Consoom Feminism
(media.scored.co)
Yep. The mistake was to give in to women... to give in to jewish feminists' demands, and to believe in "equality." There is no equality at any level vertically or horizontally, no matter how you see it. The reason there are groups and patterns is because inequality is so prevalent that large spikes of differences emerge. Not only that, the very concept of individualism is based on the very idea that humans are different (not equal).
What, you want to boil it down to the greatest common denominator, aka "all human life is worth equal"? Wrong. Someone who is age 80 is worth less than someone aged 6. A hobo is worth less than someone who contributes to society through work. A nigger is worthless and not even a "human," scientifically speaking. A woman capable and willing to bear multiple children is worth more than her husband, which is also the reason why it's him who is willing to sacrifice himself to save the lives of his wife and his children. The life of the children is more worth than that of their parents. We value our own lives higher than that of strangers. We value the lives of friends and family higher than that of strangers. To protect others, even if they are objectively and/or subjectively worth less than you, is considered honorable.
Anyway, there is no "equality." We pretend there is, even at that level, because we want to be "nice", but there isn't. There are objective and subjective criteria in play, and we don't talk about it, but we all know it and behave by evaluating it.
And this is the lowest level - any level above like "equality" in competence, interest, behavior, etc is diverging even more. This lowest level is where that triangle reaches its most narrow point, and it's still too broad to consider it "equality."
What, you want to boil it down to the greatest common denominator, aka "all human life is worth equal"? Wrong. Someone who is age 80 is worth less than someone aged 6. A hobo is worth less than someone who contributes to society through work. A nigger is worthless and not even a "human," scientifically speaking. A woman capable and willing to bear multiple children is worth more than her husband, which is also the reason why it's him who is willing to sacrifice himself to save the lives of his wife and his children. The life of the children is more worth than that of their parents. We value our own lives higher than that of strangers. We value the lives of friends and family higher than that of strangers. To protect others, even if they are objectively and/or subjectively worth less than you, is considered honorable.
Anyway, there is no "equality." We pretend there is, even at that level, because we want to be "nice", but there isn't. There are objective and subjective criteria in play, and we don't talk about it, but we all know it and behave by evaluating it.
And this is the lowest level - any level above like "equality" in competence, interest, behavior, etc is diverging even more. This lowest level is where that triangle reaches its most narrow point, and it's still too broad to consider it "equality."
instead of being at home, they get to make powerpoints and excels for mr Shlomobergsteinwitz! how exciting!