He pushed catholicism in a majority protestant country, he was allied with France in a country where everyone hated France, and there were a lot of disputes about the heir to the throne. Being angry with him was fine, actually, but the replacement was worse for britain and for the anglosphere at large.
>Also, what's the relation between Jews and Protestants?
It's long winded.
Originally, British protestantism and puritanism had a belief in British israelites. Which was a belief that the original israelites from the Bible came to Britain, and that the British are their descendants. Part of this viewpoint was that the false jews must be converted to bring about the second coming of christ.
At some point, because of some jewish trickery, because Cromwell allowed jews into England specifically to convert them to Christianity, the jews infiltrated doctrine via shape-shifting and supplanted British israelite theory with "Christian" zionism and dispensationalism. This is what we see today especially in america.
But the jews have long since infiltrated the catholic church too, just mote subtly. France, for instance, has been ZOG for hundreds of years. It took a while for them to take the papacy, but they infiltrated secrs of the catholic church before Luther even put a pen to paper. The only church that they have not wormed themselves into is the orthodox church.
>Roughly how long has the Catholic Church been infiltrated significantly enough for it to matter
Depends on the location and the time. In England it was infiltrated, because of the normans, from roughly 1066 (the norman conquest) to 1290 (the expulsion of the jews).
In spain the jews had heavy influence in the catholic church (particularly the jesuits) because of the policy of conversion. Jews will convert, but not in good faith most of the time. The jesuits has a very large number of conversos.
Oh, and England has the converso problem too because Cromwell tried to convert them just like the Spanish.
But really, the *entire* church has been subverted since the 2nd Vatican council. Undoubtedly egged on by converso jews.
>When it comes to France, how far back does it go? French Revolution?
The French revolution onward. With a gap for Vichy France I guess.
Napoleon was a jacobin internationalist kike lover, so were his descendants, so was the French republic, so is the modern French republic.
>And why was the Orthodox Church not infiltrated much?
Because orthodoxy is extremely rigid. It very rarely changes doctrine because it considers the work of the early church fathers to be non contestable dogma. Jews who *do* infiltrate the church, cannot do much to change it, because the viewpoint of the church will very rarely be changed by anyone. Not even patriarchs.
He pushed catholicism in a majority protestant country, he was allied with France in a country where everyone hated France, and there were a lot of disputes about the heir to the throne. Being angry with him was fine, actually, but the replacement was worse for britain and for the anglosphere at large.
>Also, what's the relation between Jews and Protestants?
It's long winded.
Originally, British protestantism and puritanism had a belief in British israelites. Which was a belief that the original israelites from the Bible came to Britain, and that the British are their descendants. Part of this viewpoint was that the false jews must be converted to bring about the second coming of christ.
At some point, because of some jewish trickery, because Cromwell allowed jews into England specifically to convert them to Christianity, the jews infiltrated doctrine via shape-shifting and supplanted British israelite theory with "Christian" zionism and dispensationalism. This is what we see today especially in america.
But the jews have long since infiltrated the catholic church too, just mote subtly. France, for instance, has been ZOG for hundreds of years. It took a while for them to take the papacy, but they infiltrated secrs of the catholic church before Luther even put a pen to paper. The only church that they have not wormed themselves into is the orthodox church.
Depends on the location and the time. In England it was infiltrated, because of the normans, from roughly 1066 (the norman conquest) to 1290 (the expulsion of the jews).
In spain the jews had heavy influence in the catholic church (particularly the jesuits) because of the policy of conversion. Jews will convert, but not in good faith most of the time. The jesuits has a very large number of conversos.
Oh, and England has the converso problem too because Cromwell tried to convert them just like the Spanish.
But really, the *entire* church has been subverted since the 2nd Vatican council. Undoubtedly egged on by converso jews.
>When it comes to France, how far back does it go? French Revolution?
The French revolution onward. With a gap for Vichy France I guess.
Napoleon was a jacobin internationalist kike lover, so were his descendants, so was the French republic, so is the modern French republic.
>And why was the Orthodox Church not infiltrated much?
Because orthodoxy is extremely rigid. It very rarely changes doctrine because it considers the work of the early church fathers to be non contestable dogma. Jews who *do* infiltrate the church, cannot do much to change it, because the viewpoint of the church will very rarely be changed by anyone. Not even patriarchs.