Consume Product

They dont just hate *us*, they hate Christ too. We are the camp of the saints, they are Gog and Mat-Gog.

A religion that kept us at the top of the world for 2.000 years? That religion?

It wasnt Christianity that did us in, it was the rejection of it and its replacement with Liberal Humanism (which is also a creation of the jews, as it is an expression of their desire to enslave Humanity under the rule of Antichrist).

Liberal Humanism exploits the defects of the white race (namely being too *nice*) to disarm us spiritually, and provide the false hope of an earthly Utopia (which would be impossible even with the best and morally upright men) as opposed to working toward Eternity.

Classical civilisation and Western civilisation are entirely different entities, we may have some of our knowledge and cultural inspiration from Rome and Greece but we can no more understand them than they could understand us. Our ancestors were the barbarians.

According to Spengler all civilisations have a "culture soul" which is unique to them, one civilisation can never understand the world feeling of another. A civilisation will normally take its character from its primordial environment. Western civilisations primordial environment were the primeval endless forests and swamps of Northern Europe in the dark ages. According to Spengler western man is "faustian" - always willing to go into the unknown whatever it costs him. He characterised classical civilisation as "Apollonian" seeking to imitate the gods.

Classical civilisation never developed industrialisation despite having knowledge of the principles of steam engines and some clues as to steel making. Yet never did. Why would they? They had ample slaves.

In England slavery was never really a thing, labour was not massively abundant as many people were employed in agriculture. As a barbarian people we have an inherent dislike slavery - probably because of some deep racial memory of the Romans doing it to our ancestors. Using machine power to save human power therefore had an incentive.

Christianity was an inevitable to some degree - its a phenomenon I believe Toynbee calls a "universal church" in that it's far more efficient to worship a single god in a single place of worship than the polytheism of classical civilisation. In a high trust homogenous society like the West was within living memory it might have been a beneficial adaption that your church encouraged you to forgive those who slighted you and to be magnanimous in victory.

Christianity to some degree is suffering from rot just like any institution does. Just as the "universal church" is an inevitable cultural innovation, so too is a "universal state". Eventually institutions always rot and endure some kind of crisis - either finding some way to reform and save themselves or disappearing. The universal state - i.e "The Global American Empire" that we all live under in the west has done much work to actively corrupt the church as in terms De Jouvenal would use it is a "rival castle" to their power and church leadership has been more than happy to go along with the "current thing" narratives in many cases as the current leadership want to protect their own power and positions rather than risk being supplanted by a counter elite probably who would take a more masculine coded and less forgiving attitude. As someone might say - "We have been shown no quarter so we will give none".

Chinese civilisation has had a universal state since before the birth of Christ and it has gone through endless iterations of rise and fall within that time.

Western civilisation is a far newer civilisation and is going through an existential crisis - either we will save ourselves or we won't. Many of our weaknesses have functioned as strengths in the past yet have been coopted or taken advantage of by hostile out groups or hostile corrupt elites. We had a good run, history is littered with the graves of other civilisations who were masters of the world when they existed and now are just ruins in the ground and a few stories passed down through the oral tradition or writings no one can translate.