Right wingers are obsessed with Asians for some reason. If they’re going to race mix they may as well just become full blown leftists.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
65 comments:
I can’t lie, if I found me a decent half nip, I might fo. Any more than that, I ain’t touching it. I mean the kids would at least be 3/4 white. I take that back, if she can be blindfolded with dental floss, I’ll hard pass. 😁
She'd have to be WAY more racist than me for me to even consider it.
I knew a beautiful Vietnamese girl growing up in New Orleans, and her family owned a couple of businesses out there, and most of their customers were niggers of course. Let’s just say they were for TND before TND was a thing. Lmfao. They’re our there, and some of them are pretty fucking open about it.
On.a related note, I just learned Uruguay is even Whiter than Argentina. Wikipedia says 87.7% . It's probably lower by ConPro standards but I plan on visiting there
Asian women are easier than White women, and not as intolerable as the darker races.
Any claim that they are superior to White women is pure cope.
Any claim that they are superior to White women is pure cope.
Asian women can be attractive, but of course it's not worth it regarding offspring, for either race, unless the goal were to create a larger sub race with lots of Aryan blood. Otherwise mixed Asians would probably still have healthy issues, like difficulties finding organ donors, etc..
At least they usually tend to be on the beautiful side, unlike nigger breed abominations. So if Asians want more European features like blue eyes and blonde hair, good on them. I would rather have 2 billion of those, than billions of stinky Indians.
And for our women, my take is: As long as she is white and has good genes for healthy children, I give zero fucks about how the woman behaves. She can be a good woman and stick around, or be a bitch and leave.
Of course it would be great to have a normal relationship and you can try to make it work, but healthy white children are the goal, anything good on top is just a bonus. You just need to make sure you don't get (((married))), at least not by state, and that you're not a bum, so you can keep the children.
At least they usually tend to be on the beautiful side, unlike nigger breed abominations. So if Asians want more European features like blue eyes and blonde hair, good on them. I would rather have 2 billion of those, than billions of stinky Indians.
And for our women, my take is: As long as she is white and has good genes for healthy children, I give zero fucks about how the woman behaves. She can be a good woman and stick around, or be a bitch and leave.
Of course it would be great to have a normal relationship and you can try to make it work, but healthy white children are the goal, anything good on top is just a bonus. You just need to make sure you don't get (((married))), at least not by state, and that you're not a bum, so you can keep the children.
Good genes are the goal but frankly good upbringing is just as important
Do you want your kids to be raised on goyslop or home-cooking? Raised on jew TV and public school or homeschool and parents teaching the kids their craft?
Nurture is equally important as nature, when both are combined our aryan potential is unlocked
Do you want your kids to be raised on goyslop or home-cooking? Raised on jew TV and public school or homeschool and parents teaching the kids their craft?
Nurture is equally important as nature, when both are combined our aryan potential is unlocked
> Nurture is equally important as nature, when both are combined our aryan potential is unlocked
This is correct only if you look at the current generations. But if you look at future generations, then nature is 100% and nurture is 0%.
At the end of the 19th century science has debunked the idea that acquired characteristics are passed on. Maintaining the blood pure is the most important thing.
This is correct only if you look at the current generations. But if you look at future generations, then nature is 100% and nurture is 0%.
At the end of the 19th century science has debunked the idea that acquired characteristics are passed on. Maintaining the blood pure is the most important thing.
Of course you are right, but you can still make up for these things. It's better than a fatherless child, at least. And infinitely better than failing to find the needle in the hay stack forever. My parents already had children when they were younger than me, I don't have time to be picky forever.
I don't really give a damn about tattoos and piercings either, since they don't affect genes, if she makes up for it with a pretty face. Unvaxxed would be nice, but again, needle in the hay stack...
I don't really give a damn about tattoos and piercings either, since they don't affect genes, if she makes up for it with a pretty face. Unvaxxed would be nice, but again, needle in the hay stack...
> Unvaxxed would be nice, but again, needle in the hay stack.
If they GMO injected her with non-Aryan genes, then your precious white princess is not white anymore.
If your goal was genetically white kids, you've failed. The white race is gone. Mutated away under medical mandate.
If they GMO injected her with non-Aryan genes, then your precious white princess is not white anymore.
If your goal was genetically white kids, you've failed. The white race is gone. Mutated away under medical mandate.
My man, you need to rethink this shit. First off is she’s full of tats, facial piercings, and colored hair, she’s already mentally ill, and likely on all kinds of pharma, which means the children will inherent these genes. Don’t ignore the blatant red flags. Those three things I listed are my favorite things women do. I instantly know it’s a walking basket case.
