New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
15
posted 6 days ago by WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +15Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-1
deleteme1234 on scored.co
4 days ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror ) 1 child
> list?

Let's dumb it down for Goy McGoy:

- Iraq
- Syria
- Lebanon
- Libya
- Somalia
- Iran


It's direct testimony from General Wesley Clark, which no one has stepped to counter, and events in the aforementioned countries prove that he was right.
IGOexiled on scored.co
4 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Where is the testimony from Wesley Clark is what I was asking. Where is any primary source that isn't hearsay from an Alex Jones affiliate?

The guy in the suit said it was a piece of paper. Where's an image of the paper?

One of us believes in things he's never seen.

Look I can do the same thing--

Countries that Russia wants to topple:

* Japan
* Germany
* Ukraine
* Syria

https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2024/12/russia-japan-new-diplomacy?lang=en

Wow. It's almost like opponents blame each other and you can't trust words... that must be a new thing no one ever lied before.
deleteme1234 on scored.co
3 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> Where is the testimony from Wesley Clark is what I was asking.

The lazyness you display speaks volumes.

19 seconds into the video I linked. That's him.

Longer version below (keywords for newfag Goy McGoy: "Wesley Clark on 7 countries").

https://youtu.be/YNOWeUH1PDk


> Look I can do the same thing--
> Countries that Russia wants to topple:

Difference is that his testimony in 2007 has proved right today. Look into his other speeches / interviews if you're intellectually honest.

Eg. https://youtu.be/TY2DKzastu8

Eg. https://youtu.be/UcWs4TFSjrY
IGOexiled on scored.co
3 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Original list From SecDef after 9/11, not from a general in the past two decades. To me it makes a difference, because there is nuance in command structure.

I wouldn't have to ask for sources if there were fewer omissions in your claims.
Toast message