You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)
This was clearly written by some fedora-tipping retard who isn't nearly as smart as they think they are. Probably because, like most of the internet these days, they just spend all their time in hugboxes (spoilers: this forum is a hugbox) where people who agree with them just tell each other how smart they are for thinking alike.
>the status quo
Okay so it's literally just saying that if you aren't a normie, you should always be seeking to overthrow every established system? No matter what? That's called fucking *anarchy*.
The author might have thought he was contextualizing it within existing flawed systems. But because the author isn't very smart, that's not what they wrote.
>binary list of acceptable and unacceptable
Ironically this very forum does this. Should I say something critical about any conspiracy theory ever to prove the point?
>friends based on predefined criteria
Literally everybody does this. Christ that's literally how people's preferences in romantic relationships works. People will take a hard stance on 'no fatties'. That's a checked box on a bureaucratic form.
>lives to manage what is okay for others to do
Again, literally this fucking forum.
This is once again a plea for anarchy. "Love is love!" "No human is illegal!" "It's not your business what drugs I do!"
>the normie only considers how, not why
Oh right, the same "just asking questions" that gave women the right to vote, unleashed feral niggers, and filled the country with jews?
>the status quo
Okay so it's literally just saying that if you aren't a normie, you should always be seeking to overthrow every established system? No matter what? That's called fucking *anarchy*.
The author might have thought he was contextualizing it within existing flawed systems. But because the author isn't very smart, that's not what they wrote.
>binary list of acceptable and unacceptable
Ironically this very forum does this. Should I say something critical about any conspiracy theory ever to prove the point?
>friends based on predefined criteria
Literally everybody does this. Christ that's literally how people's preferences in romantic relationships works. People will take a hard stance on 'no fatties'. That's a checked box on a bureaucratic form.
>lives to manage what is okay for others to do
Again, literally this fucking forum.
This is once again a plea for anarchy. "Love is love!" "No human is illegal!" "It's not your business what drugs I do!"
>the normie only considers how, not why
Oh right, the same "just asking questions" that gave women the right to vote, unleashed feral niggers, and filled the country with jews?