You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
JesusSupporter33 on scored.co
3 months ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
> indo Europeans
I keep seeing this term pop up recently. Stop using it. It means "indian European" which I'm sure is going to be used as a stepping stone to absolute nonsense in the very near future.
"Indo-Europeans" are the Aryans who went to India and interbred with them. That is it. The Aryans who stayed in Turkic lands, migrated to Persia, the ME, Europe, Greece, Europe, ect, ARE NOT RELATED TO "INDO" WHATSOEVER.
It's just a macro group. Europeans and the (formerly) aryan Indians are the most numerous descendants of the yamnaya and the most directly descended from them in culture. Saying indo-central asian-western chinese-european-Iranian would not roll off the tongue too well.
It's like taking 2 squirts of blue paint, mixing one with black and claiming the other that's still blue came from the blackened one. Indo-Aryans and Euro-Aryans are two totally distinct and separate groups that merely share a prehistoric common ancestor. Indo-Aryans are still in India. We did not come from India.
Mark my words, in 20 years this new "Indo-European" garbage is going to turn into "white people came from India."
I keep seeing this term pop up recently. Stop using it. It means "indian European" which I'm sure is going to be used as a stepping stone to absolute nonsense in the very near future.
"Indo-Europeans" are the Aryans who went to India and interbred with them. That is it. The Aryans who stayed in Turkic lands, migrated to Persia, the ME, Europe, Greece, Europe, ect, ARE NOT RELATED TO "INDO" WHATSOEVER.
Mark my words, in 20 years this new "Indo-European" garbage is going to turn into "white people came from India."