New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
39
posted 23 days ago by RealWildRanter on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +39Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
13
devotech2 on scored.co
23 days ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror ) 1 child
>its not about that

No. It's about both.

Even if there were 0 chance at creating a child, I wouldn't want niggers raping white women. Or even white men raping white women.

Being good to our own people also involves being good to our own women outside of pure pragmatism.
Brannvesen on scored.co
23 days ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Agreed, just saying that before (((subversion))), we didn't need specific laws against things like rape or theft. Because every White man had the Christian morale to not commit such crimes.

This is also part of the plan towards creating a dystopian mass surveillance society. Something the jew gets support for through diversity.
devotech2 on scored.co
23 days ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
Oh yeah. Most certainly. Way back when, a caught rapist would just be lynched. But that was back when vigilante Justice wasn't (((illegal))) yet. It was still like that in the rural south and appalachia until circa the 1960s. Usually the KKK (this is literally why the KKK existed. The infrastructure of the south was destroyed after the civil war and the KKK stepped in to enforce justice. No, it wasnt an organization for the sole purpose of hating niggers, or there wouldnt be any KKK chapters in places where blacks didnt exist) or local townspeople would take care of the issue themselves. The police only got involved if it required an investigation. Emmet Till wasn't killed because he was a nigger, he was killed because he raped a white woman. He would have gotten the same treatment if he were a white man who raped a woman, but it wouldn't have went anywhere because no racial victim points.
Toast message