of course i know not to take (((omegle agitators))) too seriously, especially one with the presentation that he has (showing up on stream in a tank top, monotone voice, wigger catchphrases, etc) but i liked the fact that he named the jew consistently. Being a former (((Journalist))) didn't help his trustworthiness either but what can you do
Anyway, recently i saw a debate between him and some commie weakling and i thought i'd put it on as background noise, maybe i could learn something new from martinez but i closed the debate in disgust within the first ~5 minutes because he claimed the following
>fascism and national socialism were NOT explicitly anti-marxist and in fact are very compatible WITH marxism
>Hitler and Mussolini were both marxists
Unfortunately i cannot find the clip anymore to post it here but be my guest to look for it. Anyway what the fuck is he on about?
Thoughts on the man?
He's half right on the "Hitler and Mussolini were marxists" point. Hitler wasn't. He never was. Hitler was pretty much a complete german normie until he joined the DAP. Mussolini was a marxist, until he theorized fascism. Mussolini was political for his entire life and was born into a socialist family. Also, unlike Hitler.
Fascism was created as a synthesis of sorelian marxism (a different brand of marxism advocating violence and a vanguard party. It's also an obvious influence on leninism), new age Italian nationalism, and traditionalism.
Yes, fascism exists as a combination of two polar opposites. Therefore, so does national socialism. That means it is somewhat compatible with marxism.
Fascism is not compatible with *all* marxist points, but it is certainly compatible with a lot of them.
At least, sorelian marxism and traditional leninism and related ideologies. Fascism is not compatible with non-authoritarian marxism and anarchism.
Fascism is most incompatible with typical American conservatism and the libertarian new age left. The ideologies it is not incompatible with are soviet socialism and traditionalism/nationalism in general as those are the ideals that came together to birth it.
Classical fascism was even amicable towards leninism, and you can consider the Spanish Civil War as predominantly two groups of leftists fighting each other until Franco fucked up his party.
It's a strange ideology when you actually put forth effort into understanding its origins, but these 4 things in combination are absolute anathema to jews: socialism, tradition, hierarchy, religion. Which is why fascism worked so well and why they had to destroy it.
Why is marx more well known than sorel? Despite the fact that sorel, overall, had more influence on everyone than the original Marx did? Because sorelianism is dangerous. It's better to just have everyone be mindless cultural marxist zombies than violent revolutionaries.
Franco was a conservative, he was the thing that the party didn't like. He didn't have much to do with it at all until he was able to maneuver his way into a position with his military rank after Riveras death. Afterwards he purged most of the leftists in the party and made spain a vassal state of America after ww2.
Franco really wasn't much of anything. He was a supporter of mainstream conservative parties and Carlists who sat around doing nothing. He was given emergency power and duped the Falange into making him their leader. He was the champion of nothing much really. He fucked up domestic policy worse than his peers in Germany and Italy and caused a second communist revolt in the 1940s. He threw the axis under the bus, tried to get in good favor with the allies, and failed at that too. The 50s were good, but the 50s were booming everywhere. It can't specifically be attributed to him. His government championed the memory of a party that he killed by completely changing its ideology, and the legacy of a man he let die in prison, to vye for legitimacy with the populace that would rather have had Rivera but considered Franco the best that they could get
He did nothing to fight for anything except stalling for a while I guess. But he literally forked over a military base to the US and the CIA was active within his government. He did virtually nothing to continue anything to actually affect worldly judaism in any way despite the fact that he knew better and despite the fact that he had a nation that could have done so. Effectively, he was and remained a conservative.
Young people are either zealous supporters of him or despise him. Old people usually don't give a fuck about him because he was not very effective or memorable as a leader in any aspect. He just kind of existed.
T. Spain.
Are you familiar with the Atocha bombing? I want to ask about a man convicted in that episode but won't waste your time if you aren't familiar with it.