trust the science™️
(media.scored.co)
that's why 13 year old boys beat the best women in the world?
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
12 comments:
8
1 year ago
8 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+8Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
https://archive.md/KL0tA
> Now when you think of "cave people," we hope, you will imagine a mixed-sex group of hunters encircling an errant reindeer or knapping stone tools together rather than a heavy-browed man with a club over one shoulder and a trailing bride. Hunting may have been remade as a masculine activity in recent times, but for most of human history, it belonged to everyone
The authors started with this statement and then worked backwards to fit their derranged narrative
Their infographics are also obese sheeboons
The authors started with this statement and then worked backwards to fit their derranged narrative
Their infographics are also obese sheeboons
it's also comically false.
when the tribe went hunting for a mammoth, it was exclusively males, and multiple men would not survive. males were disposable because a single male could repopulate the entire tribe. but women stayed behind in the cave with the babies.
tribes that didn't do this went extinct. that's just how sexually dimorphic reproductive cycles work on limits to infinity. we know math isn't their strong suit.
anyone who ignores this is an anti-science faggot.
when the tribe went hunting for a mammoth, it was exclusively males, and multiple men would not survive. males were disposable because a single male could repopulate the entire tribe. but women stayed behind in the cave with the babies.
tribes that didn't do this went extinct. that's just how sexually dimorphic reproductive cycles work on limits to infinity. we know math isn't their strong suit.
anyone who ignores this is an anti-science faggot.
I hate Science
This seems like a joke now, and most people reading it will have a laugh, but I predict we are only a few years out before this is actually widely accepted "fact."
They literally did the same thing with race. And people on both sides, despite the evidence against it being right in their face, will still passionately insist it is true; if you even think to deny it, you are evil.
To me, this statement is no more egregious than saying the outcomes of various races are a result of only "socioeconomic factors." Literally the same amount of evidence against that as saying women and men don't have biological differences that make one better at sports
They literally did the same thing with race. And people on both sides, despite the evidence against it being right in their face, will still passionately insist it is true; if you even think to deny it, you are evil.
To me, this statement is no more egregious than saying the outcomes of various races are a result of only "socioeconomic factors." Literally the same amount of evidence against that as saying women and men don't have biological differences that make one better at sports
So, testosterone isn't a performance enhancing drug after all? Does this mean they're going to go back to selling d-bol over the counter?
Toast message