You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 month ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
> was excluded as by a natural consequence.
The issue wasnt necessarily with Luther's initial teachings, which didnt deviate all that much from Catholicism, the issue is how they ended up developing outside of his influence. The main issue with Protestantism is that it mutates and fissions without any Tradition and Dogma to guide its development, even Luther's Sola Scriptura has essentially been abandoned, and without a Tradition to differentiate "real" Protestantism from the heavily judaized form, there is no way of regressing it to a prior state.
30 days ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
Catholicism is arguably just as judaized as protestantism. If not, suffice to say that both are to varying degrees and it's not acceptable.
There are rebellious factions in both Catholicism and protestantism that are opposed to the jew enemy. Minority factions but growing since turn of 21st century.
Zionism and judaism so successfully infiltrated Christendom that it deserves much of the criticism it gets regarding its failure to stand firm in opposition to the synagogue of satan.
Catholicism itself hasnt been Judaized, its been sidelined and replaced by a horrible heresy called Modernism, which is basically the fusion of every prior heresy to ever exist (and thus it is also giga-judaized). Technically, it is the Modernists who are in rebellion, but through the aid of the devil, like the foul Arians, they have created the illusion it is they who are the true church and it is the faithful who are rebels.
30 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
The difference is that Catholicism has a defined dogma and Tradition, so what the Modernists who are occupying the Vatican are doing is blatant heresy and cannot be imputed on the Church because we have already condemned it (the real crime we are guilty of is not launching a Crusade to retake the Vatican). Protestantism doesnt have a holy tradition or a syllabus of errors to condemn deviation, so theres no way to make such a distinction. However, what will really do Protestantism in is their failure to maintain the tradition of Priestly Celibacy, which enables the Church to purge itself of infiltrators naturally. On the other hand, the sects that do not engage in mandatory celibacy create the possibility for infiltrators to essentially nepotize the religion permanently and without any means of removing them outside of schism.
According to Luther's intent, it should again, but a huge issue with Sola Scriptura is that it actually isnt present anywhere within the Canon, and therefore judaized Protestantism has been able to successfully pretend that the Bible can be safely ignored
I think all this is just infighting when basically none of these organizations follow Jesus. Prots and caths are rotted out human organizations, same with Orthodox.
I don't spend my life reading bylaws and doctrinal things, and tbh I don't think Jesus intended that.
The issue wasnt necessarily with Luther's initial teachings, which didnt deviate all that much from Catholicism, the issue is how they ended up developing outside of his influence. The main issue with Protestantism is that it mutates and fissions without any Tradition and Dogma to guide its development, even Luther's Sola Scriptura has essentially been abandoned, and without a Tradition to differentiate "real" Protestantism from the heavily judaized form, there is no way of regressing it to a prior state.
There are rebellious factions in both Catholicism and protestantism that are opposed to the jew enemy. Minority factions but growing since turn of 21st century.
Zionism and judaism so successfully infiltrated Christendom that it deserves much of the criticism it gets regarding its failure to stand firm in opposition to the synagogue of satan.
I don't spend my life reading bylaws and doctrinal things, and tbh I don't think Jesus intended that.