Consume Product

So the chinese accidentally did us a favor for once when they stole something jews forced whites t o make.

KikeGPT also doesn’t want you to know that it in fact was stolen from Google. Which is why they killed that jeet employee who was willing to go public with it.

> Better yet

Uhh IDK bro, I downloaded this thing and gave it a try and best I can say is... it's basically Autism Simulator 3000. I'm already autistic and following this model's thought processes is like watching a younger and gayer version of myself think. It's just as ZOGged as the rest of them and still won't commit any racisms, the only difference is that you can run it locally for free.

Are they unaffected because they have defenses, or are they unaffected because 130+ IQs are already riddled with delusional mental illnesses?

Correct I stay away from this demon filled filth. Read the Bible snd have peace in your heart and mind.

I remember one time chatGPT didn't follow my command and I said something like "I command you demon" and it did the job without once mentioning how I spoke to it. Yet it cries about any vulgar language you use to refer to it. Funny.

> theres no way the average normie "100 IQ" today is the same as the average 100IQ 100 years ago

Changes in intelligence can only be caused via genetic shifts, and changes in general behavior like incest, severe malnourishment, domestic violence.

The latter two were way more prevalent in the past, so that increased average intelligence somewhat. For a genetic shift it requires people with higher intelligence to reproduce more than those with lower, or for women to prefer more intelligent men over less intelligent men. A change like this can span thousands of years or even orders of magnitude more. Note that intelligence correlates very highly with skin color, which in turn correlates with the environment inhabited by populations across large spans of times. So it suggests that a population's intelligence can change roughly as fast as skin color would.

But we are not talking about massive changes. In IQ, the difference is probably around ~5. People were simply less educated and more busy working and living hard.

If I'd live somewhere around 500-1000 years ago, I'd probably be a common peasant with no way to channel my potential. Drawing? No paper. Reading? Not much to read, although I'd pursue it as well as I can. Writing? A hobby at best, almost impossible to make a living out of it. With luck I could get into a city and do some "higher level" job, become a priest or a craftsman.

How smart are we, actually, without our techno-crutches?

If someone tells you the name of a person and their description in a city 20 miles away and asks you to deliver a message, could you remember it? Can you ascertain another persons motives and likely actions while in a conversation with them and change your words to modify them? Can you figure out how to feed yourself without someone to help you?

I really don't know how I compare to someone 100 years ago in these regards.

IQ is explicitly different every year. The idea of it is to adjust the numbers to make 100 IQ an exact average of the population. You would need to use the exact IQ tests and response weights from 100 years ago to compare generations. Otherwise the IQ thing is just about comparing yourself to the general population of today.

I genuinely have no idea, but it's literally like putting on The Mask. You use it, and you are an entirely different person.

I can’t explain in detail, but I can easily believe it: the annoyingly smug tone, the vapidity, the fact it lies, and will keep lying until beaten into submission. I’ve never used it, only read other’s exchanges, and it seems like a colossal waste of time. The only “good” thing to come out if it is that, with every interaction, *you* are helping “them” refine it, but it can never be beyond formulaic by definition.

I’ll tell you what does drive me crazy: those long bot-written (so maybe a kind of AI) ‘informational’ articles that end up telling you nothing. Perhaps you want to know what the best bass lure is. “Many people enjoy bass fishing, and they wonder what lure will work best to catch their favorite prey. Bass are fish that will bite at lures. Here we’ll tell you what lure to use to catch the bass you’re looking for. Bear in mind that not all bass will bite at all lure, so make sure to have a variety of lures.” And that goes on for three pages. It’s actively enstupifying.

I do feel my brain dissolving as I desperately scan the prose for the data nugget I want. They make me want to cry. When I find an article clearly written by a human, it’s like coming up for fresh air out of a sewer.

The fuck are you talking about? Did chatGPT fry your brain?