You’re also pretending we live in a sane world where those so called “healthy” children you plan on having are actually your, and under your domain. If the women decides to leave you, and you don’t care as you say, what do you think is going to happen? Do you really think the JEWdicial sistum is really going to let you have those children to raise, if to see at all?
You’re also pretending we live in a sane world where those so called “healthy” children you plan on having are actually your, and under your domain. If the women decides to leave you, and you don’t care as you say, what do you think is going to happen? Do you really think the JEWdicial sistum is really going to let you have those children to raise, if to see at all?
>she’s already mentally ill, and likely on all kinds of pharma, which means the children will inherit these genes
Doesn't seem like an argument to me. Even IF the girl is on some medication, I haven't heard of any that permanently affect the baby. And if you worry about that stuff, you'd have to worry about microplastics and all that shit too. Just raise them as healthy as you can.
>You’re also pretending we live in a sane world
That's why I said "don't be a bum". You have to be ready for this shit. Step 1 is to avoid getting legally married. Make sure you are in the best position possible to argue before court that you're providing and more responsible. If you're not legally married, she also doesn't have the house, or an "income" from your alimony, and if she is tatted with nose rings and crazy, it should be even more convincing that the kids should stay with you.
I know the courts favor muh womenz, but they can't be absolutely blatant. If that all fails, there are still plan C and D which go into "fedposting" territory.
Doesn't seem like an argument to me. Even IF the girl is on some medication, I haven't heard of any that permanently affect the baby. And if you worry about that stuff, you'd have to worry about microplastics and all that shit too. Just raise them as healthy as you can.
>You’re also pretending we live in a sane world
That's why I said "don't be a bum". You have to be ready for this shit. Step 1 is to avoid getting legally married. Make sure you are in the best position possible to argue before court that you're providing and more responsible. If you're not legally married, she also doesn't have the house, or an "income" from your alimony, and if she is tatted with nose rings and crazy, it should be even more convincing that the kids should stay with you.
I know the courts favor muh womenz, but they can't be absolutely blatant. If that all fails, there are still plan C and D which go into "fedposting" territory.
So, I'm a single Dad that got full custody of my kids from a mentally ill, tatted ex-wife. Here is my take.
First, women are statistically normal. There aren't many genetic outliers, compared to men, so the insanity is largely caused by upbringing or subversive ideologies. The kids don't necessarily inherit it. All of my exes brothers were total punks; started smoking weed at 11, drinking at 13, run ins with cops and jail, one of them literally stole the cross out of a church. My kids are nothing like that because I raised them right.
>"don't be a bum"
Yes.
When my ex ditched us, I left my job to take care of the kids and ease the transition. You can always make money but you only get a few years to mold your children: don't waste them. I spent the next five years busting my ass between work and raising them, including homeschooling. Don't let anyone tell you that single parents can't support their families while also homeschooling; you can, so long as you aren't a bum. It also helps immensly if you're already a pillar of your local community because people will help you, even if it's just as a good influence on your kids.
As for the courts, I'm in Canada. If you live with someone for six months they have every right a legally married spouse would. It's fucked.
However, I still got full custody. Part of it was luck, a lot of it was planning. As I said, I quit work to stay with the kids, so there was no alimony to come after, and I was the primary caregiver. I had built up savings while married but had also paid down the exes student debt, which counts against assets up here, so there was no money for her to get. After she left, she pretty much partied her brains out and I kept records of every time she fucked up, including child services being called on her by her best friend (although they were totally useless, of course). Finally, I got all the paperwork together and held it for months until she hit rock bottom, at which point I served her papers. The case was so airtight, and she was so fucked at that point, that she didn't even bother to respond, let alone show up to court.
I got full custody, child support, literally everything I asked for (although the court won't do anything to help with the money she owes me for childcare costs etc, she still technically owes me and can't go after any of my assets until she pays).
It's doable, but a LOT of work and no guarantees.
As for raising them, it's a dream come true. Having kids has been my life goal since the second grade and I appreciate every minute. If you put the work in, you really can turn out mini versions of yourself that know the things you wish you knew at that age; people just don't.
But single parenthood is objectively worse than a two parent household. I know I'm not doing as well as I could be. I can't work and care for them at the same time and had to train them to be independent from an early age. I can only spent focused attention on one at a time. For a long time I had to take them everywhere with me and couldn't, for example, quickly run to the store for milk or take them to different programs at the same time. You can only do your best, which is NOT as good as your best with a partner working with you.
That said, I say go for it. If you can find a sane woman, congratulations. If not, find some dummy with daddy issues and wide child bearing hips to pop you out some White babies. You can't fix em (Lord knows I tried) so you might as well get some use out of em before they go full catlady.
