I've been seeing a lot of Russians talking about how Hitler and Germany were evil because they murdered 30m+ Slavs and Hitler wanted to genocide them all.
Does anyone know what their sources are based on and what the truth of the matter is?
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
Get them to read Mein Kampf and show that Hitler was at war with the jews who took over Russia and not the slavic peoples themselves, who he doesnt really say much about, positive or negative.
Obviously, tried that line. The usual is that jews were removed from positions of power eventually by the Russians and therefore the jews didn't really take over Russia or something like that so Hitler was against Russians not jews.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
>Does anyone know what their sources are based on
Jewish hoaxes.
>and what the truth of the matter is?
1. The NKVD marched behind the Red Army and slaughtered anyone who retreated, even tactically. The USSR literally almost doubled its fucking material and supply requirements solely to field a second army whose only job was to kill anyone in the first army who went east instead of west. That’s why the deaths were so high.
2. Jews publicly wrote about killing all Slavs and stealing their land. [Hitler considered](https://i.postimg.cc/9XWydRwp/Aryans.jpg) them Aryan [(because they are; they’re white).](https://i.postimg.cc/jdDwczxz/Aryans-2.png)
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Been thinking about that, it requires some deeper knowledge on Russia. If you only know the (((western narrative))), they wont be easily convinced. Too bad Alexander Slavros went into hiding.
Point out what anti-nazism means in the west. That for example, it doesn't mean being for your nation and country but against your country existing.
Western anti-nazism is closer to what the memorial foundation and the likes sought to remake Russian history into. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_undesirable_organizations_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memorial_(society)
Is it really any stretch that plans and actions were shall we say, exaggerated at they least?
Or that the Anglo-French alliance wouldn't have tried to use terror tactics despite heir supposed democracy if they had been the ones trying to invade the Soviet-Union?
Well, they had Bulgaria, Croatia, with efforts to set up new states in Serbia and Belarus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lokot_Autonomy Lokot autonomy was an effort to establish a Russian state but the problem was the lack of Russians to man it and there could be little oversight. While Romania could easily have been invaded as well.
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
Yeah, it's tricky when you only know the Western narratives.
Here's an example of what I'm dealing with from the Russian:
"the only time the Bolsheviks wanted to do a revolution in Germany. Hitler was actually on their side😂
I know you don't know history but look it up you would be amazed.
also i repeat the revolution here was sponsored by Wilhelm II
you think he was a communist?"
I haven't even heard the Wilhelm II sponsored the Bolshevik revolution in Russia angle before.
I think they claim Wilhelm "sponsored" communism because he kicked Lenin out of Germany in hopes he would weaken Russia, but I doubt he expected him to actually overthrow the government.
More Russian narratives: "also Weimar Germany was an anti-Communist state.
Weimar Republic was made as a result of defeat of Bolsheviks which Hitler was on that side💀
when Freinkops was hunting Communist that is when Hitler ran to DAP.
The Weimar gov in power in 1938 was more anti-communist that NSDAP"