work and care for them at the same time and had to train them to be independent from an early age. I can only spent focused attention on one at a time. For a long time I had to take them everywhere with me and couldn't, for example, quickly run to the store for milk or take them to different programs at the same time. You can only do your best, which is NOT as good as your best with a partner working with you.
That said, I say go for it. If you can find a sane woman, congratulations. If not, find some dummy with daddy issues and wide child bearing hips to pop you out some White babies. You can't fix em (Lord knows I tried) so you might as well get some use out of em before they go full catlady.
You know that, lots of women deciding to divorce knows that but fat boomers doesn't. Are completely oblivious.
You must be joking. How can you be attracted by an insectoid? Don't you see that Asians have the eyes of a bug? They are not humans.