First, women are statistically normal. There aren't many genetic outliers, compared to men, so the insanity is largely caused by upbringing or subversive ideologies. The kids don't necessarily inherit it. All of my exes brothers were total punks; started smoking weed at 11, drinking at 13, run ins with cops and jail, one of them literally stole the cross out of a church. My kids are nothing like that because I raised them right.
>"don't be a bum"
Yes.
When my ex ditched us, I left my job to take care of the kids and ease the transition. You can always make money but you only get a few years to mold your children: don't waste them. I spent the next five years busting my ass between work and raising them, including homeschooling. Don't let anyone tell you that single parents can't support their families while also homeschooling; you can, so long as you aren't a bum. It also helps immensly if you're already a pillar of your local community because people will help you, even if it's just as a good influence on your kids.
As for the courts, I'm in Canada. If you live with someone for six months they have every right a legally married spouse would. It's fucked.
However, I still got full custody. Part of it was luck, a lot of it was planning. As I said, I quit work to stay with the kids, so there was no alimony to come after, and I was the primary caregiver. I had built up savings while married but had also paid down the exes student debt, which counts against assets up here, so there was no money for her to get. After she left, she pretty much partied her brains out and I kept records of every time she fucked up, including child services being called on her by her best friend (although they were totally useless, of course). Finally, I got all the paperwork together and held it for months until she hit rock bottom, at which point I served her papers. The case was so airtight, and she was so fucked at that point, that she didn't even bother to respond, let alone show up to court.
I got full custody, child support, literally everything I asked for (although the court won't do anything to help with the money she owes me for childcare costs etc, she still technically owes me and can't go after any of my assets until she pays).
It's doable, but a LOT of work and no guarantees.
As for raising them, it's a dream come true. Having kids has been my life goal since the second grade and I appreciate every minute. If you put the work in, you really can turn out mini versions of yourself that know the things you wish you knew at that age; people just don't.
But single parenthood is objectively worse than a two parent household. I know I'm not doing as well as I could be. I can't work and care for them at the same time and had to train them to be independent from an early age. I can only spent focused attention on one at a time. For a long time I had to take them everywhere with me and couldn't, for example, quickly run to the store for milk or take them to different programs at the same time. You can only do your best, which is NOT as good as your best with a partner working with you.
That said, I say go for it. If you can find a sane woman, congratulations. If not, find some dummy with daddy issues and wide child bearing hips to pop you out some White babies. You can't fix em (Lord knows I tried) so you might as well get some use out of em before they go full catlady.
You’re over complicating this.
Anything that is not “you” creates a schism in your family.
Cultural differences don’t reconcile, they fester and manifest as schisms in your children, which causes them to rank down in life and their cultural hierarchy.
That is why you should never marry outside your ethnicity.
Anything that is not “you” creates a schism in your family.
Cultural differences don’t reconcile, they fester and manifest as schisms in your children, which causes them to rank down in life and their cultural hierarchy.
That is why you should never marry outside your ethnicity.
For me: Asian women stay thinner/younger
looking for longer. Asian women definitely see White men as a step up and behave better by default. Typically much much MUCH lower n count.
Essentially the things most men and I look for in a woman i.e thin, virgin, well behaved, are more easily found in Asians. So I won't knock anyone for taking an Asian. Breed with a nigger/kike and you're out, that's non-negotiable.
Now, don't get me wrong, the peak of White beauty (if my type) is still the most attractive. The best looking Asians tend to have European features or plastic surgery (see the hot kpop girls), but men of stature, the type of men to hate the jews, they won't settle for a well used, shit-testing, fatty.
Even if every man here has 10 White kids, we'd still be fucked. Removing the jews fixes everything. No more niggers imported, no more funding for third world shit holes, no more whore women. We could fix it all.
What I'm saying also applies to Latinas, middle eastern, Italian etc. other non-White, but at least not a nigger or jew. If men opted for them, I at least understand.
looking for longer. Asian women definitely see White men as a step up and behave better by default. Typically much much MUCH lower n count.
Essentially the things most men and I look for in a woman i.e thin, virgin, well behaved, are more easily found in Asians. So I won't knock anyone for taking an Asian. Breed with a nigger/kike and you're out, that's non-negotiable.
Now, don't get me wrong, the peak of White beauty (if my type) is still the most attractive. The best looking Asians tend to have European features or plastic surgery (see the hot kpop girls), but men of stature, the type of men to hate the jews, they won't settle for a well used, shit-testing, fatty.
Even if every man here has 10 White kids, we'd still be fucked. Removing the jews fixes everything. No more niggers imported, no more funding for third world shit holes, no more whore women. We could fix it all.
