>Was the Katyn Massacre of Poles ever brought up in the Nuremberg tribunals?
Actually yes, when the soviets tried to blame it on the Germans. Which failed, so they just dropped it. Of course they wouldn't charge the Soviets with anything at Nuremberg, because a war crime trial isn't a real trial; it's a false mask of modern civilization placed over the ancient principle of vae victus. Which is why the winners were allowed to torture any POWs they wanted to put on trial.
> A good amount of folks convicted at Nuremberg were let out by Americans and Germans later
What? Are you fucking kidding?
Give me only 1 example.
The even kept a whole fucking prison up and running only for one man alone, they had to wait until he died of old age because he was given life in prison.
The article is so painful to read for how dumb it is. It claims that the Third Reich diverged from "Western civilization" and this is batshit insane. It's democracy that diverged from Western civilization in historical terms; Germany had been a democracy for only 12 years and against its will.
Anyway, the confusion here is that when someone says "at Nuremberg" what is generally understood is the International Military Tribunal (IMT) which had [24 defendants](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_defendants_at_the_International_Military_Tribunal). None of them had their sentence reduced.
What the article talks about is a bunch of other trials that involved nobody important and that nobody cared about.
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)2 children
The most sinister thing about it is how it has impacted religion. Before the Holocaust Narrative, the Roman Catholic Church was naming them regularly and the Jesuits were trying to warn everyone about Judeo-Communism (yes, they were actually counter-semitic back then, the protocols kvetch about them being the greatest threat to jewish dominion). The ideas of religious indifferentism regarding the jews and the whole concept of judeo-christianity would be rightly laughed out of the room. You had Priests like Father Coughlin on live radio jewpilling everyone about the true origins of communism. Of course, that all changed with the second world war, where the best and brightest fighting Christian men were killed off in the battles, and the Church was left vulnerable due to the fog of war. Of course, the jews showed their hand at Vatican II, and have basically tarred any cleric who dares teach the actual Catholic Faith, especially regarding the jews, as an anti-semite, which is of course what boomers and the goyest gen fear being called more than than anything, thanks to decades of TV psyopping. The Church served as the world's immune system against the jew, but due to the stupidly and cowardly so-called "Greatest" Generation they have effectively circumvented it. Of course, the Church can never be truly destroyed, it survived one set of Jews, and it wont be taken out by a bunch of Satanic posers either, but it will take some time to fix it.
Nice try, but the Pope of the 1930s supported the Jews and not the Third Reich.
> You had Priests like Father Coughlin
Oh wow, ONE priest? ONE? Out of thousands and thousands of clerics, you take ONE priest which is the lowest position in the Church, as your argument? Not even a bishop?
Christianity needs to die before we can deal with the Jewish problem. You are part of the problem.
The Pope of the 1930s was trying to remain neutral, he got the jews out Germany under the Reich and then helped the Nazis escape after it.
>Christianity needs to die before we can deal with the Jewish problem
The fact that the jews are problem to begin with is evidence enough that Christianity is already for the most part dead. A parasite cannot invade if the immune system of the host recognizes it as such. The Reformation (especially the judaized parts of it) and Enlightenment was the equivalent of AIDS for western civilization, it destroyed and confused the Christian immune system to the point that all we have left is foreign cells claiming they are white blood cells, all while they attack anything that tries to fight back against parasitization.
> without [Christianity] there would be no collective white identity to defend
I will concede that this point is very true when us White people were fighting against the Mudslimes. We cannot forget the battle of Vienna. Christianity certainly gave us unity against Islam.
However, the world is very different now.
On one hand Christianity has been completely subverted, with the Pope that openly calls for non-Christian immigration. And on the other, the invaders are niggers or shitskins that may be Christians.
Therefore us White people need something else to differentiate ourselves from the masses of non-white Christians.
The majority of Christians in the world are not White, have you ever thought of that?
Actually yes, when the soviets tried to blame it on the Germans. Which failed, so they just dropped it. Of course they wouldn't charge the Soviets with anything at Nuremberg, because a war crime trial isn't a real trial; it's a false mask of modern civilization placed over the ancient principle of vae victus. Which is why the winners were allowed to torture any POWs they wanted to put on trial.
What? Are you fucking kidding?
Give me only 1 example.
The even kept a whole fucking prison up and running only for one man alone, they had to wait until he died of old age because he was given life in prison.
Anyway, the confusion here is that when someone says "at Nuremberg" what is generally understood is the International Military Tribunal (IMT) which had [24 defendants](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_defendants_at_the_International_Military_Tribunal). None of them had their sentence reduced.
What the article talks about is a bunch of other trials that involved nobody important and that nobody cared about.