hijacking top comment because it has nothing to do with kike judges here. for people wondering wtf is going on, penny was charged with two charges:
* second degree manslaughter, aka "murder in the heat of the moment". this has ill intent, and is basically alleging penny lost his cool and killed the guy
* criminally negligent homicide, basically causing the death of someone by accident, but unlike a normal no-fault "sometimes shit happens" kind of accident, the allegation is that penny was supposed to be more careful in suppressing this chimp, that he wasn't even exercising basic reasonable care, and his conduct arose to criminal negligence.
this is allowed in american law under what's called "pleading in the alternative". it's fully valid for the prosecutor/plaintiff to say "X happened, and if X didn't happen, then Y happened and either way, you're still guilty/liable".
on the first charge (second degree manslaughter), the jury came back to the judge TWICE and said they failed to come to an agreement. the prosecutors requested the judge to dismiss the charges. it could be for a dozen different reasons... the largest probably that if the jury refused to deliberate it further and entered a hung verdict (which they fully had the power to do), and then there's a good chance the jury would deadlock on negligent homicide too. by withdrawing the manslaughter charges, they at least had a shot at getting negligent homicide. it's all risk calculations.
but then their worst case scenario hit, where the jury said it wasn't negligent homicide either. i don't know under NY state law whether double jeopardy would prevent him from being charged for manslaughter again. in my state, as in many states, anything other than a mistrial triggers double jeopardy. my LLM is suggesting NY is the same law as my state.
I think they tried to throw the book at him, but the jury just didn't go for it. New Yorkers will put up with a lot of libshittery but they know that the subways are a shit show right now and they're fed up with it. The race-baiting isn't strong enough to overcome their frustration at an actual source of inconvenience in their daily lives (I know some New Yorkers and even the ones that don't regularly ride the subway do so specifically because they know what it's like down there these days. They'd love to use it again if it weren't a warzone). I'm not surprised a New York jury would acquit a guy who was just doing something that most of them quietly wish someone would.
1 year ago29 points(+0/-0/+29Score on mirror)3 children
Lord I honestly hope the BLM threat to riot ends up happening. It'll just make people hate niggers that much more. Just about everyone is on Penny's side. Let the niggers hang themselves in the court of public opinion.
Let them chimp out, it only drives Whites out of the cities into areas with lower crime/taxes/regulation, destroying the property values, creating food deserts, and hundreds of other downstream effects that negatively impact niggers and browns
Any White man on Earth old enough to remember the way niggers were celebrating OJ's acquittal should respond to shitskin butt hurt by celebrating in their fucking face. I was just a little kid during the OJ trial/verdict and though it wasn't until I was a grown man that I truly synthesized the lesson there, it's time these fucks got some of the own medicine.
That Wrath Kipling wrote about is coming out of it's long slumber. If the pavement apes try to repeat the 2020 summer of love... they will find that while we are far too patient as a race, once that patience is exhausted, the White hot flame of our righteous rage:
Excellent news. I've been saying this man's life was probably fucked regardless of the outcome, but I honestly didn't think acquittal was even an option. Especially in jew york, and especially in manhattan. Thankfully between that elephant man troon kike ada overreaching so fucking much, the faggot judge colluding with that thing to try to force the jury to convict him with the unprecedented abandonment of the 1st charge to secure the lesser charge... this is a good sign that people have had enough of the fuckery.
Maybe the guy can live a normal life after the almost two years of hell he was put through for doing the right thing and neutralizing a threat. As much as I don't care for lawsuits as a means of accomplishing anything, in this case I hope he sues the ever loving fuck out of every kike rat shit that he can.
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
I've always objected to the "White Boy Summer" bullshit.
White Man Winter is what it should be. We are Aryan men, build to endure & withstand the cold & hardship that comes with our native lands, which are both beautiful beyond belief and incredibly dangerous for any who are not hardy enough to survive.
There is a reason why insects and other shitty creatures (like most kikes and niggers) stay the fuck away from the frigid Northernmost parts of Europe. Yet they flourish in the hot climates, where they usually flock to during summer.
1 year ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)1 child
Perhaps they finally realized what that kike prosecutor was trying to do when they dropped the top charge and moved them to the second charge. Its wishful thinking but maybe that made them realize the whole ordeal was a witch hunt.
either the judges are not corrupt enough, or kikes know the PR disaster of throwing the book at this innocent aryan chad
esp in times when they'll try to recruit young white males into dying for israel/jewkraine
* second degree manslaughter, aka "murder in the heat of the moment". this has ill intent, and is basically alleging penny lost his cool and killed the guy
* criminally negligent homicide, basically causing the death of someone by accident, but unlike a normal no-fault "sometimes shit happens" kind of accident, the allegation is that penny was supposed to be more careful in suppressing this chimp, that he wasn't even exercising basic reasonable care, and his conduct arose to criminal negligence.
this is allowed in american law under what's called "pleading in the alternative". it's fully valid for the prosecutor/plaintiff to say "X happened, and if X didn't happen, then Y happened and either way, you're still guilty/liable".
on the first charge (second degree manslaughter), the jury came back to the judge TWICE and said they failed to come to an agreement. the prosecutors requested the judge to dismiss the charges. it could be for a dozen different reasons... the largest probably that if the jury refused to deliberate it further and entered a hung verdict (which they fully had the power to do), and then there's a good chance the jury would deadlock on negligent homicide too. by withdrawing the manslaughter charges, they at least had a shot at getting negligent homicide. it's all risk calculations.
but then their worst case scenario hit, where the jury said it wasn't negligent homicide either. i don't know under NY state law whether double jeopardy would prevent him from being charged for manslaughter again. in my state, as in many states, anything other than a mistrial triggers double jeopardy. my LLM is suggesting NY is the same law as my state.
Even if found innocent, the process of getting there can be the punishment.