Consume Product

As is the lie (developed by (((Jared Diamond))), by the way) that "we redskins wuz advanced civilizations with a population of +100 million before le heckin' ebil **w**hite man came along n shiiiiieeeeeeeeeetttttt"

True, but it is important to know that arrowhead/stone tool styles are VERY consistent in regards to their culture. It's why we even know they could've been European in the first place.

"History keeps getting older."

Are you suggesting that Europeans came from NA?

its like mesopotamia, the asiatics and brownies far outnumbered the White folks living in Sumer

lol

Where would they even go back to?

My economics teacher from way back when told me that all humans are halfbreeds.

Technically speaking, he was right.

I still hate amerimutts and bean goblins, though.

> average white person has less than 1/3 of the genetics that the solutreans would have had

Incorrect. While there certainly are and were a whole host of genetic disparities between us and them, the Solutreans were Y-dna Haplogroup R1b- precisely the same as (most) Western Europeans today. While certainly it's true that the Solutreans were more closely related to the Western Hunter-Gatherers than most of us living today are, they still had enough EEF blood in them to be fairly considered European despite the notable absence of a lot of Western Steppe Herder alleles that later Europeans all have.

> If they were isolated in america for thousands of years, the asiatic natives never came, thus they continued populating it, and european history continued as normal, we would likely end up there and view them as an entirely different race anyways

Actually, the first Asiatic migrants (e.g. the Bering Strait crossers) made their way over to the American supercontinent not long after the Solutreans, maybe four or five generations later, before the Clovis extinction during the Younger Dryas Impact that all but wiped out Beringers and Solutreans alike. While what we recognize as Native American "culture" (i.e. cannibalism, constant skullduggery, and savagery) is the degenerate behavior that treeniggers descended into when the Mound-Builders were wiped out.

> If Europe continued without the farmers and steppe invaders dominating it, it's likely that Europeans today would be absolutely nothing like they are currently (ergo they would not be able to be considered "white"). Aryan-ness itself as a concept comes from the steppe invaders. As do pale skin and blonde hair.

No. Just.... no. The Western Steppe Herders' most important contribution to European history (besides some not-insignificant quantities of genetic material, granted) was domesticating the horse. That innovation spread laterally to just about every other Old World civilization within a few centuries (faster by far for those who lived closer to the Steppe). While WSH got pretty damn far on the backs of their technological advantage, most places either assimilated them or turned them out after a few generations. The Aryans who invaded the Indus River Valley were successful beyond their wildest imagination largely thanks to the foundational work already done by the Indus River Valley Civilization on the Dravidians. But that's another story for another time.

> indo Europeans

I keep seeing this term pop up recently. Stop using it. It means "indian European" which I'm sure is going to be used as a stepping stone to absolute nonsense in the very near future.

"Indo-Europeans" are the Aryans who went to India and interbred with them. That is it. The Aryans who stayed in Turkic lands, migrated to Persia, the ME, Europe, Greece, Europe, ect, ARE NOT RELATED TO "INDO" WHATSOEVER.