I mean prostitution is really just rape-with-consent. Your pimp consents to having you raped, that is. And her pimps are the OF shareholders who give her 10% and call it a creator commission or whatever.
I'm not saying she's a good one, i'm just saying that we should focus on the structures and organisations that mislead people, rather than focusing on mislead people.
I categorically disagree. Focusing on structures when the people aren't moral cannot be expected to improve the situation, because immoral people will naturally seek out immoral structures. Whether the pimp is a ghetto rat thug or a synagogue rat investor, whores seek them for what they promise: a life where they don't have to make the effort to be chaste for years and then faithful for decades, where they can rut like the base animal they are. Living a decent life *does* take effort, and doesn't provide pleasure on demand, whereas the whore can buy attention with her cunt, convert that attention to money, then buy props like drugs or clothes that will feel rewarding ... for a while.
You have to go straight at the problem, which is females choosing to be whores (and males choosing to be whoremongers). Doing that first requires directly acknowledging the problem, that they are not being raped (forced to have sex by someone else), they are fornicating.
She fornicated.
I'm not saying she's a good one, i'm just saying that we should focus on the structures and organisations that mislead people, rather than focusing on mislead people.
You have to go straight at the problem, which is females choosing to be whores (and males choosing to be whoremongers). Doing that first requires directly acknowledging the problem, that they are not being raped (forced to have sex by someone else), they are fornicating.