Is it because it's being DDOS attacked often, or just because it's hosted on shitty servers?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
Brannvesen on scored.co
3 months ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)
It's a unintended drawback, because you don't want people behind the platform who (((they))) can buy, kill or corrupt. Hybrid solutions may be the answer, the network itself should only generate long hashes and provide no built in search functionality. Keep all of that on a layer above.
That way, we can have thousands of file hosting sites, all with their own rules, but they all use the same back-end for file storage which is distributed and un-censorable. And the cost would go down by a lot too as it's a lot easier for a web server to serve a static file vs a dynamic file.
It'll be like the internet itself, which is also uncensored and anyone can start their own website were they host whatever they want.
That way, we can have thousands of file hosting sites, all with their own rules, but they all use the same back-end for file storage which is distributed and un-censorable. And the cost would go down by a lot too as it's a lot easier for a web server to serve a static file vs a dynamic file.
It'll be like the internet itself, which is also uncensored and anyone can start their own website were they host whatever they want.