What I'm saying also applies to Latinas, middle eastern, Italian etc. other non-White, but at least not a nigger or jew. If men opted for them, I at least understand.
>Italian
>non-white
Kindly take your bullshit and get out.
>non-white
Kindly take your bullshit and get out.
No. Swarthy as fuck, they're White adjacent at best.
Genetics proves you wrong. This D&C won’t be entertained here. Begone.
Fuck off faggot. You troll on voat and troll here. Go be a hag apologist elsewhere.
Idk about latinas (I would say European Spaniards are white) but you consider Italians non-white...?
They seem pretty white to me: https://files.catbox.moe/jgqmxm.jpg
Based Roman descendants. Especially culture wise, they are as white as it gets, same with the Greek, etc..
They seem pretty white to me: https://files.catbox.moe/jgqmxm.jpg
Based Roman descendants. Especially culture wise, they are as white as it gets, same with the Greek, etc..
>(I would say European Spaniards are white)
Mmmmm
They're *partly* White, yeah. Also part Moor, who are part Arab, part north African sand nigger. Might have to go on a case by case basis, the more rural the better.
Why do you think Mexicans are so awful? They're the most muddied "Whites"; Muslim *and* Amerindian with vestiges of White morality and work ethic. They mock us by their very existence. Spaniards are little better than Turks, and Mexicans are worse than that.
Mmmmm
They're *partly* White, yeah. Also part Moor, who are part Arab, part north African sand nigger. Might have to go on a case by case basis, the more rural the better.
Why do you think Mexicans are so awful? They're the most muddied "Whites"; Muslim *and* Amerindian with vestiges of White morality and work ethic. They mock us by their very existence. Spaniards are little better than Turks, and Mexicans are worse than that.
You seem to confuse race with ethnicity. They are two completely different things.
One can be born in Mexico, or in fucking Nigeria, and be 100% Aryan. Or one can be born in Poland and be a nigger.
Saying that Mexicans are a certain way doesn't make any sense. Some of them are White, some of them are mudblood, some of them are redskins, some of them are niggers.
One can be born in Mexico, or in fucking Nigeria, and be 100% Aryan. Or one can be born in Poland and be a nigger.
Saying that Mexicans are a certain way doesn't make any sense. Some of them are White, some of them are mudblood, some of them are redskins, some of them are niggers.
>Essentially the things most men and I look for in a woman i.e thin, virgin, well behaved, are more easily found in Asians.
you did the meme.
you did the meme.
Men want debt free, tattooless virgins and there is nothing wrong with that
i didn't deny that though did i
Asians are not virgins. They are whores for White men
It's a meme if you're a soy faggot, but I wouldn't settle for less than a thin, virgin, without bull rings. I'm aware the original was debt free virgins without tattoos.
If you're saying the meme is Asians aren't thinner on average you're simply delusional.
If you're saying the meme is Asians aren't thinner on average you're simply delusional.
Asians are not virgins. 😂
Toast message
~:~
The FST between Europeans and a group of Africans known as the Bantu is 0.23. That’s how far apart they are, genetically. For reference, the FST between the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus) is 0.103. This is half the European-African distance despite the two monkeys being classified as separate species. The FST between two gorilla species–Gorilla gorilla and Gorilla beringei–is 0.04, one-sixth the white/black distance. The FST between humans and Neanderthals is less than 0.08, or about one-third the white-black distance. The FST between humans and Homo erectus is 0.17, three-quarters the white/black distance. Europeans and Africans–officially not even different subspecies–are more genetically distant than two chimpanzee species, two gorilla species, humans and Homo neanderthalensis, and humans and Homo erectus.
The FST between Europeans and southeastern Asians is 0.125. The FST between Europeans and West Asians is 0.15. These are roughly the distance between humans and homo erectus. The FST between Africans and Asians is between 0.223 and 0.263, higher than the European-African distance. The FST between Europeans and Australasians is between 0.203 and 0.224, roughly the same as Europeans and Africans. The FST between Europeans and Indios–those who came to the American continents across the Bering Straight–is 0.167. Again, roughly the distance to homo erectus. The African-Indio FST is 0.333. Even the FST between southeastern Asians and Australasians is between 0.174 and 0.212. Each of the genetic distances between the five “races” of humanity is greater than the distances between separate nonhuman species.
And then there's the fact that hapa sons are generally doomed to be miserable incels.
Something Liberals can't wrap their head around is the fact that there is a difference between IQ and moral virtue and *moral virtue is more important for success*.
Bug people and even some niggers may do well in an IQ test, but it's in creativity that Aryans dominate.
There is nothing on this planet that was not invented by a White man. Let that sink in.
Bug people have invented nothing.