After they started to press me, I paid ~500€ once it amounted to that. Then I did never again, which probably amounted to 1000€+. When I moved I didn't register my new home, because I knew they'd tell the GEZ my address, so that I get a letter every month again. It was a total peace of mind. Then I left Germany because fuck all of it.
1 year ago15 points(+0/-0/+15Score on mirror)2 children
Public service, i.e state propaganda from the jew box can either be funded with taxes or a loicense. The difference is that the loicense you can opt out from and nothing will happen. They will kvetch loud, but can't do shit about it. Can't opt out from tax.
The US must have been one of the first countries to make it tax funded, much easier for (((lobbyists))) to pass such law. Probably very difficult to get anyone to pay the loicense too and high risk for the inspector to get shot when peeping through the windows of peoples homes like a creep.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)4 children
The loicense is for watching BBC, or listening to BBC radio stations only. Despite the misleading name "TV loicense". It has nothing to do with the jew box device itself.
Most people never watch BBC on their jew box, they watch the commercial channels only, which you do not need a loicense for. Despite what the TV loicense inspectors claim.
Now, the TV loicense inspectors work for a private company who pays BBC, then they send out their goons (who are not intimidating by any means). Every single one I ever seen has been a cucked loser who would flee if I just raised my voice.
These two legged creatures are hired to spy on people for this company, and their mission is to gather evidence that you have been watching BBC on your jew box. Because they lack authority they are very limited in what they can legally do, think of how little you can legally do if you wanted to spy on your neighbor, and what your neighbor can legally do to you if he catch you peeping through your windows or some degenerate behavior like that.
If (and this is a big if) they can prove that you have watched BBC, without paying the TV loicense, you can get a £1000 fine in UK. Most other countries however have no consequences for not paying. The inspectors will however lie and prey on peoples ignorance to get more people to pay, even tho it's actually optional.
Where in [The Communications Act 2003](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/pdfs/ukpga_20030021_en.pdf) does it specify it is only for watching the BBC ?
Here is the relevant text.
363 Licence required for use of TV receiver
(1) A television receiver must not be installed or used unless the installation and use of the receiver is authorised by a licence under this Part.
(2) A person who installs or uses a television receiver in contravention of
subsection (1) is guilty of an offence.
(3) A person with a television receiver in his possession or under his control who—
(a) intends to install or use it in contravention of subsection (1), or
(b) knows, or has reasonable grounds for believing, that another person
intends to install or use it in contravention of that subsection, is guilty of an offence.
(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.
(5) Subsection (1) is not contravened by anything done in the course of the business of a dealer in television receivers solely for one or more of the following purposes—
(a) installing a television receiver on delivery;
(b) demonstrating, testing or repairing a television receiver.
(6) The Secretary of State may by regulations exempt from the requirement of a licence under subsection (1) the installation or use of television receivers—
(a) of such descriptions,
(b) by such persons,
(c) in such circumstances, and
(d) for such purposes, as may be provided for in the regulations.
(7) Regulations under subsection (6) may make any exemption for which such regulations provide subject to compliance with such conditions as may be specified in the regulations.
TV Licensing is a private company which pays the BBC a fixed fee and in return given the right to monitor and collect TV license fees.
The fee was introduced to finance the BBC, first as a radio license, in the days when few people had a radio and the BBC began broadcasting. It was extended to the TV for the same reason - expensive service, few recipients.
Americans get all excited about it because it is charged seperately and called a license. PBS and NPR is just paid by everybody through taxes. In a country where some states require a license to cut hair or do interior decorating.
In old apartment buildings up north, every apartment has a big hallway and a hole in the door with a big heavy metal hatch for mailbox. Back in the days, there was so many stories of TV loicense people opening this hatch from the outside trying to listen through it to hear if someone was watching the jew box.
So many times people would notice, thinking it was some creep or a burglar trying to break inside, so they'd kick the hatch to lock the arm of the inspector then pushing it in until the inspectors arm looks like a dead raisin, dogs used to bite the arm, growling and dragging the arm inwards, the bigger dog, the better. Some would lock the arm then open the door to confront that fucker, often waking up all the neighbors who then took turns to beat the shit out of the inspector.
At one point, a very dedicated inspector tried to climb inside through the chimney, but this chimney wasn't connected to any fireplace inside but went right to the large diesel boiler in the basement were he burled like a kike in a holohoax story.
1 year ago13 points(+0/-0/+13Score on mirror)1 child
Nobody in the Uk should pay that pedo institution a penny. Visit commonlawassent for multiple instances of license demand rebuttals. Many people do not pay this unenforceable bullshit.
I don't mind requiring a license for TV. It is a service that you can choose to pay for, or not. If you want to watch TV broadcasts, then it is reasonable that you have to pay for them.
But what pisses me off about this is how much it makes official "the process is the punishment." Even if you aren't watching TV, and thus are completely legal, they are threatening you with nuisance visits if you don't pay up. That's fucked.
But it's not exclusive to the UK. In America, it's not uncommon to see an official advertisement sign in the TSA line of an airport with a man tying his shoes with the text "Isn't getting dressed once a day enough?" intending to get you to *purchase* TSA Pre-Check.
Most people never watch BBC on their jew box, they watch the commercial channels only, which you do not need a loicense for. Despite what the TV loicense inspectors claim.
Now, the TV loicense inspectors work for a private company who pays BBC, then they send out their goons (who are not intimidating by any means). Every single one I ever seen has been a cucked loser who would flee if I just raised my voice.
These two legged creatures are hired to spy on people for this company, and their mission is to gather evidence that you have been watching BBC on your jew box. Because they lack authority they are very limited in what they can legally do, think of how little you can legally do if you wanted to spy on your neighbor, and what your neighbor can legally do to you if he catch you peeping through your windows or some degenerate behavior like that.
If (and this is a big if) they can prove that you have watched BBC, without paying the TV loicense, you can get a £1000 fine in UK. Most other countries however have no consequences for not paying. The inspectors will however lie and prey on peoples ignorance to get more people to pay, even tho it's actually optional.
Here is the relevant text.
363 Licence required for use of TV receiver
(1) A television receiver must not be installed or used unless the installation and use of the receiver is authorised by a licence under this Part.
(2) A person who installs or uses a television receiver in contravention of
subsection (1) is guilty of an offence.
(3) A person with a television receiver in his possession or under his control who—
(a) intends to install or use it in contravention of subsection (1), or
(b) knows, or has reasonable grounds for believing, that another person
intends to install or use it in contravention of that subsection, is guilty of an offence.
(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.
(5) Subsection (1) is not contravened by anything done in the course of the business of a dealer in television receivers solely for one or more of the following purposes—
(a) installing a television receiver on delivery;
(b) demonstrating, testing or repairing a television receiver.
(6) The Secretary of State may by regulations exempt from the requirement of a licence under subsection (1) the installation or use of television receivers—
(a) of such descriptions,
(b) by such persons,
(c) in such circumstances, and
(d) for such purposes, as may be provided for in the regulations.
(7) Regulations under subsection (6) may make any exemption for which such regulations provide subject to compliance with such conditions as may be specified in the regulations.
https://expats.de/en/gez-in-germany/
TV Licensing is a private company which pays the BBC a fixed fee and in return given the right to monitor and collect TV license fees.
The fee was introduced to finance the BBC, first as a radio license, in the days when few people had a radio and the BBC began broadcasting. It was extended to the TV for the same reason - expensive service, few recipients.
Americans get all excited about it because it is charged seperately and called a license. PBS and NPR is just paid by everybody through taxes. In a country where some states require a license to cut hair or do interior decorating.