Consume Product

I understand what you mean. The problem with the modern church is that they hold the “nice grandma that bakes cookies for you” ideologies of love everyone and violence is never the answer. Now, don’t get me wrong, those grandmas are essential to a good society. But Their types of ideologies should not lead the church.

And a majority of modern Christians have hearts in the right place. Of course, the rest use god as a cope, but not most.

Remember. If we do not lead them, Jews will.

The problem with trying to achieve a "correct interpretation" of the Bible is that it will only add one more sect to the big ol' list.

If you are genuinely trying to follow the teachings outlined in the Bible, then you might be in the wrong religion. The purpose of a thing is what it does. Christianity's core purpose is to validate egos via ideological conformity, as liberals do.

In the absence of personal merit and objective virtue, humans like to raise their sense of self-worth through group identity... and nothing is requires less merit than giving lip service to other people's ideas. With that they become "one of the good type of people... not like those bad people with bad opinions." This is of course reinforced through regular ideological circlejerking.

Edit: and you're not going to change a single thing about this. No one can. If everyone is just going to believe as they want to anyway, why even pretend you all believe the same shit?

Your choices are: disassociate from this group of cretins, or... associate yourself with this group of cretins. Either stop calling yourself Christian, or accept that you're a *willing part* of the *only* group funding non-White immigration to White countries more than kikes do.

> I have on seldom occasion met a Christian who I agree with at any significant theological level.
>
>> username: JesusSupporter33

Which is it? Are we not to go into the world and spread the gospel and good news? To save people, who should, in turn, save others?

This is how Christianity spread throughout the world.

It is not my place to cast judgment or damnation on others; I do however point out things like Leviticus 18:20-22 quite often. It's quick, easy for the average idiot to read, and very clear regardless of which translation is used.

- Don't fuck your neighbor's wife.

- Don't allow your children to be killed or sacrificed.

- Don't have gay sex.

That covers a lot of modern nonsense, clearly and quickly.

There are plenty of other biblical laws, obviously don't kill people, etc. The Christians who can't follow these basic, easy to understand laws, imo, are no more Christians than the jews who say they are White.

I have no issue moving on from them and not speaking or interacting with them. I try not to judge them, that is not my place, I am not one who has not sinned myself, so I do not cast the first stone. That said, I don't see removing people from my life or refusing to interact with people like this as "passing judgment".

Now, when people actively interpret Leviticus 18:22 as somehow not meaning "don't have gay sex", that's where I have a problem with them. It is blasphemy. Even when the Catholic Church and the Methodists do it and start appointing gay priests and pastors.

Leviticus 18:20, modern Christians say "but it's ok to have an open marriage and/or cheat on your spouse" Wrong. Fuck around and, I guess, find out when your time here is up.

Leviticus 18:21, I replied to a comment on a Biblical post of mine about the Synagogue of Satan recently [where I argued that abortion is child sacrifice](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/19A1LYMaq0/the-synagogue-of-satan-as-explai/c/4ZHlXQiD618?d=2), in a way close enough that Leviticus 18:21 definitely applies.

No reply, no one else commented. Fine.

In situations like that, I usually take the "proselytizing" approach right away, rather than attempting to evangelize. Why? Because I feel strongly enough that a fetus is a life and a child, as God's own word has stated, and that anyone killing, or allowing to be killed, their child is damning themselves for eternity.

That's significant. Evangelizing is a lot of sunshine and rainbows. It's great to bring people to know the story of Jesus. But anyone actively defying the Lord in heinous ways, or actively supporting it, should be bluntly told how it is blasphemous.

Anyway, I guess I forgot what other part of your post I was originally replying to. Sorry. Lol.

I guess when you hear "Christians" blaspheming the Bible, cut them out of your life, or call them out, or firmly educate them.

I'm an atheist simply because it is physically impossible for deities to exist as imagined. Even if there was a parallel dimension for afterlife, it doesn't make sense. If you speak, there are vibrations that ripple through the air, which the ears can perceive and are interpreted as sounds. If the range is too high, it cannot be heard. Atmosphere and wind are the hard limit. So whatever prayers you say, it only reaches your own ear. It would require someone in that parallel dimension to be very close to you, right at that place at that moment. If you only think it, these are just bio-electric signals coursing around in your brain. While to yourself it makes sense, to anyone else it would be incomprehensible even if they could perceive it.

I came closer to the concept of what a deity could be. A simulation. You are the user, you run a simulation, and it plays out with an initial state over time. Now, a computer is quite powerful, so you can run many simulations and have them be played out at rapid speed. In that case, do you care what happens? If you have 500 simulations each with millions of data points? You may look into it arbitrarily, maybe to find some anomaly or bug.

Applied to real-life, this is what is possible: There is a deity that is not subject to space, time and possibly logic itself, as everything in the universe is, and the entire universe is created for an unknown reason (curiosity?) by unknown means starting and ending after a lot of time. Humans just happened to be one short-lived outcome somewhere in all of it - a little spark, only perceptible if you pay very close attention. Time is only a thing for us because we live and perceive time at a pace of 1 second per second.

In fact the entirety of the universe, where things actually happen, like planets forming, stars shining, black holes consuming, moons orbiting is a tiny spark, whereas the heat death and entropy is like 99%+ of its total lifetime. The good stuff happens in a tiny fraction of its lifetime - just like how an explosion is special for a short moment, and then it's just smoke. And what is actually relevant is the filament of the structure of galaxy clusters, or whatever pattern governs that.

To say "existence is a simulation" is selling it short, as if Earth is the main character. But why would it be? Given the vastness of the observed universe, how arrogant is it to believe that we are special? What if life on Earth is akin to mold on bread - are you excited about that? Life on Earth existed for 3-4 billion years, and 2000 years is 0.0005% of that. That's the time span where we are special to God, right?

Anyway, I don't believe any of this either. But it is more plausible than an omnipotent deity intervening in trivial parts of our lives. Of course this means muslims are retarded with their sandnigger pedo deity, jews are retarded to worship a malevolent fire deity, and streetshitters are retarded to worship... whatever the fuck they have. All of these religions are an extension of the general behaviors and cultures of people.

But people need religion. 95%+ do not function well without it. Somehow morality gets discarded without it, meaning of life too, the concept of honor too. There are a lot of benefits to be religious, but it is a luxury that requires wilful ignorance, and considering ignorance a virtue. The "I believe despite evidence" stance, or even getting emboldened by opposition. The process of rationalization - putting your cognitive abilities into work to make sense of the nonsense.

Whatever change needs to occur in our countries (extermination of niggers and kikes), Christianity has to support it. Or a new religion has to take its place that does. The absence of religion is poison to a culture, and jews latch onto it.

Maybe I am simple minded: I hate niggers because they are subhuman filth, I hate kikes because they are like malevolent demons that also haul in niggers, I hate faggots because they fell to degeneracy and spread it. I ONLY want to deal with Whites, everyone else (not Japanese) is some kind of garbage that is best exterminated. The ideal is to have entire planet to only consist of Whites. What religion stands for that? None.

>But what does Christ say to the rich man who asks what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? The answer, if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. So yes, there are terms on eternal life; Jesus lists various conditions multiple times.

Isn't this just idleness? If all I need to do is refrain from sinning, couldn't I just sit around playing video games all day (not a sin as far as I know)? Or just die?

It doesn't make sense to me that we were created to **not** do things. Animals don't sin, so why even have humans if there isn't something we need to do?