I'm thinking it'll do a full 360 and come back around to where it used to be. The landscape is entirely unsustainable, and change inevitable. Five, ten years from now it could be entirely new, but it's challenging to predict. We could end up in a world where dating as a concept has become detached from its original meaning, and has become something with no human involvement, or we could go even further back around and arrive at medieval style setups because nobody would have a chance.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
3 comments:
3
1 year ago
3 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+3Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
It's already worse. You think any of those people have their own personalities let alone their own dialogue? They just mimic what they see on TV and memes.
Dating has changed significantly in just a few decades.
My mother, not being particularly ancient by any means, doesn't understand zoomer dating *at all*. She just can't comprehend it.
My great grandfather wouldn't understand her generation's dating in the 80s at all likewise. And regarding zoomer dating, he'd likely vomit at the prospect of something as absurd as a "situationship" or "friends with benefits". He courted and married the same woman for his entire life. She never remarried or dated again, nor had any thought to do so, for 20 years after he died, until she died. That's how it used to be.
There's one of 2 things that can happen: it will either reach a precipice and revert back to what it was at least 40 years ago. That, or it will cease to exist as a concept, casual "relationships" become the only thing that the average person does, and people will stay together for the sole purpose of childrearing, should they choose to do so, while openly cheating off to the side, because adultery (the cool kids call it "polyamory") will be widely accepted. Men and women will mentally, physically, and emotionally destroy themselves by seeking to justify something that everyone knows is actually wrong. Just look at the average poly couple, everyone involved is typically a hideously disgusting walking skinsuit of rot and despair. This is doubly true of K-type races (whites *in particular*, but also east asians to a smaller extent), who are naturally monogamous.
There are 2 aspects at play here: one is feminism, the other is the association of sex with feminism, which is wholly jewish. Whites are naturally monogamous. Even if feminism were to play out as it did, witbout the sex aspect, whites would still be in exclusive couples. Dating and courtship would be largely the same because it is racial nature for both of us. Jews added sex to feminism to destroy both men and women, and dating, entirely. Barring everything else that is inherently wrong with feminism: associating sex with it and destroying our very nature, is the death blow to the ability for whites to have proper family units and couplings in general. Both men and women think about sex on a constant basis and don't even realize that if they were married in a traditional society, then they could have it whenever the fuck they wanted to.
My mother, not being particularly ancient by any means, doesn't understand zoomer dating *at all*. She just can't comprehend it.
My great grandfather wouldn't understand her generation's dating in the 80s at all likewise. And regarding zoomer dating, he'd likely vomit at the prospect of something as absurd as a "situationship" or "friends with benefits". He courted and married the same woman for his entire life. She never remarried or dated again, nor had any thought to do so, for 20 years after he died, until she died. That's how it used to be.
There's one of 2 things that can happen: it will either reach a precipice and revert back to what it was at least 40 years ago. That, or it will cease to exist as a concept, casual "relationships" become the only thing that the average person does, and people will stay together for the sole purpose of childrearing, should they choose to do so, while openly cheating off to the side, because adultery (the cool kids call it "polyamory") will be widely accepted. Men and women will mentally, physically, and emotionally destroy themselves by seeking to justify something that everyone knows is actually wrong. Just look at the average poly couple, everyone involved is typically a hideously disgusting walking skinsuit of rot and despair. This is doubly true of K-type races (whites *in particular*, but also east asians to a smaller extent), who are naturally monogamous.
There are 2 aspects at play here: one is feminism, the other is the association of sex with feminism, which is wholly jewish. Whites are naturally monogamous. Even if feminism were to play out as it did, witbout the sex aspect, whites would still be in exclusive couples. Dating and courtship would be largely the same because it is racial nature for both of us. Jews added sex to feminism to destroy both men and women, and dating, entirely. Barring everything else that is inherently wrong with feminism: associating sex with it and destroying our very nature, is the death blow to the ability for whites to have proper family units and couplings in general. Both men and women think about sex on a constant basis and don't even realize that if they were married in a traditional society, then they could have it whenever the fuck they wanted to.
Toast message